• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多中心调查和单中心观察研究:重症监护病房水槽使用行为——需要培训以最小化风险。

A multicentric survey and single-centre observational study of usage behaviour of sinks in intensive care: training is needed to minimize risk.

机构信息

Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2024 Nov 17;13(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s13756-024-01493-3.

DOI:10.1186/s13756-024-01493-3
PMID:39551779
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11571737/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Sinks have been introduced near patients to improve hand hygiene as part of infection prevention and control measures. However, sinks are a known reservoir for gram-negative bacterial pathogens in particular and their removal to prevent bacterial infections in intensive care patients is currently recommended by several international guidelines.

METHODS

Healthcare workers (HCWs) in 15 intensive care units (ICUs) in Germany were given the opportunity to complete an anonymous survey on the use of sinks between August 2022 and January 2023. Observations were then made in three participating ICUs to determine the frequency and reason for contact with the sink.

RESULTS

258 questionnaires were returned (nurses 87%). 90% found it useful to very useful to have a sink in the patient room, and 56% reported using it daily for hand hygiene. We observed 33 contacts between nurses and sinks over 17 h. In 20/33 (60%) cases, the sink was used for waste disposal. In 3/33 (10%) it was used for hand washing.

DISCUSSION

Sinks are still used for daily care in intensive care units. Educational Interventions in existing buildings to minimise risk through "sink hygiene" (i.e. separation of sinks for water disposal and uptake) can make an important contribution to infection prevention.

摘要

简介

为改善手卫生,作为感染预防和控制措施的一部分,在患者附近设置了水槽。然而,水槽是革兰氏阴性细菌病原体的已知储存库,目前有几项国际指南建议去除水槽以防止重症监护患者的细菌感染。

方法

2022 年 8 月至 2023 年 1 月,德国 15 个重症监护病房(ICU)的医护人员有机会完成关于水槽使用情况的匿名调查。然后在三个参与的 ICU 进行观察,以确定与水槽接触的频率和原因。

结果

共收回 258 份问卷(护士 87%)。90%的人认为在病房内设置水槽非常有用,56%的人报告每天使用水槽进行手部卫生。我们在 17 小时内观察到护士与水槽之间的 33 次接触。在 20/33(60%)的情况下,水槽用于废物处理。在 3/33(10%)的情况下,它用于洗手。

