• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者居家运动康复管理的移动应用:可用性研究。

Mobile App for Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases During Home-Based Exercise Care: Usability Study.

机构信息

Department of Industrial Design, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

出版信息

JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Nov 15;11:e60049. doi: 10.2196/60049.

DOI:10.2196/60049
PMID:39546767
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11607552/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Digital health tools have demonstrated promise in the treatment and self-management of chronic diseases while also serving as an important means for reducing the workload of health care professionals (HCPs) and enhancing the quality of care. However, these tools often merely undergo large-scale testing or enter the market without undergoing rigorous user experience analysis in the early stages of their development, leading to frequent instances of low use or failure.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to assess the usability of and satisfaction with a mobile app designed for the clinical monitoring of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease undergoing pulmonary rehabilitation at home.

METHODS

This study used a mixed methods approach involving two key stakeholders-patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and HCPs-across three phases: (1) mobile app mock-up design, (2) usability testing, and (3) satisfaction evaluation. Using convenience sampling, participants were grouped as HCPs (n=12) and patients (n=18). Each received a tablet with mock-ups for usability testing through interviews, with audio recordings transcribed and analyzed anonymously in NVivo12.0, focusing on mock-up features and usability insights. Task difficulty was rated from 1 (very easy) to 5 (very difficult), with noncompletion deemed a critical error. Usability satisfaction was measured on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).

RESULTS

The research indicated a notable difference in app usability perceptions: 66% (8/12) of HCPs found tasks "very easy," compared to only 22% (4/18) of patients. Despite this, no participant made critical errors or withdrew, and satisfaction was high. HCPs completed tasks in about 20 minutes, while patients took 30. Older adults faced challenges with touch screens and scroll menus, suggesting the need for intuitive design aids like auditory support and visual health progress indicators, such as graphs. HCPs noted potential data delays affecting service, while non-native-speaking caregivers faced interpretation challenges. A secure pairing system for privacy in teleconsultations proved difficult for older users; a simpler icon-based system is recommended. This study highlights the need to consider stakeholder abilities in medical app design to enhance function implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

Most HCPs (11/12, 91%) found the app intuitive, though they recommended adding icons to show patient progress to support clinical decisions. In contrast, 62% (11/18) of patients struggled with tablet navigation, especially with connectivity features. To ensure equitable access, the design should accommodate older users with diverse abilities. Despite challenges, both groups reported high satisfaction, with patients expressing a willingness to learn and recommending the app. These positive usability evaluations suggest that, with design improvements, such apps could see increased use in home-based care.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f11f/11607552/7c89e038e2ac/humanfactors_v11i1e60049_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f11f/11607552/7c89e038e2ac/humanfactors_v11i1e60049_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f11f/11607552/7c89e038e2ac/humanfactors_v11i1e60049_fig1.jpg
摘要

背景

数字健康工具在慢性病的治疗和自我管理方面显示出了潜力,同时也是减轻医疗保健专业人员(HCP)工作量和提高护理质量的重要手段。然而,这些工具在开发的早期阶段往往只是经过大规模测试或进入市场,而没有经过严格的用户体验分析,导致使用率低或失败的情况经常发生。

目的

本研究旨在评估一款专为在家中接受肺康复治疗的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者进行临床监测而设计的移动应用程序的可用性和满意度。

方法

本研究采用混合方法,涉及三个阶段的两个关键利益相关者-慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者和 HCP:(1)移动应用程序模拟设计,(2)可用性测试,(3)满意度评估。使用便利抽样法,将参与者分为 HCP 组(n=12)和患者组(n=18)。每组均收到一台带有模拟测试的平板电脑,通过访谈进行可用性测试,将音频记录转录并在 NVivo12.0 中匿名分析,重点关注模拟测试功能和可用性见解。任务难度从 1(非常容易)到 5(非常困难)进行评分,未完成被视为关键错误。使用 5 点李克特量表从 1(非常不同意)到 5(非常同意)来衡量可用性满意度。

