Sl Arjun, Ps Manoharan, Eugene Rajkumar, Anandapandian Ponsekar Abraham
Prosthodontics, Thai Moogambigai Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, IND.
Prosthodontics, Indira Gandhi Institute of Dental Sciences, Pondicherry, IND.
Cureus. 2024 Oct 17;16(10):e71718. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71718. eCollection 2024 Oct.
Accurate interocclusal records are crucial for a successful prosthetic treatment as they ensure the correct replication of a patient's jaw movements and relationships. The dimensional stability and compressive resistance of interocclusal record materials are essential factors influencing the quality of the final prosthesis. This study aims to evaluate and compare the dimensional stability and compressive resistance of three commonly used interocclusal recording materials: Ramitec (polyether; 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN), Bona-Bite (polyvinyl siloxane; DMP Dental, Markopoulo, Greece), and O-Bite (polyvinyl siloxane; DMG Dental, Hamburg, Germany).
An in vitro study was conducted using 108 samples prepared from three interocclusal record materials: Ramitec, Bona-Bite, and O-Bite, with each material tested at three different thicknesses (2, 4, and 6mm). A master stainless steel die was used to create the samples. The compressive resistance of each material was measured by applying a static load of 25N using a universal testing machine for one minute. Linear dimensional stability was assessed by comparing the diameters of the samples before and after compression using a vernier caliper.
Bona-Bite exhibited the highest compressive resistance with mean values of 0.315±0.066 (6mm), 0.319±0.065 (4mm), and 0.306±0.065 (2mm). It also showed the least linear dimensional change, with mean values of 0.073±0.040 (6mm), 0.105±0.057 (4mm), and 0.080±0.036 (2mm). In comparison, Ramitec and O-Bite demonstrated lower compressive resistance and higher dimensional changes. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences between Bona-Bite and the other materials in both compressive resistance and dimensional stability.
Bona-Bite (polyvinyl siloxane) outperformed Ramitec (polyether) and O-Bite (polyvinyl siloxane) in terms of compressive resistance and dimensional stability. Therefore, Bona-Bite is recommended for use in interocclusal recording to achieve more accurate and reliable prosthetic outcomes.
准确的咬合记录对于成功的修复治疗至关重要,因为它们能确保正确复制患者的颌骨运动和关系。咬合记录材料的尺寸稳定性和抗压性是影响最终修复体质量的重要因素。本研究旨在评估和比较三种常用咬合记录材料的尺寸稳定性和抗压性:Ramitec(聚醚;3M ESPE,圣保罗,明尼苏达州)、Bona-Bite(聚乙烯基硅氧烷;DMP Dental,希腊马尔科波洛)和O-Bite(聚乙烯基硅氧烷;DMG Dental,德国汉堡)。
进行了一项体外研究,使用从三种咬合记录材料(Ramitec、Bona-Bite和O-Bite)制备的108个样本,每种材料在三种不同厚度(2毫米、4毫米和6毫米)下进行测试。使用一个主不锈钢模具制作样本。使用万能试验机施加25N的静态载荷一分钟来测量每种材料的抗压性。通过使用游标卡尺比较压缩前后样本的直径来评估线性尺寸稳定性。
Bona-Bite表现出最高的抗压性,6毫米厚度时平均值为0.315±0.066,4毫米厚度时为0.319±0.065,2毫米厚度时为0.306±0.065。它还显示出最小的线性尺寸变化,6毫米厚度时平均值为0.073±0.040,4毫米厚度时为0.105±0.057,2毫米厚度时为0.080±0.036。相比之下,Ramitec和O-Bite表现出较低的抗压性和较大的尺寸变化。统计分析显示,Bona-Bite与其他材料在抗压性和尺寸稳定性方面存在显著差异。
在抗压性和尺寸稳定性方面,Bona-Bite(聚乙烯基硅氧烷)优于Ramitec(聚醚)和O-Bite(聚乙烯基硅氧烷)。因此,建议使用Bona-Bite进行咬合记录,以获得更准确可靠的修复效果。