Poleski M H, Gordon P H
Can J Surg. 1986 Mar;29(2):99-101.
It is common clinical practice to test stools for occult blood and to rely heavily upon the result in deciding whether to investigate further. Because the accuracy of such testing has been questioned, a study was conducted to estimate the sensitivity of the Hemoccult II slide test in detecting colonic carcinoma and polyps. Patients with lesions demonstrated on barium enema roentgenography had their stools examined for occult blood. One to 2 weeks before colonoscopy, stool specimens were collected for 3 consecutive days according to the manufacturer's instructions. The sensitivity of occult blood testing was 38% for patients with benign polyps and 64% for patients with polypoid carcinomas. Thus, the authors conclude that the Hemoccult II test is not reliable as a diagnostic tool and that a negative test result does not exclude the presence of a colonic neoplasm in any patient.
检测粪便潜血并在很大程度上依据检测结果来决定是否进一步检查是常见的临床做法。由于此类检测的准确性受到质疑,因此开展了一项研究以评估隐血便潜血Ⅱ型玻片试验检测结肠癌和息肉的敏感性。在钡灌肠X线造影中显示有病变的患者接受了粪便潜血检查。在结肠镜检查前1至2周,按照制造商的说明连续3天收集粪便标本。对于患有良性息肉的患者,潜血检测的敏感性为38%,对于患有息肉样癌的患者为64%。因此,作者得出结论,隐血便潜血Ⅱ型试验作为一种诊断工具并不可靠,阴性检测结果不能排除任何患者存在结肠肿瘤。