结果

研究表明,应用程序的可用性感知存在显著差异:66%(8/12)的 HCP 认为任务“非常容易”,而只有 22%(4/18)的患者认为任务“非常容易”。尽管如此,没有参与者出现关键错误或退出,并且满意度很高。HCP 完成任务大约需要 20 分钟,而患者则需要 30 分钟。老年患者在使用触摸屏和滚动菜单方面遇到了挑战,这表明需要直观的设计辅助工具,如听觉支持和可视化健康进度指标,如图表。HCP 注意到潜在的数据延迟会影响服务,而非母语为英语的护理人员则面临解释挑战。用于远程咨询的隐私安全配对系统对老年用户来说很难操作;建议使用更简单的基于图标的系统。本研究强调了在医疗应用程序设计中考虑利益相关者能力的重要性,以增强功能实现。

结论

大多数 HCP(11/12,91%)认为该应用程序直观,尽管他们建议添加图标以显示患者的进展,以支持临床决策。相比之下,62%(11/18)的患者在平板电脑导航方面遇到了困难,尤其是在连接功能方面。为确保公平访问,设计应适应具有不同能力的老年用户。尽管存在挑战,但两组都报告了很高的满意度,患者表示愿意学习并推荐该应用程序。这些积极的可用性评估表明,通过改进设计,这种应用程序在家中护理中可能会得到更广泛的使用。

相似文献

1
Mobile App for Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases During Home-Based Exercise Care: Usability Study.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者居家运动康复管理的移动应用:可用性研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Nov 15;11:e60049. doi: 10.2196/60049.
2
Usability of a mobile application for the clinical follow-up of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and home oxygen therapy.移动应用程序在慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者临床随访和家庭氧疗中的可用性。
Int J Med Inform. 2023 Jul;175:105089. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105089. Epub 2023 May 5.
3
Evaluating User Experience and Satisfaction in a Concussion Rehabilitation App: Usability Study.评估一款脑震荡康复应用程序中的用户体验和满意度:可用性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Apr 11;9:e67275. doi: 10.2196/67275.
4
User-Centered Design and Usability of Voxe as a Pediatric Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Platform: Mixed Methods Evaluation Study.以用户为中心的设计与可用性研究:Voxe 作为儿科电子患者报告结局测量平台的混合方法评估研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Sep 19;11:e57984. doi: 10.2196/57984.
5
Mobile Health App for Adolescent Asthma Self-Management: Development and Usability Study of the Pulmonary Education and Knowledge Mobile Asthma Action Plan.用于青少年哮喘自我管理的移动健康应用程序:肺部教育与知识移动哮喘行动计划的开发与可用性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Apr 24;9:e64212. doi: 10.2196/64212.
6
Smartphone Apps to Support Falls Rehabilitation Exercise: App Development and Usability and Acceptability Study.智能手机应用程序支持跌倒康复锻炼:应用程序开发以及可用性和可接受性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Sep 28;8(9):e15460. doi: 10.2196/15460.
7
Exploring the Feasibility of a 5-Week mHealth Intervention to Enhance Physical Activity and an Active, Healthy Lifestyle in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Mixed Methods Study.探索为期5周的移动健康干预措施在社区居住的老年人中增强身体活动及促进积极健康生活方式的可行性:混合方法研究
JMIR Aging. 2025 Jan 27;8:e63348. doi: 10.2196/63348.
8
Researched Apps Used in Dementia Care for People Living With Dementia and Their Informal Caregivers: Systematic Review on App Features, Security, and Usability.用于痴呆症患者及其非专业照护者的痴呆症照护研究型应用程序:关于应用程序功能、安全性和可用性的系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 12;25:e46188. doi: 10.2196/46188.
9
Evaluating the Usability and Quality of a Clinical Mobile App for Assisting Physicians in Head Computed Tomography Scan Ordering: Mixed Methods Study.评估一款用于协助医师下达头部计算机断层扫描医嘱的临床移动应用程序的可用性和质量:混合方法研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Sep 9;11:e55790. doi: 10.2196/55790.
10
Development of a Mobile App to Support Self-management of Anxiety and Depression in African American Women: Usability Study.开发一款支持非裔美国女性焦虑和抑郁自我管理的移动应用程序:可用性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Aug 17;5(8):e24393. doi: 10.2196/24393.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital health technologies for improving the management of people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.用于改善慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者管理的数字健康技术。
Front Digit Health. 2025 Aug 6;7:1640585. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1640585. eCollection 2025.
2
Optimizing mobile app design for older adults: systematic review of age-friendly design.优化老年人移动应用程序设计:对年龄友好型设计的系统评价
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2025 Aug 14;37(1):248. doi: 10.1007/s40520-025-03157-7.
3
Acceptability of a digital pulmonary rehabilitation app as an adjunct or alternative to usual care for people with chronic lung diseases: A qualitative study of patients' views and experiences.

