• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

建立单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)成像的诊断参考水平:印度医疗环境中的初步研究。

Establishing Diagnostic Reference Levels for Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Imaging: A Preliminary Study in Indian Healthcare Settings.

作者信息

Pandey Ashutosh, Dhingra Vandana K, Goswami Mayank, Mishra Prabhaker, Sharma Pankaj

机构信息

Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Rishikesh, IND.

Physics, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Roorkee, Roorkee, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Oct 17;16(10):e71740. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71740. eCollection 2024 Oct.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.71740
PMID:39552954
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11568968/
Abstract

Introduction In nuclear medicine, there is a critical need to balance the control and optimization of radiation doses to ensure patient safety while achieving high-quality diagnostic outcomes. However, diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for nuclear medicine imaging studies have not been established in India. This study aims to fill this gap by establishing institutional DRLs and assessing radiation dose data specifically for Nuclear Medicine SPECT examinations. Methods This research was a cross-sectional observational study conducted in a single tertiary care setting, involving 1,250 patients. Data on the administered activity for 18 common single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) procedures were gathered from 2019 to 2021. The 75th percentile (Q3) was established as the baseline for the institutional DRLs. Furthermore, the study conducted comparative analyses with established international DRLs. Results The study proposed institutional DRLs based on 18 SPECT nuclear medicine imaging examinations. The highest Q3 DRLs were identified for 99mTc-sestamibi (1193 MBq), followed by 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate (747 MBq) and 99mTc-ethyl cysteinate dimer (608 MBq). The lowest DRL was recorded for 99mTc gastric emptying imaging (37 MBq). Comparisons with international DRLs indicated close alignment with European Association of Nuclear Medicine Medical Internal Radiation Dose guidelines, while DRLs set by the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) were identified as distinct in several key aspects when compared to other established DRLs. Conclusion This research marks a significant step toward standardizing SPECT procedure doses in India, contributing to improved patient safety and care in nuclear medicine. The established DRLs will enhance the optimization of administered activities, ensure adherence to international standards, and improve diagnostic quality while reducing radiation exposure. These institutional DRLs will serve as the foundation for developing a roadmap to establish national DRLs.

摘要

引言 在核医学中,迫切需要平衡辐射剂量的控制与优化,以确保患者安全,同时实现高质量的诊断结果。然而,印度尚未制定核医学成像研究的诊断参考水平(DRL)。本研究旨在通过建立机构DRL并专门评估核医学单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)检查的辐射剂量数据来填补这一空白。

方法 本研究是在一家三级医疗机构进行的横断面观察性研究,涉及1250名患者。收集了2019年至2021年期间18种常见单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)程序的给药活度数据。将第75百分位数(Q3)确定为机构DRL的基线。此外,该研究还与已确立的国际DRL进行了比较分析。

结果 该研究基于18种SPECT核医学成像检查提出了机构DRL。99mTc-司他米比(1193 MBq)的Q3 DRL最高,其次是99mTc-亚甲基二膦酸盐(747 MBq)和99mTc-半胱氨酸乙酯二聚体(608 MBq)。99mTc胃排空成像的DRL最低(37 MBq)。与国际DRL的比较表明,其与欧洲核医学医学内照射剂量协会的指南密切一致,而与其他已确立的DRL相比,美国国家辐射防护与测量委员会(NCRP)设定的DRL在几个关键方面有所不同。

结论 本研究标志着印度在规范SPECT程序剂量方面迈出了重要一步,有助于提高核医学中的患者安全和护理水平。已确立的DRL将加强给药活度的优化,确保符合国际标准,提高诊断质量,同时减少辐射暴露。这些机构DRL将作为制定国家DRL路线图的基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb22/11568968/6b507f445193/cureus-0016-00000071740-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb22/11568968/fa3ffe156d63/cureus-0016-00000071740-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb22/11568968/9cd3ce2b01b8/cureus-0016-00000071740-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb22/11568968/6b507f445193/cureus-0016-00000071740-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb22/11568968/fa3ffe156d63/cureus-0016-00000071740-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb22/11568968/9cd3ce2b01b8/cureus-0016-00000071740-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb22/11568968/6b507f445193/cureus-0016-00000071740-i03.jpg