讨论

水槽仍在重症监护病房中用于日常护理。在现有建筑物中进行教育干预,通过“水槽卫生”(即分离用于废水处理和摄取的水槽),可以为感染预防做出重要贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71d6/11571737/f735b48f416e/13756_2024_1493_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71d6/11571737/f735b48f416e/13756_2024_1493_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71d6/11571737/f735b48f416e/13756_2024_1493_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A multicentric survey and single-centre observational study of usage behaviour of sinks in intensive care: training is needed to minimize risk.多中心调查和单中心观察研究:重症监护病房水槽使用行为——需要培训以最小化风险。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2024 Nov 17;13(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s13756-024-01493-3.
2
Impact of sink location on hand hygiene compliance after care of patients with Clostridium difficile infection: a cross-sectional study.艰难梭菌感染患者护理后水槽位置对手卫生依从性的影响:一项横断面研究
BMC Infect Dis. 2016 May 16;16:203. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1535-x.
3
A prospective multicentre surveillance study to investigate the risk associated with contaminated sinks in the intensive care unit.一项针对重症监护病房污染水槽相关风险的前瞻性多中心监测研究。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Sep;27(9):1347.e9-1347.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.02.018. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
4
Assessment of healthcare worker's hand hygiene and infection prevention practices of their personal belongings in a healthcare setting: a survey in pre COVID-19 era and literature review on standard disinfection practices.医疗机构中医护人员手部卫生及个人物品感染预防措施的评估:COVID-19 大流行前时代的一项调查及标准消毒措施的文献综述
J Prev Med Hyg. 2021 Apr 29;62(1):E104-E109. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2021.62.1.1742. eCollection 2021 Mar.
5
Effectiveness over time of a multimodal intervention to improve compliance with standard hygiene precautions in an intensive care unit of a large teaching hospital.一项多模式干预措施在提高大型教学医院重症监护病房标准卫生预防措施依从性方面的长期效果。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019 May 31;8:92. doi: 10.1186/s13756-019-0544-0. eCollection 2019.
6
Assessing hand hygiene compliance among healthcare workers in six Intensive Care Units.评估六个重症监护病房医护人员的手卫生依从性。
J Prev Med Hyg. 2017 Sep;58(3):E231-E237.
7
Comparison of hand hygiene compliance among healthcare workers in Intensive care units and wards of COVID-19: A large scale multicentric study in India.比较 COVID-19 重症监护病房和病房中医护人员手卫生依从性:印度一项大规模多中心研究。
Am J Infect Control. 2023 Mar;51(3):304-312. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2022.09.028. Epub 2022 Oct 9.
8
Contaminated sinks in intensive care units: an underestimated source of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in the patient environment.重症监护病房污染水槽:患者环境中产Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase 的肠杆菌科细菌的一个被低估的来源。
J Hosp Infect. 2013 Oct;85(2):106-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2013.07.006. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
9
Predictors of hand hygiene attitudes among Saudi healthcare workers of the intensive care unit in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯重症监护病房医护人员手卫生态度的预测因素。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 27;14(1):19857. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68494-5.
10
Improvement of hand hygiene compliance among health care workers in intensive care units.重症监护病房医护人员手部卫生依从性的改善
J Prev Med Hyg. 2019 Mar 29;60(1):E31-E35. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2019.60.1.918. eCollection 2019 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementation and barriers to waterless care: a questionnaire study of infection prevention and control practitioners, clinicians, and engineers.无水护理的实施和障碍:感染预防和控制从业者、临床医生和工程师的问卷调查研究。
J Hosp Infect. 2024 Oct;152:122-125. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2024.08.003. Epub 2024 Aug 16.
2
Infection prevention and control policy implementation for CPE: a cross-sectional national survey of healthcare workers reveals knowledge gaps and suboptimal practices.CPE 的感染预防和控制政策实施:一项针对医护人员的全国横断面调查揭示了知识差距和不适当的做法。
J Hosp Infect. 2024 Mar;145:148-154. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2023.12.007. Epub 2023 Dec 23.
3
Sinks in patient rooms in ICUs are associated with higher rates of hospital-acquired infection: a retrospective analysis of 552 ICUs.
重症监护病房(ICU)患者房间内的水槽与更高的医院获得性感染率相关:对 552 家 ICU 的回顾性分析。
J Hosp Infect. 2023 Sep;139:99-105. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2023.05.018. Epub 2023 Jun 10.
4
[The structural and spatial design of German intensive care units from the point of view of infection control measures : Survey among ICU-KISS participants].[从感染控制措施角度看德国重症监护病房的结构与空间设计:对ICU-KISS参与者的调查]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2024 Feb;119(1):27-38. doi: 10.1007/s00063-023-01022-x. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
5
[DIVI-Recommendations on the infrastruture of adult intensive care units].[DIVI - 关于成人重症监护病房基础设施的建议]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2023 Oct;118(7):564-575. doi: 10.1007/s00063-023-01021-y.
6
Limiting spread of VIM-positive Pseudomonas aeruginosa from colonized sink drains in a tertiary care hospital: A before-and-after study.限制定植于三所教学医院水槽排水管中的产 VIM 阳性铜绿假单胞菌的传播:一项前后对照研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 24;18(3):e0282090. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282090. eCollection 2023.
7
Hospital water as the source of healthcare-associated infection and antimicrobial-resistant organisms.医院用水作为医源性感染和抗微生物药物耐药生物体的来源。
Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2022 Aug 1;35(4):339-345. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000842. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
8
Effect of antiseptic bathing with chlorhexidine or octenidine on central line-associated bloodstream infections in intensive care patients: a cluster-randomized controlled trial.氯己定或奥替尼啶抗菌沐浴对重症监护患者中心静脉相关血流感染的影响:一项集群随机对照试验。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2022 Jun;28(6):825-831. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.12.023. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
9
A prospective multicentre surveillance study to investigate the risk associated with contaminated sinks in the intensive care unit.一项针对重症监护病房污染水槽相关风险的前瞻性多中心监测研究。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Sep;27(9):1347.e9-1347.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.02.018. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
10
[Not Available].[无可用内容]。
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2020 Apr;63(4):484-501. doi: 10.1007/s00103-020-03118-7.