Pranav Muralidharan K, Francis Paul T, Olickal Jeby Jose, Rose Brilly M, Sarma P Sankara, Thankappan Kavumpurathu R
Department of Public Health, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, IND.
Department of Community Medicine, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, IND.
Cureus. 2024 Oct 16;16(10):e71663. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71663. eCollection 2024 Oct.
Background Retirement from an active working environment is one of the important risk factors for mental health problems. The literature on the mental well-being and quality of life among retired public and private sector employees in Kerala is limited. We conducted this study to compare the mental well-being, quality of life and factors associated with them among retired public and private sector employees in Kollam district, Kerala. Methods This community-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 320 retired employees (mean age 69.5 years, Men 172 (53.8%), public sector employees 160 (50%)) selected using multistage cluster sampling. The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) and WHO QoL BREF questionnaire were used for data collection. Multivariate analyses were used to find out the factors associated with mental well-being and quality of life. Results Among the retired private employees, 94 (58.75%) and those from the public sector three (1.88%) reported low mental well-being (Adjusted prevalence ratio (APR) =21.28, 95% CI: 6.34-71.36, p=<0.001). Participants aged > 68 years (APR=1.36, 95% CI: 1.03-1.79, p=0.026) and rural residents (APR= 1.47, 95% CI: 1.09-1.97, p=0.016) reported lower mental well-being compared to their counterparts. Retired public sector employees' quality of life was higher (Adjusted Mean Difference (AMD) =18.67, 95% CI: 15.48-21.86, p=<0.001) compared to retired private sector employees. Participants aged <= 68 years (AMD=7.01, 95% CI: 4.49-9.52, p=<0.001), male gender (AMD=4.25, 95% CI: 1.68-6.81, p=0.001), rural residents (AMD= 2.6, 95% CI: 0.08-5.13, p=0.043) and belonging to above poverty line (AMD=8.12, 95% CI: 4.08-12.16, p=<0.001) had higher QoL scores. Conclusion Efforts are required to improve retirement policies that support the mental health and quality of life of retired private sector employees.
从积极的工作环境中退休是心理健康问题的重要风险因素之一。喀拉拉邦退休的公共和私营部门员工心理健康和生活质量方面的文献有限。我们开展这项研究,以比较喀拉拉邦科拉姆区退休的公共和私营部门员工的心理健康、生活质量及其相关因素。
这项基于社区的横断面研究在320名退休员工中进行(平均年龄69.5岁,男性172人(53.8%),公共部门员工160人(50%)),采用多阶段整群抽样法选取。使用沃里克 - 爱丁堡心理健康量表(WEMWBS)和世界卫生组织生活质量简表(WHO QoL BREF)问卷收集数据。采用多变量分析来找出与心理健康和生活质量相关的因素。
在退休的私营部门员工中,94人(58.75%)报告心理健康水平低,而公共部门退休员工中有3人(1.88%)报告心理健康水平低(调整患病率比(APR)=21.28,95%置信区间:6.34 - 71.36,p<0.001)。年龄>68岁的参与者(APR=1.36,95%置信区间:1.03 - 1.79,p=0.026)和农村居民(APR=1.47,95%置信区间:1.09 - 1.97,p=0.016)报告的心理健康水平低于同龄人。与退休的私营部门员工相比,退休的公共部门员工生活质量更高(调整平均差(AMD)=18.67,95%置信区间:15.48 - 21.86,p<0.001)。年龄<=68岁的参与者(AMD=7.01,95%置信区间:4.49 - 9.52,p<0.001)、男性(AMD=4.25,95%置信区间:1.68 - 6.81,p=0.001)、农村居民(AMD=2.6,95%置信区间:0.08 - 5.13,p=0.043)以及属于贫困线以上(AMD=8.12,95%置信区间:4.08 - 12.16,p<0.001)的人生活质量得分更高。
需要努力改进退休政策,以支持退休私营部门员工的心理健康和生活质量。