• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Are there unique facets of therapeutic alliance for users of digital mental health interventions? An examination with the eHealth Therapeutic Alliance Inventory.数字心理健康干预使用者的治疗联盟是否有独特的方面?一项使用电子健康治疗联盟量表的调查。
Internet Interv. 2024 Oct 28;38:100783. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2024.100783. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Therapeutic Relationship in eHealth-A Pilot Study of Similarities and Differences between the Online Program Priovi and Therapists Treating Borderline Personality Disorder.电子健康中的治疗关系——Priovi 在线项目与治疗边缘型人格障碍的治疗师之间异同的初步研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 3;17(17):6436. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176436.
3
Enlight: A Comprehensive Quality and Therapeutic Potential Evaluation Tool for Mobile and Web-Based eHealth Interventions.Enlight:一款用于基于移动和网络的电子健康干预措施的综合质量与治疗潜力评估工具。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Mar 21;19(3):e82. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7270.
4
Examining Predictors of Real-World User Engagement with Self-Guided eHealth Interventions: Analysis of Mobile Apps and Websites Using a Novel Dataset.考察现实世界中用户对自我引导式电子健康干预措施的参与度预测因素:使用新数据集对移动应用程序和网站进行分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Dec 14;20(12):e11491. doi: 10.2196/11491.
5
How a Fully Automated eHealth Program Simulates Three Therapeutic Processes: A Case Study.一个全自动化电子健康项目如何模拟三种治疗过程:一项案例研究
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jun 28;18(6):e176. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5415.
6
Therapeutic Alliance With a Fully Automated Mobile Phone and Web-Based Intervention: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.与全自动化手机和基于网络的干预措施建立治疗联盟:一项随机对照试验的二次分析。
JMIR Ment Health. 2016 Feb 25;3(1):e10. doi: 10.2196/mental.4656.
7
The therapeutic alliance between the child, parents, and health professionals.儿童、家长和卫生专业人员之间的治疗联盟。
Handb Clin Neurol. 2020;174:323-332. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64148-9.00023-5.
8
An intervention for parents with severe personality difficulties whose children have mental health problems: a feasibility RCT.一项针对有严重人格障碍且其子女有心理健康问题的父母的干预措施:一项可行性 RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Mar;24(14):1-188. doi: 10.3310/hta24140.
9
The Therapeutic Alliance in Digital Mental Health Interventions for Serious Mental Illnesses: Narrative Review.严重精神疾病数字心理健康干预中的治疗联盟:叙事综述
JMIR Ment Health. 2020 Aug 7;7(8):e17204. doi: 10.2196/17204.
10
Exploring the Use of the Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy and the Persuasive System Design Model in Defining Parent-Focused eHealth Interventions: Scoping Review.探索行为改变技术分类法和说服系统设计模型在定义以父母为中心的电子健康干预措施中的应用:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 21;25:e42083. doi: 10.2196/42083.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Mechanisms of Action on Adherence and Outcomes in Self-Guided Digital Mental Health Interventions: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial With Mediation Analysis.自我指导的数字心理健康干预中作用机制对依从性和结果的影响:一项带有中介分析的随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 May 21;14:e71238. doi: 10.2196/71238.
2
Does the Digital Therapeutic Alliance Exist? Integrative Review.数字疗法联盟是否存在?综合综述。
JMIR Ment Health. 2025 Feb 7;12:e69294. doi: 10.2196/69294.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of therapeutic persuasiveness on engagement and outcomes in unguided interventions: A randomized pilot trial of a digital parent training program for child behavior problems.治疗说服力对无指导干预中参与度和结果的影响:一项针对儿童行为问题的数字家长培训项目的随机试点试验。
Internet Interv. 2023 Oct 4;34:100680. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2023.100680. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Delivery of a Mental Health Intervention for Chronic Pain Through an Artificial Intelligence-Enabled App (Wysa): Protocol for a Prospective Pilot Study.通过人工智能应用程序(Wysa)提供慢性疼痛心理健康干预:一项前瞻性试点研究方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Mar 31;11(3):e36910. doi: 10.2196/36910.
3
Alliance With an Unguided Smartphone App: Validation of the Digital Working Alliance Inventory.与非引导式智能手机应用程序结盟:数字工作联盟清单的验证。
Assessment. 2022 Sep;29(6):1331-1345. doi: 10.1177/10731911211015310. Epub 2021 May 18.
4
Evidence of Human-Level Bonds Established With a Digital Conversational Agent: Cross-sectional, Retrospective Observational Study.与数字对话代理建立的人类水平情感联系的证据:横断面回顾性观察研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2021 May 11;5(5):e27868. doi: 10.2196/27868.
5
The Digital Therapeutic Alliance and Human-Computer Interaction.数字治疗联盟与人机交互
JMIR Ment Health. 2020 Dec 29;7(12):e21895. doi: 10.2196/21895.
6
Therapeutic Alliance in Technology-Based Interventions for the Treatment of Depression: Systematic Review.基于技术的抑郁症治疗干预中的治疗联盟:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 11;22(6):e17195. doi: 10.2196/17195.
7
Technology-Based Mental Health Treatment and the Impact on the Therapeutic Alliance.基于技术的心理健康治疗及其对治疗联盟的影响。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019 Jul 8;21(8):76. doi: 10.1007/s11920-019-1055-7.
8
Identifying research priorities for digital technology in mental health care: results of the James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership.确定精神卫生保健中数字技术的研究重点:詹姆斯·林德联盟优先事项设定合作项目的结果
Lancet Psychiatry. 2018 Oct;5(10):845-854. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30296-7. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
9
The alliance in adult psychotherapy: A meta-analytic synthesis.成人心理治疗中的联盟:一项荟萃分析综合研究。
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2018 Dec;55(4):316-340. doi: 10.1037/pst0000172. Epub 2018 May 24.
10
Assessing Therapeutic Alliance in the Context of mHealth Interventions for Mental Health Problems: Development of the Mobile Agnew Relationship Measure (mARM) Questionnaire.在心理健康问题的移动健康干预背景下评估治疗联盟:移动阿格纽关系量表(mARM)问卷的开发。
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Apr 19;20(4):e90. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8252.

