Suppr超能文献

评估协作机器人中的操作员压力:一种多模态方法。

Assessing operator stress in collaborative robotics: A multimodal approach.

作者信息

Borghi Simone, Ruo Andrea, Sabattini Lorenzo, Peruzzini Margherita, Villani Valeria

机构信息

Department of Engineering "Enzo Ferrari", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.

Department of Sciences and Methods for Engineering, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.

出版信息

Appl Ergon. 2025 Feb;123:104418. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104418. Epub 2024 Nov 16.

Abstract

In the era of Industry 4.0, the study of Human-Robot Collaboration (HRC) in advancing modern manufacturing and automation is paramount. An operator approaching a collaborative robot (cobot) may have feelings of distrust, and experience discomfort and stress, especially during the early stages of training. Human factors cannot be neglected: for efficient implementation, the complex psycho-physiological state and responses of the operator must be taken into consideration. In this study, volunteers were asked to carry out a set of cobot programming tasks, while several physiological signals, such as electroencephalogram (EEG), electrocardiogram (ECG), Galvanic skin response (GSR), and facial expressions were recorded. In addition, a subjective questionnaire (NASA-TLX) was administered at the end, to assess if the derived physiological parameters are related to the subjective perception of stress. Parameters exhibiting a higher degree of alignment with subjective perception are mean Theta (76.67%), Alpha (70.53%) and Beta (67.65%) power extracted from EEG, recovery time (72.86%) and rise time (71.43%) extracted from GSR and heart rate variability (HRV) metrics PNN25 (71.58%), SDNN (70.53%), PNN50 (68.95%) and RMSSD (66.84%). Parameters extracted from raw RR Intervals appear to be more variable and less accurate (42.11%) so as recorded emotions (51.43%).

摘要

在工业4.0时代,研究人机协作(HRC)对推动现代制造业和自动化至关重要。操作人员接近协作机器人(cobot)时可能会产生不信任感,并体验到不适和压力,尤其是在训练的早期阶段。人为因素不可忽视:为了有效实施,必须考虑操作人员复杂的心理生理状态和反应。在本研究中,志愿者被要求执行一组cobot编程任务,同时记录了几种生理信号,如脑电图(EEG)、心电图(ECG)、皮肤电反应(GSR)和面部表情。此外,最后还进行了一份主观问卷(NASA-TLX),以评估所导出的生理参数是否与压力的主观感受相关。与主观感受表现出更高程度一致性的参数有从脑电图中提取的平均θ波(76.67%)、α波(70.53%)和β波(67.65%)功率,从GSR中提取的恢复时间(72.86%)和上升时间(71.43%),以及心率变异性(HRV)指标PNN25(71.58%)、SDNN(70.53%)、PNN50(68.95%)和RMSSD(66.84%)。从原始RR间期提取的参数似乎变化更大且准确性更低(42.11%),记录的情绪也是如此(51.43%)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验