Martin Caroline P, Youngstrom Eric A, Langfus Joshua A, Findling Robert L, Youngstrom Jennifer K, Van Eck Kathryn, Stepanova Ekaterina, Young Andrea S
Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
JAACAP Open. 2023 Aug 22;1(4):263-273. doi: 10.1016/j.jaacop.2023.08.001. eCollection 2023 Dec.
Impulsive aggression in youth is a significant clinical and public health concern, spanning multiple diagnostic categories and causing significant psychosocial impairment. To advance its assessment and treatment, recent research has focused on developing an empirically derived nosology that can distinguish impulsive aggression from other common childhood problems. The current study is a secondary analysis examining the associations between this empirically defined form of impulsive aggression, other psychiatric symptom dimensions, and behavioral approach and inhibition motivation of youth.
Participants were 636 youth (61% male; 69% Black/African American; mean age = 11.10) who presented for treatment to a community mental health center or an academic medical center. Dimensions of psychopathology were based on a prior principal component analysis that yielded 5 components: aggression-impulsive/reactive (AIR), mania, depression, self-harm, and rule-breaking. All parents and a subset of youth ( = 363) rated behavioral approach and inhibition motivation of youth.
After controlling for demographic factors (age, sex, race) and other dimensions of psychopathology (mania, depression, self-harm, rule-breaking behavior), AIR was uniquely and positively associated with parent- and adolescent-reported behavioral approach motivation and negatively associated with parent-reported behavioral inhibition.
The results help to further characterize AIR, a clinically relevant and empirically defined construct of impulsive aggression, by showing that AIR is associated with high approach and low inhibition motivational dispositions above and beyond the effects of rule-breaking behavior and mood symptoms. These findings add to a growing literature that shows promise in improving assessment and treatment outcomes for this highly impairing clinical concern.
青少年的冲动攻击行为是一个重大的临床和公共卫生问题,跨越多个诊断类别,会导致严重的心理社会功能损害。为了推进对其评估和治疗,最近的研究集中在开发一种基于实证的疾病分类学,以区分冲动攻击行为与其他常见的儿童问题。本研究是一项二次分析,旨在检验这种基于实证定义的冲动攻击行为形式、其他精神症状维度以及青少年的行为趋近和抑制动机之间的关联。
参与者为636名青少年(61%为男性;69%为黑人/非裔美国人;平均年龄 = 11.10岁),他们到社区心理健康中心或学术医疗中心接受治疗。精神病理学维度基于先前的主成分分析,该分析产生了5个成分:攻击-冲动/反应性(AIR)、躁狂、抑郁、自我伤害和违规行为。所有家长和一部分青少年(n = 363)对青少年的行为趋近和抑制动机进行了评分。
在控制了人口统计学因素(年龄、性别、种族)和精神病理学的其他维度(躁狂、抑郁、自我伤害、违规行为)后,AIR与家长和青少年报告的行为趋近动机呈独特的正相关,与家长报告的行为抑制呈负相关。
结果有助于进一步刻画AIR,这是一种与临床相关且基于实证定义的冲动攻击行为结构,表明AIR与高趋近和低抑制动机倾向相关,超出了违规行为和情绪症状的影响。这些发现为越来越多的文献增添了内容,这些文献显示出在改善这一严重损害临床问题的评估和治疗结果方面具有前景。