文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

比较仅使用电子烟者与传统吸烟者的自评健康状况:对2019年英格兰健康调查的分析。

Comparing self-rated health among exclusive e-cigarette users and traditional cigarette smokers: an analysis of the Health Survey for England 2019.

作者信息

Adebisi Yusuff Adebayo, Bafail Duaa Abdullah

机构信息

College of Social Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Intern Emerg Med. 2025 Mar;20(2):441-452. doi: 10.1007/s11739-024-03817-y. Epub 2024 Nov 15.


DOI:10.1007/s11739-024-03817-y
PMID:39546077
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11950125/
Abstract

The health implications of e-cigarette use compared to traditional cigarette smoking continue to attract significant public health interest. This study examines self-rated health (SRH) outcomes among exclusive e-cigarette users versus exclusive traditional cigarette smokers, using data from the Health Survey for England 2019. From an initial sample of 10,299 participants, the study focused on 8204 adults, excluding those aged 0-15. Further refinement to exclusive nicotine product users led to 274 e-cigarette users and 1017 cigarette smokers, after excluding dual users, never users, ex-users, non-responders, and users of other tobacco products such as pipes and cigars. SRH was derived from participants' responses to a question asking how they rated their general health, with five possible options: "very good", "good", "fair", "bad", and "very bad". For the purposes of this study, these responses were collapsed into two categories: "Good Health" (combining "very good" and "good") and "Poor Health" (combining "fair", "bad", and "very bad"). Consequently, 834 participants were classified as reporting good health, while 457 reported poor health. Binary logistic regression, adjusted for factors such as age, sex, ethnicity, residence, education, body mass index, alcohol use, age started smoking, physical or mental health conditions, and frequency of GP visits, revealed that exclusive e-cigarette users were significantly more likely to report good health compared to exclusive cigarette smokers, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.59 (95% CI: 1.10 - 2.32, p = 0.014). As a sensitivity analysis, a generalized ordered logistic regression model was performed using the original five SRH categories. The adjusted model confirmed consistent results, with exclusive e-cigarette users showing higher odds of reporting better health across the full range of SRH outcomes (OR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.08-1.82, p = 0.011). These findings suggest that exclusive e-cigarette users perceive their health more positively than traditional cigarette smokers, contributing useful insights to the discussions around harm reduction strategies.

摘要

与传统吸烟相比,使用电子烟对健康的影响一直备受公众健康关注。本研究利用2019年英格兰健康调查的数据,调查了仅使用电子烟者与仅使用传统香烟者的自评健康(SRH)结果。在最初的10299名参与者样本中,该研究聚焦于8204名成年人,不包括0至15岁的人群。进一步筛选出仅使用尼古丁产品的用户,在排除同时使用两种产品者、从不使用者、曾经使用者、未回应者以及使用烟斗和雪茄等其他烟草产品的用户后,得到274名电子烟使用者和1017名吸烟者。SRH来自参与者对一个询问他们如何评价自己总体健康状况的问题的回答,有五个可能的选项:“非常好”、“好”、“一般”、“差”和“非常差”。在本研究中,这些回答被归纳为两类:“健康良好”(合并“非常好”和“好”)和“健康不佳”(合并“一般”、“差”和“非常差”)。因此,834名参与者被归类为报告健康良好,而457名报告健康不佳。在对年龄、性别、种族、居住地区、教育程度、体重指数、饮酒情况、开始吸烟年龄、身体或心理健康状况以及看全科医生的频率等因素进行调整后,二元逻辑回归显示,与仅吸烟者相比,仅使用电子烟者报告健康良好的可能性显著更高,优势比(OR)为1.59(95%置信区间:1.10 - 2.32,p = 0.014)。作为敏感性分析,使用原始的五个SRH类别进行了广义有序逻辑回归模型分析。调整后的模型证实了一致的结果,在整个SRH结果范围内,仅使用电子烟者报告健康状况更好的几率更高(OR = 1.40,95%置信区间:1.08 - 1.82,p = 0.011)。这些发现表明,仅使用电子烟者对自己健康的看法比传统吸烟者更积极,为围绕减少危害策略的讨论提供了有用的见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bd2/11950125/7c077733222e/11739_2024_3817_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bd2/11950125/7c077733222e/11739_2024_3817_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bd2/11950125/7c077733222e/11739_2024_3817_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Comparing self-rated health among exclusive e-cigarette users and traditional cigarette smokers: an analysis of the Health Survey for England 2019.

