Pathak Akshant Anil, Fouzdar Aakash, Kumar Karan, Agrawal Vivek, Sharma Naveen, Aggarwal Vaibhav
Resident, Department of General Surgery, University College of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India.
Professor, Department of General Surgery, University College of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India.
Maedica (Bucur). 2024 Sep;19(3):573-579. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2024.19.3.573.
This study compares the outcomes of Desarda and Lichtenstein repairs over a period of three years after surgery.
In the present study we included a total number of 624 patients over 18 years of age, out of whom 240 underwent Desarda repair and 384 Lichtenstein repair. Patient data was collected from patient records to compare the two repair groups. Primary outcome measures were the presence of recurrence and chronic inguinal pain after surgery. Secondary outcome measures included operating times, return to activity, short term (<28 days after surgery) complications, long term complications such as infections, abdominal wall stiffness and groin numbness, and patient satisfaction after surgery.
There was no significant difference in recurrence rate between the two repairs. Chronic inguinal pain after Desarda repair showed greater and more significant decrease with time.
It appears that Desarda repair is as efficacious as Lichtenstein repair for hernia surgery, with a better long term pain profile. The short term complication rate is similar for both surgical procedures.
本研究比较了Desarda修补术和Lichtenstein修补术术后三年的效果。
在本研究中,我们纳入了总共624名18岁以上的患者,其中240例行Desarda修补术,384例行Lichtenstein修补术。从患者记录中收集患者数据以比较两个修补组。主要结局指标是术后复发和慢性腹股沟疼痛的情况。次要结局指标包括手术时间、恢复活动情况、短期(术后<28天)并发症、长期并发症如感染、腹壁僵硬和腹股沟麻木,以及术后患者满意度。
两种修补术的复发率无显著差异。Desarda修补术后慢性腹股沟疼痛随时间推移有更大且更显著的减轻。
对于疝气手术,Desarda修补术似乎与Lichtenstein修补术一样有效,且长期疼痛情况更好。两种手术的短期并发症发生率相似。