Suppr超能文献

自动超阈值与定量阈值视野检查的持续时间。年龄和眼部状况的影响。

Duration of automated suprathreshold vs quantitative threshold field examination. Impact of age and ocular status.

作者信息

Kosoko O, Sommer A, Auer C

出版信息

Arch Ophthalmol. 1986 Mar;104(3):398-401. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1986.01050150098036.

Abstract

We investigated the impact of age and ocular status on the duration of automated threshold and suprathreshold testing of the visual field in a study of 57 eyes with glaucomatous field loss, 58 eyes with ocular hypertension, and 190 eyes of normal controls. It was faster to run a three-zone threshold-related suprathreshold 120-point full-field screening test on younger subjects and normal controls than on older subjects or subjects with early glaucomatous field loss. In contrast, the time required for full quantitative thresholding of 76 points within the central 30 degrees was unaffected by either age or ocular status. Normal individuals required 40% more time to complete the quantitative threshold test than the "full-field" screening test.

摘要

在一项针对57只患有青光眼性视野缺损的眼睛、58只患有高眼压症的眼睛以及190只正常对照眼睛的研究中,我们调查了年龄和眼部状况对自动阈值和超阈值视野测试时长的影响。对年轻受试者和正常对照进行三区阈值相关的超阈值120点全视野筛查测试,比对老年受试者或早期青光眼性视野缺损受试者进行该测试要快。相比之下,中央30度范围内76点的全定量阈值测定所需时间不受年龄或眼部状况的影响。正常个体完成定量阈值测试所需的时间比“全视野”筛查测试多40%。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验