Intern Emerg Med. 2025-3

[2]
Self-rated health differences between exclusive e-cigarette users and exclusive cigarette smokers: evidence from the 2017-2019 Scottish Health Survey.

Intern Emerg Med. 2025-4

[3]
Exclusive E-Cigarette Users Report Lower Levels of Respiratory Symptoms Relative to Dual E-Cigarette and Cigarette Users.

Nicotine Tob Res. 2020-12-15

[4]
Perceived relative harm of using e-cigarettes predicts future product switching among US adult cigarette and e-cigarette dual users.

Addiction. 2019-7-25

[5]
Quitting Behaviors Among Dual Cigarette and E-Cigarette Users and Cigarette Smokers Enrolled in the Tobacco User Adult Cohort.

Nicotine Tob Res. 2019-2-18

[6]
Electronic cigarette use and cigarette smoking associated with inadequate sleep duration among U.S. young adults.

Prev Med. 2023-10

[7]
Exposure to Toxicants Associated With Use and Transitions Between Cigarettes, e-Cigarettes, and No Tobacco.

JAMA Netw Open. 2022-2-1

[8]
A Longitudinal Study of Exposure to Tobacco-Related Toxicants and Subsequent Respiratory Symptoms Among U.S. Adults with Varying E-cigarette Use Status.

Nicotine Tob Res. 2020-12-15

[9]
Psychosocial and Behavioral Risk Profiles of Cigarette Smokers and E-Cigarette Users Among Adolescents in Minnesota: The 2016 Minnesota Student Survey.

Prev Chronic Dis. 2018-9-27

[10]
Sleep disturbances among young adult dual users of cigarettes and e-cigarettes: Analysis of the 2020 National Health Interview Survey.

PLoS One. 2025-3-25

引用本文的文献

[1]
Predictors of e-cigarette use among individuals with asthma: findings from a cross-sectional population-based study.

Intern Emerg Med. 2025-7-12

[2]
'E-cigarette smoking' is a misleading term: a critical review of its use in academic literature.

Intern Emerg Med. 2025-6-18

[3]
When meta-analysis misleads: the need for methodological integrity in e-cigarette research.

Intern Emerg Med. 2025-6-17

[4]
Self-rated health differences between exclusive e-cigarette users and exclusive cigarette smokers: evidence from the 2017-2019 Scottish Health Survey.

Intern Emerg Med. 2025-4

本文引用的文献

[1]
Trends in vaping and smoking following the rise of disposable e-cigarettes: a repeat cross-sectional study in England between 2016 and 2023.

Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024-5-23

[2]
Increased e-cigarette use prevalence is associated with decreased smoking prevalence among US adults.

Harm Reduct J. 2024-7-18

[3]
Prevalence, demographic, socio-economic, and lifestyle factors associated with cigarette, e-cigarette, and dual use: evidence from the 2017-2021 Scottish Health Survey.

Intern Emerg Med. 2024-11

[4]
Predictors and Prevalence of Alcohol and Cannabis Co-use Among Filipino Adolescents: Evidence From a School-based Student Health Survey.

J Prev Med Public Health. 2024-5

[5]
Correction to: Respiratory health efects of e-cigarette substitution for tobacco cigarettes: a systematic review.

Harm Reduct J. 2024-3-13

[6]
Exploring electronic cigarette portrayals: a content and thematic analysis of African online news coverage.

Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2023-8-29

[7]
Exposure to Tobacco-Specific Nitrosamines Among People Who Vape, Smoke, or do Neither: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Nicotine Tob Res. 2024-2-22

[8]
Medicalisation of vaping in the UK? E-cigarette users' perspectives on the merging of commercial and medical routes to vaping.

Perspect Public Health. 2023-8-6

[9]
Characterization and Summarization of the Impact of Electronic Cigarettes on the Cardiovascular System: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Cureus. 2023-5-26

[10]
The risk profile of electronic nicotine delivery systems, compared to traditional cigarettes, on oral disease: a review.

Front Public Health. 2023

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索