Suppr超能文献

野生型复发性卵巢癌患者二线维持治疗中尼拉帕利单药治疗与主动监测的真实世界总生存期

Real-world overall survival in second-line maintenance niraparib monotherapy versus active surveillance in patients with wild-type recurrent ovarian cancer.

作者信息

Coleman Robert L, Perhanidis Jessica A, Kalilani Linda, Zimmerman Nicole M, Golembesky Amanda, Moore Kathleen N

机构信息

Texas Oncology, US Oncology Network and GOG Foundation, 9180 Pinecroft Drive, Suite 600, The Woodlands, TX 77380, USA.

GSK, Waltham, MA, USA.

出版信息

Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2024 Nov 14;16:17588359241292272. doi: 10.1177/17588359241292272. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The NOVA study (NCT01847274) compared niraparib with placebo as a maintenance treatment for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer (OC) but was not powered to detect an overall survival (OS) improvement.

OBJECTIVE

To compare OS in a real-world population of patients with wild-type (wt) recurrent OC who received second-line maintenance (2LM) niraparib monotherapy versus active surveillance (AS).

DESIGN

A retrospective study using a US-based nationwide deidentified electronic health record-derived database.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with epithelial OC (January 1, 2011-May 31, 2021) who completed second-line (2L) therapy (January 1, 2017-March 2, 2022) and were wt were included. A NOVA study-like subpopulation included patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0-1 and platinum-sensitive disease. Patients were assigned to 2LM niraparib or AS cohorts. Follow-up was measured from the index date (2L non-maintenance therapy end) until the first of study end (May 31, 2022), last clinical activity, or death. Median OS (mOS) and hazard ratios were estimated with an emulated trial methodology.

RESULTS

The overall population comprised 199 patients in the 2LM niraparib monotherapy cohort and 707 patients in the AS cohort; the NOVA study-like subpopulation included 123 patients in the 2LM niraparib monotherapy cohort and 143 in the AS cohort. Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar in both populations. Overall, adjusted mOS was 24.1 months for the 2LM niraparib monotherapy cohort versus 18.4 months for the AS cohort (hazard ratio, 0.8; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.7-0.9). In the NOVA study-like subpopulation, adjusted mOS was 28.1 months for the 2LM niraparib monotherapy cohort versus 21.5 months for the AS cohort (hazard ratio, 0.6; 95% CI: 0.5-0.9).

CONCLUSION

These results provide important real-world OS data for patients with recurrent wt OC who received niraparib monotherapy compared with patients receiving AS.

摘要

背景

NOVA研究(NCT01847274)比较了尼拉帕利与安慰剂作为复发性卵巢癌(OC)患者维持治疗的效果,但未设定检测总生存期(OS)改善情况的效能。

目的

比较接受二线维持(2LM)尼拉帕利单药治疗与主动监测(AS)的野生型(wt)复发性OC患者在真实世界中的总生存期。

设计

一项回顾性研究,使用美国全国性的去识别化电子健康记录衍生数据库。

方法

纳入2011年1月1日至2021年5月31日诊断为上皮性OC且在2017年1月1日至2022年3月2日完成二线(2L)治疗且为野生型的患者。一个类似NOVA研究的亚组包括东部肿瘤协作组体能状态评分为0 - 1且铂敏感疾病的患者。患者被分配到2LM尼拉帕利或AS队列。随访从索引日期(2L非维持治疗结束)开始,直至研究结束(2022年5月31日)、最后临床活动或死亡。采用模拟试验方法估计中位总生存期(mOS)和风险比。

结果

2LM尼拉帕利单药治疗队列中有199例患者,AS队列中有707例患者;类似NOVA研究的亚组中,2LM尼拉帕利单药治疗队列中有123例患者,AS队列中有143例患者。两个队列的人口统计学和临床特征相似。总体而言,2LM尼拉帕利单药治疗队列的调整后mOS为24.1个月,而AS队列的调整后mOS为18.4个月(风险比,0.8;95%置信区间[CI]:0.7 - 0.9)。在类似NOVA研究的亚组中,2LM尼拉帕利单药治疗队列的调整后mOS为28.1个月,而AS队列的调整后mOS为21.5个月(风险比,0.6;95%CI:0.5 - 0.9)。

结论

这些结果为接受尼拉帕利单药治疗的复发性野生型OC患者与接受主动监测的患者提供了重要的真实世界总生存期数据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3b6/11565610/9166cf910eb7/10.1177_17588359241292272-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验