• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

制定实施干预措施,并确定将健康创新融入常规实践的策略:以实施胰岛素患者决策辅助工具为例。

Developing an implementation intervention, and identifying strategies for integrating health innovations in routine practice: A case study of the implementation of an insulin patient decision aid.

机构信息

Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Department of Research, SingHealth Polyclinics, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Nov 15;19(11):e0310654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310654. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0310654
PMID:39546450
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11567623/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Implementation, which is defined as the process of getting evidence-based innovation to be utilised is critical in ensuring innovation is being integrated into real-world practice. The way an implementation intervention (i.e., a bundle of strategies to facilitate implementation) is developed has an impact on the types of strategies chosen, and whether they are relevant to the implementation setting to exert their effects. However, literature pertaining to development of intervention or detailed descriptions of implementation processes are scarce. This study aims to report the development of an implementation intervention to integrate the use of an evidence-based innovation in routine practice, using a Malaysian insulin patient decision aid (PDA) as an exemplar.

METHODS

The development of the insulin PDA implementation intervention was divided into two phases, incorporating step 3 and 4 of the Action Cycle in the Knowledge to Action framework. In Phase 1, barriers to the insulin PDA implementation was explored through qualitative interviews using an interview guide developed based on the Theoretical Domains Framework. In Phase 2, prioritisation of the barriers was conducted using the multivoting technique. Next, potential strategies that can address the barriers were identified based on understanding the clinic context, and evidence from literature. Then, the selected strategies were operationalised by providing full descriptions in terms of its actor, action, action target, temporality, dose, implementation outcome affected, before they were embedded into the patient care pathway in the clinic. The implementation intervention was finalised through a clinic stakeholders meeting.

RESULTS

In Phase 1, a total of 15 focus group discussions and 37 in-depth individual interviews were conducted with: healthcare policymakers (n = 11), doctors (n = 22), diabetes educators (n = 8), staff nurses (n = 6), pharmacists (n = 6), and patients (n = 31). A total of 26 barriers and 11 facilitators emerged and they were categorised into HCP, patient, organisational, and innovation factors. The multivoting exercise resulted in the prioritisation of 13 barriers, and subsequently, a total of 11 strategies were identified to address those barriers. The strategies were mandate change, training workshop, involve patients' family members or caretakers, framing/reframing, inform healthcare providers on the advantages of the insulin PDA use, define roles and responsibilities, place the insulin PDA in the consultation room, provide feedback, systematic documentation, to engage patients in treatment discussions, and juxtapose PDA in preferred language with patient's PDA in their preferred language to help with translation.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights main barriers to PDA implementation, and strategies that can be adopted for implementation. The steps for intervention development in this study can be compared with other intervention development methods to advance the field of implementation of evidence-based innovations.

摘要

背景

实施是将基于证据的创新应用于实践的过程,对于确保创新融入现实实践至关重要。实施干预措施(即促进实施的一系列策略)的开发方式会影响所选择策略的类型,以及这些策略是否与实施环境相关以发挥作用。然而,关于干预措施的开发或实施过程的详细描述的文献却很少。本研究旨在报告一种实施干预措施的开发,以将循证创新融入常规实践中,以马来西亚胰岛素患者决策辅助工具(PDA)为例。

方法

胰岛素 PDA 实施干预措施的开发分为两个阶段,将知识转化行动框架中的第 3 步和第 4 步纳入其中。在第 1 阶段,通过使用基于理论领域框架制定的访谈指南,通过定性访谈探索胰岛素 PDA 实施的障碍。在第 2 阶段,使用多投票技术对障碍进行优先级排序。接下来,根据对临床环境的了解和文献中的证据,确定可以解决障碍的潜在策略。然后,通过提供有关其参与者、行动、行动目标、时间性、剂量、受影响的实施结果的完整描述,将选定的策略纳入诊所的患者护理路径中。通过诊所利益相关者会议完成实施干预措施。

结果

在第 1 阶段,总共进行了 15 次焦点小组讨论和 37 次深入的个人访谈,参与者包括:医疗政策制定者(n=11)、医生(n=22)、糖尿病教育者(n=8)、护士(n=6)、药剂师(n=6)和患者(n=31)。共出现 26 个障碍和 11 个促进因素,并将其分为卫生保健提供者、患者、组织和创新因素。多投票练习导致 13 个障碍得到优先排序,随后确定了 11 项策略来解决这些障碍。这些策略包括:改变命令、培训研讨会、让患者的家属或照顾者参与进来、调整框架/重新调整框架、向医疗保健提供者介绍使用胰岛素 PDA 的优势、明确角色和责任、将胰岛素 PDA 放在咨询室、提供反馈、系统文档、让患者参与治疗讨论、将 PDA 翻译成首选语言并与患者的 PDA 翻译成他们的首选语言以帮助翻译。

