• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自动超阈值与定量阈值视野检查的持续时间。年龄和眼部状况的影响。

Duration of automated suprathreshold vs quantitative threshold field examination. Impact of age and ocular status.

作者信息

Kosoko O, Sommer A, Auer C

出版信息

Arch Ophthalmol. 1986 Mar;104(3):398-401. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1986.01050150098036.

DOI:10.1001/archopht.1986.01050150098036
PMID:3954641
Abstract

We investigated the impact of age and ocular status on the duration of automated threshold and suprathreshold testing of the visual field in a study of 57 eyes with glaucomatous field loss, 58 eyes with ocular hypertension, and 190 eyes of normal controls. It was faster to run a three-zone threshold-related suprathreshold 120-point full-field screening test on younger subjects and normal controls than on older subjects or subjects with early glaucomatous field loss. In contrast, the time required for full quantitative thresholding of 76 points within the central 30 degrees was unaffected by either age or ocular status. Normal individuals required 40% more time to complete the quantitative threshold test than the "full-field" screening test.

摘要

在一项针对57只患有青光眼性视野缺损的眼睛、58只患有高眼压症的眼睛以及190只正常对照眼睛的研究中,我们调查了年龄和眼部状况对自动阈值和超阈值视野测试时长的影响。对年轻受试者和正常对照进行三区阈值相关的超阈值120点全视野筛查测试,比对老年受试者或早期青光眼性视野缺损受试者进行该测试要快。相比之下,中央30度范围内76点的全定量阈值测定所需时间不受年龄或眼部状况的影响。正常个体完成定量阈值测试所需的时间比“全视野”筛查测试多40%。

相似文献

1
Duration of automated suprathreshold vs quantitative threshold field examination. Impact of age and ocular status.自动超阈值与定量阈值视野检查的持续时间。年龄和眼部状况的影响。
Arch Ophthalmol. 1986 Mar;104(3):398-401. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1986.01050150098036.
2
Short-wavelength automated perimetry in low-, medium-, and high-risk ocular hypertensive eyes. Initial baseline results.低、中、高风险眼压升高眼的短波自动视野检查。初始基线结果。
Arch Ophthalmol. 1995 Jan;113(1):70-6. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1995.01100010072023.
3
Static flicker perimetry in glaucoma and ocular hypertension.青光眼和高眼压症的静态闪烁视野检查法
Curr Eye Res. 1991 Mar;10(3):205-12. doi: 10.3109/02713689109003442.
4
Quantitative comparison of static perimetric strategies in early glaucoma: test-retest variability.早期青光眼静态视野检查策略的定量比较:重测变异性
J Glaucoma. 2000 Jun;9(3):247-53. doi: 10.1097/00061198-200006000-00008.
5
Improving the sensitivity of the OKP visual field screening test with the use of neutral density filters.使用中性密度滤光片提高OKP视野筛查试验的敏感性。
Eye (Lond). 1994;8 ( Pt 4):406-9. doi: 10.1038/eye.1994.96.
6
Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma.用于青光眼不同神经节细胞群间接比较的视觉功能特异性视野检查法。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000 Jun;41(7):1783-90.
7
Association of reliability with reproducibility of the glaucomatous visual field.青光眼视野的可靠性与可重复性的关联
Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1992 Oct;70(5):665-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1992.tb02150.x.
8
Blue-on-yellow perimetry can predict the development of glaucomatous visual field loss.蓝黄视野检查可预测青光眼性视野缺损的发展。
Arch Ophthalmol. 1993 May;111(5):645-50. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1993.01090050079034.
9
A comparison of the OKP visual field screening test with the Humphrey field analyser.OKP视野筛查试验与 Humphrey 视野分析仪的比较。
Eye (Lond). 1992;6 ( Pt 5):521-4. doi: 10.1038/eye.1992.110.
10
Static versus kinetic testing in the nasal peripheral field in patients with glaucoma.
Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1992 Feb;70(1):79-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1992.tb02095.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Visual field in hysteria-reliability of visual field by Goldmann perimetry.癔症中的视野——戈德曼视野计视野检查的可靠性
Doc Ophthalmol. 1989 Jan;71(1):61-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00155133.
2
Calculating the predictive power of the Henson field screener in a population at risk of glaucomatous field loss.计算亨森视野筛查仪在有青光眼性视野缺损风险人群中的预测能力。
Br J Ophthalmol. 1990 Apr;74(4):220-2. doi: 10.1136/bjo.74.4.220.