• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

治疗说服力对无指导干预中参与度和结果的影响:一项针对儿童行为问题的数字家长培训项目的随机试点试验。

The impact of therapeutic persuasiveness on engagement and outcomes in unguided interventions: A randomized pilot trial of a digital parent training program for child behavior problems.

作者信息

Baumel Amit, Brandes Or, Brendryen Håvar, Muench Fred, Kane John M, Saar Chen

机构信息

Department of Community Mental Health, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.

Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Internet Interv. 2023 Oct 4;34:100680. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2023.100680. eCollection 2023 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.invent.2023.100680
PMID:37840647
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10568087/
Abstract

Understanding how to design engaging unguided digital health interventions is key in our ability to utilize digital tools to improve access to care. Therapeutic persuasiveness (TP) is a design concept that relates to how the digital intervention features as a whole should be designed to encourage users to make positive changes in their lives, while reducing the experienced effort required from them to engage in these activities. In our previous work, we examined the user traffic of publicly available programs, finding programs' TP quality to be a reliable, robust, and stable predictor of real-world usage; however, these findings have not been subject to experimental manipulation in a controlled trial. The current study examined the impact of TP quality in digital parent training programs (DPTs) aimed at treating child's behavior problems. We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial comparing two interventions that utilize the same evidence-based content of established DPTs, but that differ in terms of the quality of TP (standard: DPT-STD; enhanced: DPT-TP). Altogether, parents from 88 families who have a child with behavior problems were enrolled in the study. Compared to DPT-STD ( = 43), participants allocated to DPT-TP ( = 45) used the program significantly more ( < 0.001; Cohen's  = 0.91-2.22). In terms of program completion, 68.9 % of DPT-TP participants completed it compared to 27.9 % of DPT-STD participants. Significant differences between the interventions were also found in reported improvements in child behavior problems favoring DPT-TP ( < 0.05; Cohen's  = 0.43-0.54). The results point to the importance of adequate product design and the utilization of conceptual frameworks in order to improve user engagement challenges.

