College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Dec 15;22(Suppl 1):S61-S69. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa180.
The link between e-cigarette use and subsequent development of respiratory diseases remains an open question.
A subset of a probability sample of U.S. adults from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study Waves 1 and 2 were selected for biospecimen analysis (n = 4614). Subjects were divided into three mutually exclusive groups at baseline: nonusers (n = 2849), exclusive e-cigarette users (n = 222), and poly e-cigarette/tobacco users (n = 1,543). Geometric mean concentrations of baseline biomarkers from five classes of harmful and potentially harmful constituents were reported. Multivariable linear regressions were conducted to examine the relationship between baseline biomarkers and subsequent respiratory symptoms among user groups.
Baseline exclusive e-cigarette users (33.6%[confidence interval, CI: 26.7% to 41.4%]) and poly e-cigarette/tobacco users (50.8%[CI: 47.4% to 54.2%]) had higher prevalence of subsequent respiratory symptoms than nonusers (21.7%[19.2% to 24.4%]). As compared with nonusers, poly e-cigarette/tobacco users had higher concentrations in clinically relevant biomarkers at baseline than exclusive e-cigarette users. Among poly e-cigarette/tobacco users, baseline nicotine metabolites (TNE2, cotinine), tobacco-specific nitrosamine (NNAL), PAH (1-NAP, 3-FLU), and volatile organic compound (N-Acetyl-S-(2-carboxyethyl)-l-cysteine, N-acetyl-S-(2-cyanoethyl)-l-cysteine) were significantly higher among those reporting subsequent respiratory symptoms than those who did not. Among exclusive e-cigarette users, baseline NNAL was significantly higher among those reporting subsequent respiratory symptoms than those who did not. Within subjects with subsequent respiratory symptoms, NNAL was 2.5 times higher in exclusive e-cigarette users (10.7[6.5 to 17.5]) and 63.4 times higher in poly e-cigarette/tobacco users (199.6[176.7 to 225.4]) than nonusers (3.1[2.4 to 3.9]).
E-cigarette use is associated with higher concentrations of known tobacco-related toxicants and risks of subsequent respiratory symptoms than nonusers. Poly e-cigarette/tobacco users exhibit higher risk than exclusive e-cigarette users.
This longitudinal study identified positive associations between baseline urinary biomarkers of exposure to tobacco-related toxicants and increased risks of subsequent respiratory symptoms across varying e-cigarette use groups. E-cigarette use is associated with increased exposure to known tobacco-related toxicants, and certain toxicant exposure increases the risk of respiratory symptoms.
电子烟使用与随后呼吸道疾病发展之间的联系仍然是一个悬而未决的问题。
从美国成年人的人口评估烟草和健康研究波 1 和 2 的概率样本中选择生物标本分析的亚组(n = 4614)。在基线时,受试者被分为三个互斥的组:非使用者(n = 2849)、纯电子烟使用者(n = 222)和多电子烟/烟草使用者(n = 1543)。报告了五类有害和潜在有害成分的基线生物标志物的几何平均浓度。进行多变量线性回归以检查用户组中基线生物标志物与随后呼吸道症状之间的关系。
基线纯电子烟使用者(33.6%[置信区间,CI:26.7%至 41.4%])和多电子烟/烟草使用者(50.8%[CI:47.4%至 54.2%])的后续呼吸道症状的发生率高于非使用者(21.7%[19.2%至 24.4%])。与非使用者相比,多电子烟/烟草使用者的基线临床相关生物标志物浓度高于纯电子烟使用者。在多电子烟/烟草使用者中,报告随后呼吸道症状的患者的基线尼古丁代谢物(TNE2、可替宁)、烟草特异性亚硝胺(NNAL)、多环芳烃(1-NAP、3-FLU)和挥发性有机化合物(N-乙酰-S-(2-羧乙基)-l-半胱氨酸,N-乙酰-S-(2-氰乙基)-l-半胱氨酸)均高于无呼吸道症状的患者。在纯电子烟使用者中,报告随后呼吸道症状的患者的基线 NNAL 高于无症状患者。在有后续呼吸道症状的受试者中,纯电子烟使用者的 NNAL 是无呼吸道症状患者的 2.5 倍(10.7[6.5 至 17.5]),多电子烟/烟草使用者是无呼吸道症状患者的 63.4 倍(199.6[176.7 至 225.4])。
电子烟的使用与非使用者相比,与更高浓度的已知与烟草相关的有毒物质和随后呼吸道症状的风险相关。多电子烟/烟草使用者的风险高于纯电子烟使用者。
这项纵向研究确定了基线尿液中暴露于与烟草相关的有毒物质的生物标志物与不同电子烟使用组中随后呼吸道症状风险增加之间的正相关关系。电子烟的使用与已知与烟草相关的有毒物质的暴露增加有关,并且某些有毒物质的暴露会增加呼吸道症状的风险。