本文引用的文献

1
Feasibility and Design Factors for Home-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation of Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Chronic Lung Diseases Based on a People-Object-Environment Framework: Qualitative Interview Study.基于人-物-环境框架的慢性阻塞性肺疾病和慢性肺部疾病患者居家肺康复的可行性和设计因素:定性访谈研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Mar 7;11:e51150. doi: 10.2196/51150.
2
Smart product-service systems in the healthcare industry: Intelligent connected products and stakeholder communication drive digital health service adoption.医疗保健行业中的智能产品服务系统:智能互联产品与利益相关者沟通推动数字健康服务的采用。
Heliyon. 2023 Jan 25;9(2):e13137. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13137. eCollection 2023 Feb.
3
数字肺康复应用程序作为慢性肺病患者常规护理的辅助手段或替代方案的可接受性:对患者观点和体验的定性研究
Chron Respir Dis. 2025 Jan-Dec;22:14799731251365632. doi: 10.1177/14799731251365632. Epub 2025 Aug 13.
4
Current status of older people with chronic diseases adopting digital health technologies: A scoping review.患有慢性病的老年人采用数字健康技术的现状:一项范围综述。
Digit Health. 2025 Jun 4;11:20552076251348578. doi: 10.1177/20552076251348578. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
Burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and its attributable risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.
204 个国家和地区 1990-2019 年慢性阻塞性肺疾病负担及其可归因危险因素:2019 年全球疾病负担研究结果。
BMJ. 2022 Jul 27;378:e069679. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-069679.
4
Using an E-Health Application for Post-operative Monitoring After Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Feasibility Study.使用电子健康应用程序进行腹股沟疝修补术后监测:一项可行性研究。
World J Surg. 2023 Jan;47(1):182-189. doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06590-1. Epub 2022 May 23.
5
Telehealth utilization during the Covid-19 pandemic: A systematic review.新冠疫情期间的远程医疗应用:一项系统综述。
Comput Biol Med. 2021 Nov;138:104878. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104878. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
6
Cross Sectional E-Health Evaluation Study for Telemedicine and M-Health Approaches in Monitoring COVID-19 Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).横断面电子健康评估研究:远程医疗和移动医疗在监测 COVID-19 合并慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中的应用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 12;18(16):8513. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168513.
7
Prevalence and attributable health burden of chronic respiratory diseases, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.1990-2017 年慢性呼吸道疾病的流行情况和可归因健康负担:2017 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Jun;8(6):585-596. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30105-3.
8
Global Burden of Chronic Respiratory Diseases.全球慢性呼吸系统疾病负担。
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2020 Aug;33(4):171-177. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2019.1576. Epub 2020 May 18.
9
An overview of clinical decision support systems: benefits, risks, and strategies for success.临床决策支持系统概述:益处、风险及成功策略。
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Feb 6;3:17. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-0221-y. eCollection 2020.
10
A systematic review of the adoption and acceptance of eHealth in Saudi Arabia: Views of multiple stakeholders.沙特阿拉伯电子健康采纳和接受的系统评价:多方利益相关者的观点。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Aug;128:7-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.05.007. Epub 2019 May 13.