摘要

了解如何设计引人入胜的无指导数字健康干预措施是我们利用数字工具改善医疗服务可及性的关键能力。治疗说服力(TP)是一个设计概念,它涉及数字干预整体特征应如何设计,以鼓励用户在生活中做出积极改变,同时减少他们参与这些活动所需的实际努力。在我们之前的工作中,我们研究了公开可用项目的用户流量,发现项目的TP质量是实际使用情况的可靠、稳健且稳定的预测指标;然而,这些发现尚未在对照试验中进行实验性操作验证。本研究考察了数字家长培训项目(DPT)中TP质量对治疗儿童行为问题的影响。我们进行了一项试点随机对照试验,比较了两种干预措施,这两种措施使用相同的基于既定DPT的循证内容,但在TP质量方面有所不同(标准:DPT-STD;增强:DPT-TP)。共有88个有行为问题儿童的家庭的家长参与了该研究。与DPT-STD组(n = 43)相比,分配到DPT-TP组(n = 45)的参与者对该项目的使用显著更多(p < 0.001;科恩d值 = 0.91 - 2.22)。在项目完成率方面,DPT-TP组的参与者中有68.9%完成了项目,而DPT-STD组的参与者中这一比例为27.9%。在报告的儿童行为问题改善方面,也发现了有利于DPT-TP的干预措施之间的显著差异(p < 0.05;科恩d值 = 0.43 - 0.54)。结果表明,充分的产品设计和概念框架的运用对于应对用户参与挑战至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/597e/10568087/0a9377655322/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/597e/10568087/de37917c29d0/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/597e/10568087/7ee7b5ae67ce/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/597e/10568087/e8f4b154a67f/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/597e/10568087/0a9377655322/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/597e/10568087/de37917c29d0/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/597e/10568087/7ee7b5ae67ce/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/597e/10568087/e8f4b154a67f/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/597e/10568087/0a9377655322/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
The impact of therapeutic persuasiveness on engagement and outcomes in unguided interventions: A randomized pilot trial of a digital parent training program for child behavior problems.治疗说服力对无指导干预中参与度和结果的影响:一项针对儿童行为问题的数字家长培训项目的随机试点试验。
Internet Interv. 2023 Oct 4;34:100680. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2023.100680. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Technology-Assisted Parent Training Programs for Children and Adolescents With Disruptive Behaviors: A Systematic Review.针对有破坏性行为的儿童和青少年的技术辅助家长培训项目:一项系统综述。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2017 Sep/Oct;78(8):e957-e969. doi: 10.4088/JCP.16r11063.
3
Is there a trial bias impacting user engagement with unguided e-mental health interventions? A systematic comparison of published reports and real-world usage of the same programs.未引导的电子心理健康干预措施的使用中是否存在影响用户参与度的试验偏倚?对相同程序的已发表报告和实际使用情况进行系统比较。
Transl Behav Med. 2019 Nov 25;9(6):1020-1033. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibz147.
4
Examining Predictors of Real-World User Engagement with Self-Guided eHealth Interventions: Analysis of Mobile Apps and Websites Using a Novel Dataset.考察现实世界中用户对自我引导式电子健康干预措施的参与度预测因素:使用新数据集对移动应用程序和网站进行分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Dec 14;20(12):e11491. doi: 10.2196/11491.
5
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
6
Supporting Parents & Kids Through Lockdown Experiences (SPARKLE): A digital parenting support app implemented in an ongoing general population cohort study during the COVID-19 pandemic: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.支持父母和孩子度过封锁期(SPARKLE):在 COVID-19 大流行期间,在一项正在进行的一般人群队列研究中实施的数字育儿支持应用程序:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Apr 10;22(1):267. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05226-4.
7
Predicting user adherence to behavioral eHealth interventions in the real world: examining which aspects of intervention design matter most.预测真实世界中用户对行为电子健康干预措施的依从性:研究干预设计的哪些方面最重要。
Transl Behav Med. 2018 Sep 8;8(5):793-798. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibx037.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
Beyond the Trial: Systematic Review of Real-World Uptake and Engagement With Digital Self-Help Interventions for Depression, Low Mood, or Anxiety.试验之外:对抑郁症、情绪低落或焦虑症数字自助干预措施的现实世界采用情况和参与度的系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jun 6;20(6):e199. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9275.
10
Parent Engagement With a Telehealth-Based Parent-Mediated Intervention Program for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders: Predictors of Program Use and Parent Outcomes.父母参与针对自闭症谱系障碍儿童的基于远程医疗的父母介导干预项目:项目使用情况及父母成果的预测因素
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Oct 6;17(10):e227. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4913.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Mechanisms of Action on Adherence and Outcomes in Self-Guided Digital Mental Health Interventions: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial With Mediation Analysis.自我指导的数字心理健康干预中作用机制对依从性和结果的影响:一项带有中介分析的随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 May 21;14:e71238. doi: 10.2196/71238.
2
More than a chatbot: a practical framework to harness artificial intelligence across key components to boost digital therapeutics quality.不止是聊天机器人:一个利用人工智能贯穿关键组件以提升数字疗法质量的实用框架。