数字心理健康干预使用者的治疗联盟是否有独特的方面?一项使用电子健康治疗联盟量表的调查。

Are there unique facets of therapeutic alliance for users of digital mental health interventions? An examination with the eHealth Therapeutic Alliance Inventory.

作者信息

Ashur Ohad, Saar Chen R, Brandes Or, Baumel Amit

机构信息

Department of Community Mental Health, University of Haifa, Haifa, IL, Israel.

出版信息

Internet Interv. 2024 Oct 28;38:100783. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2024.100783. eCollection 2024 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.invent.2024.100783
PMID:39552938
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11565397/
Abstract

Therapeutic alliance (TA) is a well-established predictor of clinical outcomes in traditional psychotherapy. However, its association with outcomes in eHealth interventions has been inconsistent, which might be due to the absence of measurements specifically designed to capture TA in eHealth settings. The eHealth Therapeutic Alliance Inventory (ETAI) incorporates conventional as well as unique eHealth TA subscales, enabling to examine the contribution of new facets of TA beyond traditional concepts. This study investigates the predictive contribution of eHealth TA subscales compared to conventional TA subscales on clinical outcomes and evaluates the concurrent criterion validity of the ETAI. The study was conducted within the framework of a randomized controlled trial involving a 10-week digital parent training program aimed at addressing child disruptive behaviors. Parents were randomly assigned to either an enhanced-quality or a standard-quality program. Parents from 68 families completed the ETAI at five weeks' post-program initiation and at the post-intervention phase. The primary outcome was the improvement in child behavior, measured by the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory. Positive Pearson correlations were found between all ETAI subscales covering unique eHealth TA aspects, measured at the 5-week time-point, and improvement in child behavior at post-intervention (  ≥ 0.23,  < 0.03). The conventional TA subscale showed no significant Pearson correlation with improvement in child behavior. When examining the unique contributions of ETAI-subscales to explain the improvement in child behavior, only ETAI-Perceived Emotional Investment subscale was found to have a unique contribution ( = 0.29,  = 0.019). In addition, scores on most ETAI subscales were significantly higher among parents using the enhanced-quality program compared with the standard program (Cohen's  > 0.48), reinforcing ETAI's criterion validity. The development of TA scales that incorporates unique eHealth TA subscales show initial promise in predicting outcomes. Further research is needed to better understand how different factors of eHealth TA relate to clinical outcomes across diverse clinical targets and programs.

摘要

治疗联盟(TA)是传统心理治疗中临床疗效的一个公认预测指标。然而,它与电子健康干预效果的关联并不一致,这可能是由于缺乏专门为在电子健康环境中测量TA而设计的方法。电子健康治疗联盟量表(ETAI)纳入了传统以及独特的电子健康TA子量表,能够检验TA新方面对传统概念的贡献。本研究调查了与传统TA子量表相比,电子健康TA子量表对临床疗效的预测贡献,并评估了ETAI的同时效度。该研究是在一项随机对照试验的框架内进行的,该试验涉及一个为期10周的数字家长培训项目,旨在解决儿童破坏性行为问题。家长被随机分配到高质量或标准质量项目中。来自68个家庭的家长在项目启动后五周和干预后阶段完成了ETAI。主要结果是儿童行为的改善,通过艾伯格儿童行为量表进行测量。在5周时间点测量的涵盖独特电子健康TA方面的所有ETAI子量表与干预后儿童行为的改善之间发现了正皮尔逊相关性(≥0.23,<0.03)。传统TA子量表与儿童行为改善之间未显示出显著的皮尔逊相关性。在检查ETAI子量表对解释儿童行为改善的独特贡献时,仅发现ETAI-感知情感投入子量表有独特贡献(=0.29,=0.019)。此外,与标准项目相比,使用高质量项目的家长在大多数ETAI子量表上的得分显著更高(科恩>0.48),这加强了ETAI的效度。纳入独特电子健康TA子量表的TA量表在预测结果方面显示出初步前景。需要进一步研究以更好地理解电子健康TA的不同因素如何与不同临床目标和项目的临床结果相关。