Suppr超能文献

秋水仙碱与急性心肌梗死

Colchicine in Acute Myocardial Infarction.

作者信息

Jolly Sanjit S, d'Entremont Marc-André, Lee Shun Fu, Mian Rajibul, Tyrwhitt Jessica, Kedev Sasko, Montalescot Gilles, Cornel Jan H, Stanković Goran, Moreno Raul, Storey Robert F, Henry Timothy D, Mehta Shamir R, Bossard Matthias, Kala Petr, Layland Jamie, Zafirovska Biljana, Devereaux P J, Eikelboom John, Cairns John A, Shah Binita, Sheth Tej, Sharma Sanjib K, Tarhuni Wadea, Conen David, Tawadros Sarah, Lavi Shahar, Yusuf Salim

机构信息

Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2025 Feb 13;392(7):633-642. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2405922. Epub 2024 Nov 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Inflammation is associated with adverse cardiovascular events. Data from recent trials suggest that colchicine reduces the risk of cardiovascular events.

METHODS

In this multicenter trial with a 2-by-2 factorial design, we randomly assigned patients who had myocardial infarction to receive either colchicine or placebo and either spironolactone or placebo. The results of the colchicine trial are reported here. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke, or unplanned ischemia-driven coronary revascularization, evaluated in a time-to-event analysis. C-reactive protein was measured at 3 months in a subgroup of patients, and safety was also assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 7062 patients at 104 centers in 14 countries underwent randomization; at the time of analysis, the vital status was unknown for 45 patients (0.6%), and this information was most likely missing at random. A primary-outcome event occurred in 322 of 3528 patients (9.1%) in the colchicine group and 327 of 3534 patients (9.3%) in the placebo group over a median follow-up period of 3 years (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85 to 1.16; P = 0.93). The incidence of individual components of the primary outcome appeared to be similar in the two groups. The least-squares mean difference in C-reactive protein levels between the colchicine group and the placebo group at 3 months, adjusted according to the baseline values, was -1.28 mg per liter (95% CI, -1.81 to -0.75). Diarrhea occurred in a higher percentage of patients with colchicine than with placebo (10.2% vs. 6.6%; P<0.001), but the incidence of serious infections did not differ between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients who had myocardial infarction, treatment with colchicine, when started soon after myocardial infarction and continued for a median of 3 years, did not reduce the incidence of the composite primary outcome (death from cardiovascular causes, recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke, or unplanned ischemia-driven coronary revascularization). (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others; CLEAR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03048825.).

摘要

背景

炎症与不良心血管事件相关。近期试验数据表明,秋水仙碱可降低心血管事件风险。

方法

在这项采用2×2析因设计的多中心试验中,我们将心肌梗死患者随机分配,分别接受秋水仙碱或安慰剂,以及螺内酯或安慰剂。本文报告秋水仙碱试验的结果。主要疗效结局为心血管原因死亡、复发性心肌梗死、中风或非计划的缺血驱动冠状动脉血运重建的复合结局,采用事件发生时间分析进行评估。在一组亚组患者中于3个月时测量C反应蛋白,并评估安全性。

结果

14个国家104个中心的7062例患者进行了随机分组;在分析时,45例患者(0.6%)的生命状态未知,且该信息很可能是随机缺失的。在中位随访期3年期间,秋水仙碱组3528例患者中有322例(9.1%)发生主要结局事件,安慰剂组3534例患者中有327例(9.3%)发生主要结局事件(风险比,0.99;95%置信区间[CI],0.85至1.16;P = 0.93)。两组主要结局各单项组成部分的发生率似乎相似。根据基线值调整后,秋水仙碱组与安慰剂组在3个月时C反应蛋白水平的最小二乘均值差异为每升 -1.28 mg(95%CI,-1.81至 -0.75)。服用秋水仙碱的患者腹泻发生率高于服用安慰剂的患者(10.2%对6.6%;P<0.001),但两组严重感染的发生率无差异。

结论

在心肌梗死患者中,心肌梗死后不久开始服用秋水仙碱并持续中位时间3年,并未降低复合主要结局(心血管原因死亡、复发性心肌梗死、中风或非计划的缺血驱动冠状动脉血运重建)的发生率。(由加拿大卫生研究院等资助;CLEAR临床试验注册号,NCT03048825。)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验