结论

本研究强调了 PDA 实施的主要障碍和可以采用的实施策略。本研究中干预措施开发的步骤可以与其他干预措施开发方法进行比较,以推进循证创新的实施领域。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46a1/11567623/39f1a0b249db/pone.0310654.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46a1/11567623/a847c3b9f1bb/pone.0310654.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46a1/11567623/4ba5d759158b/pone.0310654.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46a1/11567623/39f1a0b249db/pone.0310654.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46a1/11567623/a847c3b9f1bb/pone.0310654.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46a1/11567623/4ba5d759158b/pone.0310654.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46a1/11567623/39f1a0b249db/pone.0310654.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Developing an implementation intervention, and identifying strategies for integrating health innovations in routine practice: A case study of the implementation of an insulin patient decision aid.制定实施干预措施,并确定将健康创新融入常规实践的策略:以实施胰岛素患者决策辅助工具为例。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 15;19(11):e0310654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310654. eCollection 2024.
2
Factors influencing implementation of a patient decision aid in a developing country: an exploratory study.影响发展中国家患者决策辅助工具实施的因素:一项探索性研究。
Implement Sci. 2017 Mar 21;12(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0569-9.
3
Factors influencing implementation of an insulin patient decision aid at public health clinics in Malaysia: A qualitative study.影响马来西亚公共卫生诊所胰岛素患者决策辅助工具实施的因素:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 30;15(12):e0244645. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244645. eCollection 2020.
4
What will make patients use a patient decision aid? A qualitative study on patients' perspectives on implementation barriers and facilitators.什么会促使患者使用患者决策辅助工具?一项关于患者对实施障碍和促进因素看法的定性研究。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2020 Jun;26(3):755-764. doi: 10.1111/jep.13161. Epub 2019 May 21.
5
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
6
Cultural adaptation of a patient decision-aid for insulin therapy.胰岛素治疗患者决策辅助工具的文化调适。
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 8;10(3):e033791. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033791.
7
Using a patient decision aid for insulin initiation in patients with type 2 diabetes: a qualitative analysis of doctor-patient conversations in primary care consultations in Malaysia.在2型糖尿病患者中使用胰岛素起始治疗患者决策辅助工具:马来西亚基层医疗会诊中医患对话的定性分析
BMJ Open. 2017 May 9;7(5):e014260. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014260.
8
Mismatch between health-care professionals' and patients' views on a diabetes patient decision aid: a qualitative study.医疗保健专业人员与患者对糖尿病患者决策辅助工具看法的差异:一项定性研究。
Health Expect. 2016 Apr;19(2):427-36. doi: 10.1111/hex.12366. Epub 2015 Apr 6.
9
Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of a Mobile Insulin Titration Intervention for Patients With Uncontrolled Diabetes: A Qualitative Analysis.移动胰岛素滴定干预在控制不佳的糖尿病患者中的实施障碍和促进因素:定性分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jul 31;7(7):e13906. doi: 10.2196/13906.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the implementation of an insulin patient decision aid for patients with type 2 diabetes in an academic primary care clinic in Malaysia: a mixed method study.马来西亚一家学术性初级保健诊所中2型糖尿病患者胰岛素患者决策辅助工具实施情况的评估:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Mar 27;25(1):450. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12588-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of an Implementation Strategy for Patient Decision Aids in Rheumatoid Arthritis Through Application of the Behavior Change Wheel.通过应用行为改变轮制定类风湿性关节炎患者决策辅助工具的实施策略
ACR Open Rheumatol. 2021 May;3(5):312-323. doi: 10.1002/acr2.11250. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
2
Factors influencing implementation of an insulin patient decision aid at public health clinics in Malaysia: A qualitative study.影响马来西亚公共卫生诊所胰岛素患者决策辅助工具实施的因素:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 30;15(12):e0244645. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244645. eCollection 2020.
3
What Works in Implementing Patient Decision Aids in Routine Clinical Settings? A Rapid Realist Review and Update from the International Patient Decision Aid Standards Collaboration.
在常规临床环境中实施患者决策辅助工具的有效方法有哪些?国际患者决策辅助标准协作的快速务实综述和更新。
Med Decis Making. 2021 Oct;41(7):907-937. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20978208. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
4
Does the use of patient decision aids lead to cost savings? a systematic review.使用患者决策辅助工具是否能节省成本?系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 16;10(11):e036834. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036834.
5
Implementation Mapping: Using Intervention Mapping to Develop Implementation Strategies.实施映射:运用干预映射法制定实施策略
Front Public Health. 2019 Jun 18;7:158. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00158. eCollection 2019.
6
What will make patients use a patient decision aid? A qualitative study on patients' perspectives on implementation barriers and facilitators.什么会促使患者使用患者决策辅助工具?一项关于患者对实施障碍和促进因素看法的定性研究。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2020 Jun;26(3):755-764. doi: 10.1111/jep.13161. Epub 2019 May 21.
7
A methodology for generating a tailored implementation blueprint: an exemplar from a youth residential setting.一种生成定制化实施蓝图的方法:来自青年住宿环境的范例。
Implement Sci. 2018 May 16;13(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0761-6.
8
Development of a tailored strategy to improve postpartum hemorrhage guideline adherence.制定一项针对性策略,以提高产后出血指南的依从性。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Feb 8;18(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1676-6.
9
"Provoking conversations": case studies of organizations where Option Grid™ decision aids have become 'normalized'.“引发对话”:关于Option Grid™决策辅助工具已实现“常态化”的组织的案例研究
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Aug 18;17(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0517-2.
10
Implementing shared decision making in the NHS: lessons from the MAGIC programme.在英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)中实施共同决策:来自MAGIC项目的经验教训。
BMJ. 2017 Apr 18;357:j1744. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j1744.