Guo Zibin, Xing Zehui, Liu Linyan, Schwieter John W, Liu Huanhuan
Research Center of Brain and Cognitive Neuroscience, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, 116029 China.
Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Neuroscience, Dalian, 116029 Liaoning Province China.
Cogn Neurodyn. 2024 Oct;18(5):2161-2176. doi: 10.1007/s11571-024-10072-6. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
Expectation States Theory suggests that social status carries emotions, with higher statuses producing positive emotions and lower statuses leading to negative emotions. However, the theory is broad and lacks empirical evidence. This study investigated whether positive and negative evaluations from positions of higher and lower social hierarchies affect decisions. We examined whether decision making is influenced when evaluations were given in a first (L1) versus second language (L2). Bilinguals read scenarios in which they imagined themselves in the middle of the hierarchy. They then made a series of decisions, each of which was preceded with an evaluative word from other individuals whose hierarchical positions were higher or lower. The behavioral results showed that negative evaluations from higher positions exerted greater impact on decisions than when negative evaluations came from a lower position. At the neural level, after receiving negative evaluations, a higher hierarchy elicited greater activation in the right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), left supplementary motor area (SMA), right precentral gyrus, left fusiform gyrus, bilateral inferior occipital gyrus (IOG), and right AI compared to a lower hierarchy, which may be caused by the view that a negative evaluation from a higher hierarchy is criticism. Conversely, after receiving positive evaluations, the lower hierarchy elicited greater activation in the right IFG, left SMA, right precentral gyrus, bilateral IOG, right AI and right IPS compared to the higher hierarchy, which may be due to the fact that positive evaluations from positions of lower hierarchies are perceived as encouraging. Together, these findings support Expectation States Theory in that regardless of whether evaluative advice is given in an L1 or L2, there is an internal association between social status and social-emotional neural responses that are localized in the frontal-parietal and visual cortices.
期望状态理论表明,社会地位承载着情感,较高的地位产生积极情绪,较低的地位导致消极情绪。然而,该理论较为宽泛且缺乏实证依据。本研究调查了来自社会等级制度中较高和较低地位的积极和消极评价是否会影响决策。我们考察了在第一语言(L1)与第二语言(L2)中给出评价时决策是否会受到影响。双语者阅读一些情景,在其中他们想象自己处于等级制度的中间位置。然后他们做出一系列决策,每个决策之前都有来自等级地位较高或较低的其他人的一个评价性词语。行为结果表明,来自较高地位的消极评价对决策的影响比来自较低地位的消极评价更大。在神经层面,与较低等级相比,在收到消极评价后,较高等级在右侧额下回(IFG)、左侧辅助运动区(SMA)、右侧中央前回、左侧梭状回、双侧枕下回(IOG)和右侧前岛叶(AI)引发了更大的激活,这可能是由于认为来自较高等级的消极评价是批评的观点。相反,在收到积极评价后,与较高等级相比,较低等级在右侧额下回、左侧辅助运动区、右侧中央前回、双侧枕下回、右侧前岛叶和右侧顶内沟引发了更大的激活,这可能是因为来自较低等级地位的积极评价被视为鼓励。总之,这些发现支持了期望状态理论,即无论评价性建议是用第一语言还是第二语言给出,社会地位与位于额顶叶和视觉皮层的社会情感神经反应之间都存在内在关联。