相似文献

1
Establishing Diagnostic Reference Levels for Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Imaging: A Preliminary Study in Indian Healthcare Settings.建立单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)成像的诊断参考水平:印度医疗环境中的初步研究。
Cureus. 2024 Oct 17;16(10):e71740. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71740. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
The 2020 national diagnostic reference levels for nuclear medicine in Japan.2020 年日本核医学国家诊断参考水平。
Ann Nucl Med. 2020 Nov;34(11):799-806. doi: 10.1007/s12149-020-01512-4. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
3
Worldwide Diagnostic Reference Levels for Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: Findings From INCAPS.全球单光子发射计算机断层心肌灌注成像诊断参考水平:INCAPS 研究结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Mar;14(3):657-665. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.06.029. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
4
Enhancing Nuclear Medicine Practice in Saudi Arabia: Advocating for Comprehensive Guidelines and Local Diagnostic Reference Levels.加强沙特阿拉伯的核医学实践:倡导制定全面指南和本地诊断参考水平。
Cureus. 2024 Feb 15;16(2):e54230. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54230. eCollection 2024 Feb.
5
National Diagnostic Reference Levels for Nuclear Medicine in Qatar.卡塔尔核医学国家诊断参考水平
J Nucl Med Technol. 2023 Mar;51(1):63-67. doi: 10.2967/jnmt.122.264415. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
6
Evaluation of patients' radiation doses and establishment of institutional diagnostic reference levels in nuclear medicine in Oman.阿曼核医学中患者放射剂量的评估和机构诊断参考水平的建立。
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2024 Sep 10;200(14):1339-1351. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncae170.
7
Diagnostic Reference Levels in PET Imaging at Chulabhorn Hospital, Thailand.泰国朱拉隆功医院正电子发射断层扫描成像的诊断参考水平。
J Nucl Med Technol. 2024 Sep 5;52(3):261-266. doi: 10.2967/jnmt.124.267576.
8
Diagnostic Reference Levels for Adult Nuclear Medicine Imaging Established from the National Survey in Korea.基于韩国全国调查确定的成人核医学成像诊断参考水平。
Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019 Feb;53(1):64-70. doi: 10.1007/s13139-019-00585-y. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
9
A systematic review and meta-analysis on the radiation dose of computed tomography in hybrid nuclear medicine imaging.关于混合核医学成像中计算机断层扫描辐射剂量的系统评价和荟萃分析。
EJNMMI Phys. 2023 May 25;10(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s40658-023-00553-8.
10
Establishing national diagnostic reference levels in radiography, mammography, and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry services in Ireland and comparing these with European diagnostic reference levels.在爱尔兰的放射摄影、乳房 X 光摄影和双能 X 射线吸收测定服务中建立国家诊断参考水平,并将这些与欧洲诊断参考水平进行比较。
Eur Radiol. 2023 Dec;33(12):9469-9478. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09992-4. Epub 2023 Jul 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Diagnostic Reference Levels for Adult Nuclear Medicine Imaging Established from the National Survey in Korea.基于韩国全国调查确定的成人核医学成像诊断参考水平。
Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019 Feb;53(1):64-70. doi: 10.1007/s13139-019-00585-y. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
2
ICRP Publication 135: Diagnostic Reference Levels in Medical Imaging.国际放射防护委员会第135号出版物:医学成像中的诊断参考水平
Ann ICRP. 2017 Oct;46(1):1-144. doi: 10.1177/0146645317717209.
3
A national survey of computed tomography doses in hybrid PET-CT and SPECT-CT examinations in the UK.
英国对混合正电子发射断层扫描-计算机断层扫描(PET-CT)和单光子发射计算机断层扫描-计算机断层扫描(SPECT-CT)检查中计算机断层扫描剂量的全国性调查。
Nucl Med Commun. 2017 Jun;38(6):459-470. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000672.
4
Radiation Safety in Nuclear Medicine Procedures.核医学程序中的辐射安全。
Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Mar;51(1):11-16. doi: 10.1007/s13139-016-0406-0. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
5
Intraoperative radiation safety in orthopaedics: a review of the ALARA (As low as reasonably achievable) principle.骨科手术中的辐射安全:对“尽可能合理达到最低水平”(ALARA)原则的综述。
Patient Saf Surg. 2016 Dec 12;10:27. doi: 10.1186/s13037-016-0115-8. eCollection 2016.
6
Report of a nationwide survey on actual administered radioactivities of radiopharmaceuticals for diagnostic reference levels in Japan.日本放射性药物实际给药活度用于诊断参考水平的全国性调查结果报告。
Ann Nucl Med. 2016 Jul;30(6):435-44. doi: 10.1007/s12149-016-1079-6. Epub 2016 May 6.
7
Estimating the population dose from nuclear medicine examinations towards establishing diagnostic reference levels.估算核医学检查的人群剂量以确定诊断参考水平。
Indian J Nucl Med. 2016 Jan-Mar;31(1):31-5. doi: 10.4103/0972-3919.172353.
8
General Principles of Radiation Protection in Fields of Diagnostic Medical Exposure.诊断性医疗照射领域的辐射防护一般原则。
J Korean Med Sci. 2016 Feb;31 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S6-9. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.S1.S6. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
9
Radiological Justification for and Optimization of Nuclear Medicine Practices in Korea.韩国核医学实践的放射学依据与优化
J Korean Med Sci. 2016 Feb;31 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S59-68. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.S1.S59. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
10
Diagnostic reference level: an important tool for reducing radiation doses in adult and pediatric nuclear medicine procedures in Brazil.诊断参考水平:巴西成人和儿童核医学检查中降低辐射剂量的重要工具。
Nucl Med Commun. 2016 May;37(5):525-33. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000462.