Front Digit Health. 2025 Apr 24;7:1541676. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1541676. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Engagement in digital interventions.参与数字干预措施。
Am Psychol. 2022 Oct;77(7):836-852. doi: 10.1037/amp0000983. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
2
Effort-Optimized Intervention Model: Framework for Building and Analyzing Digital Interventions That Require Minimal Effort for Health-Related Gains.优化干预模型:构建和分析需要最小投入即可获得健康收益的数字干预措施的框架。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 12;23(3):e24905. doi: 10.2196/24905.
3
Is there a trial bias impacting user engagement with unguided e-mental health interventions? A systematic comparison of published reports and real-world usage of the same programs.
Examining Differential Effects of Digital Parent Training for Child Behavior Problems on Maternal and Paternal Outcomes.
考察数字式家长培训对儿童行为问题的影响在母亲和父亲方面的差异结果。
Children (Basel). 2025 Apr 6;12(4):469. doi: 10.3390/children12040469.
4
Differences Between Stressed Parents and Their Children: A Brief Analysis on Parent-Child Depression, Stress, Aggression and Possible Roles of Digitalized Parenting Education.压力重重的父母与其子女之间的差异:关于亲子抑郁、压力、攻击性以及数字化育儿教育可能作用的简要分析
J Korean Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 1;36(2):54-61. doi: 10.5765/jkacap.240042.
5
BePresent Universal Internet-Based Parenting Intervention: Single-Arm Pre-Post Intervention Study.“随时在场”基于互联网的通用育儿干预:单臂干预前后研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 13;27:e65391. doi: 10.2196/65391.
6
Identifying Active Ingredients that Cause Change in Digital Parent Training Programs for Child Behavior Problems: A Qualitative Exploration.识别导致儿童行为问题数字家长培训项目产生变化的有效成分:一项定性探索。
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2024 Dec 14. doi: 10.1007/s10578-024-01803-1.
7
Are there unique facets of therapeutic alliance for users of digital mental health interventions? An examination with the eHealth Therapeutic Alliance Inventory.数字心理健康干预使用者的治疗联盟是否有独特的方面?一项使用电子健康治疗联盟量表的调查。
Internet Interv. 2024 Oct 28;38:100783. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2024.100783. eCollection 2024 Dec.
8
Editorial for INVENT special issue of the ISRII 2022 meeting.2022年国际康复创新与实施学会(ISRII)会议INVENT特刊社论。
Internet Interv. 2024 May 11;37:100749. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2024.100749. eCollection 2024 Sep.
9
Digital Interventions for Combating Internet Addiction in Young Children: Qualitative Study of Parent and Therapist Perspectives.用于对抗幼儿网络成瘾的数字干预措施:家长和治疗师观点的定性研究
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2024 Apr 26;7:e55364. doi: 10.2196/55364.
未引导的电子心理健康干预措施的使用中是否存在影响用户参与度的试验偏倚?对相同程序的已发表报告和实际使用情况进行系统比较。
Transl Behav Med. 2019 Nov 25;9(6):1020-1033. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibz147.
4
Objective User Engagement With Mental Health Apps: Systematic Search and Panel-Based Usage Analysis.目标 用户对心理健康应用程序的参与度:系统检索与基于小组的使用情况分析
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Sep 25;21(9):e14567. doi: 10.2196/14567.
5
Experimental Therapeutics for Digital Mental Health.数字心理健康的实验性疗法
JAMA Psychiatry. 2019 Dec 1;76(12):1223-1224. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.2075.
6
Effectiveness and Acceptability of Cognitive Behavior Therapy Delivery Formats in Adults With Depression: A Network Meta-analysis.认知行为疗法在成人抑郁症中的有效性和可接受性:网络荟萃分析。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2019 Jul 1;76(7):700-707. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.0268.
7
Examining Predictors of Real-World User Engagement with Self-Guided eHealth Interventions: Analysis of Mobile Apps and Websites Using a Novel Dataset.考察现实世界中用户对自我引导式电子健康干预措施的参与度预测因素:使用新数据集对移动应用程序和网站进行分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Dec 14;20(12):e11491. doi: 10.2196/11491.
8
Do Parents Benefit From Help When Completing a Self-Guided Parenting Program Online? A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Triple P Online With and Without Telephone Support.家长在完成在线自我指导式育儿计划时是否受益于帮助?一项比较 Triple P Online 有和无电话支持的随机对照试验。
Behav Ther. 2018 Nov;49(6):1020-1038. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
9
Keeping Parents Involved: Predicting Attrition in a Self-Directed, Online Program for Childhood Conduct Problems.让父母参与进来:预测儿童行为问题自我导向在线项目的辍学率。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2019 Nov-Dec;48(6):881-893. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2018.1485109. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
10
Beyond the Trial: Systematic Review of Real-World Uptake and Engagement With Digital Self-Help Interventions for Depression, Low Mood, or Anxiety.试验之外:对抑郁症、情绪低落或焦虑症数字自助干预措施的现实世界采用情况和参与度的系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jun 6;20(6):e199. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9275.