Liburkina Ruzana
Faculty of Social Sciences, Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor-W.-Adorno-Platz 6, 60323 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Biosocieties. 2024;19(4):595-612. doi: 10.1057/s41292-024-00328-z. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
Following recent discussions around suspended life, this paper focuses on an endeavor that sought to arrest biological material in time and space and render it available on demand. It depicts the attempt to establish a collection of cryopreserved donated cells. The study offers rare insights into how this initiative was at odds with familiar politics significant in its field, those of innovation and preparedness, and therefore was suspended itself. In identifying parallels with accounts of unsuccessful biobanks, the paper makes a case for the analytical value of considering ill-fated projects of suspension along with those that prosper and attract public attention. The case of a novel cryo-collection, in particular, demonstrates how the idea and practice of suspension only gathers political momentum when it serves other well-established rationales. As such, it prompts two important conclusions. First, the power to arrest life as it comes with cryotechnologies is much more likely to unravel in entrenched constellations than to carry transformative or disruptive potential. Second, however, the paper also exemplifies that projects of suspension are not necessarily doomed to serve hegemonic ways of governing life. It advocates for preventing such mismatches from falling into oblivion.
在近期围绕“暂停生命”展开讨论之后,本文聚焦于一项旨在将生物材料在时间和空间上加以留存并按需取用的努力。它描述了建立一个冷冻保存的捐赠细胞库的尝试。该研究罕见地揭示了这一举措如何与该领域中重要的常见政治因素,即创新和准备方面的因素相悖,从而导致其自身被暂停。通过找出与失败的生物样本库案例的相似之处,本文论证了将命运多舛的暂停项目与那些繁荣且吸引公众关注的项目一同考虑所具有的分析价值。特别是一个新型冷冻样本库的案例,展示了暂停的理念和实践只有在服务于其他既定的基本原理时才会积聚政治动力。由此得出两个重要结论。其一,冷冻技术所带来的留存生命的能力,在既定格局中更有可能瓦解,而非具有变革性或颠覆性潜力。其二,然而,本文也例证了暂停项目不一定注定要服务于统治生命的霸权方式。它主张防止此类不匹配被遗忘。