Suppr超能文献

以社区为基础的即时检测设备诊断儿童贫血的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care devices for detection of anemia in children in community settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Pediatric Neurology Division, Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, 249203, India.

Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India.

出版信息

Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Nov 18;184(1):23. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05875-y.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

A number of clinical studies have been conducted comparing the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive and invasive point-of-care diagnostic tests for anemia, using reference standards such as hematology autoanalyzers.

METHODS

This meta-analysis was performed to determine the pooled estimate for the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care devices for the detection of anemia in community settings in children aged up to 14 years and determining whether the diagnostic accuracy of various point-of-care devices differs significantly. We included only original clinical studies with a sample size of 25 or more in the review. The QUADAS-2 tool was employed to evaluate the risk of bias and concerns regarding the applicability of the included studies.

RESULTS

A total of 16 studies (HemoCue in 11; WHO Hemoglobin Color Scale in 3; Masimo, AnemoCheck-LRS, and Sahli's hemoglobinometer in 1 study each) were included. The pooled estimates for the sensitivity and specificity of point-of-care tests were 79.5% (95% CI: 65.6-88.7%) and 90.1% (95% CI: 82.5-94.6%), respectively. The difference in the level of hemoglobin measured was also insignificant between point-of-care and reference standards (MD: 0.2 [95% CI: - 0.2 to 0.6], p = 0.33), as well as for HemoCue and WHO Hemoglobin Color Scale subgroups (p = 0.73 and 0.05, respectively). The sensitivity and specificity of HemoCue and WHO Hemoglobin Color Scale were 79% (95% CI: 78-80%)/93% (95% CI: 92-94%) and 89% (95% CI: 86-91%)/88% (95% CI: 74-95%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Point-of-care diagnostic tests for anemia have acceptable sensitivity and specificity for screening anemia in children. There was no significant difference between the performance of HemoCue and the WHO Hemoglobin Color Scale. Prospero registration number: CRD42023386952 What is known? • Anemia is a major health prob lem in children in many countries across the world. • Screening for anemia in the community is important for timely therapeutic intervention. • Point-of-care testing (POCT) devices for anemia in children allow for quick Hb assessments at the site of care, providing immediate results. • Both non-invasive and micro-invasive POCT devices for anemia are currently available. What is new? • Point-of-care diagnostic tests for anemia have acceptable sensitivity and specificity for screening anemia in children. • There is no significant difference between the performance of HemoCue and the WHO Hemoglobin Color Scale.

摘要

简介

已经开展了许多临床研究,比较了非侵入性和侵入性即时诊断检测在使用血液学自动分析仪等参考标准的情况下对贫血的诊断准确性。

方法

本荟萃分析旨在确定即时诊断检测在社区环境中用于检测年龄在 14 岁以下儿童贫血的综合估计值,并确定各种即时诊断检测设备的诊断准确性是否存在显著差异。我们仅将审查中样本量为 25 个或更多的原始临床研究纳入。使用 QUADAS-2 工具评估偏倚风险和纳入研究的适用性问题。

结果

共纳入 16 项研究(HemoCue 为 11 项,WHO 血红蛋白色标为 3 项,Masimo、AnemoCheck-LRS 和 Sahli 血红蛋白计各 1 项)。即时诊断检测的敏感性和特异性的综合估计值分别为 79.5%(95%CI:65.6-88.7%)和 90.1%(95%CI:82.5-94.6%)。即时诊断检测和参考标准之间的血红蛋白测量值水平差异也无统计学意义(MD:0.2 [95%CI:-0.2 至 0.6],p=0.33),HemoCue 和 WHO 血红蛋白色标亚组之间也无统计学意义(p=0.73 和 0.05)。HemoCue 和 WHO 血红蛋白色标检测的敏感性和特异性分别为 79%(95%CI:78-80%)/93%(95%CI:92-94%)和 89%(95%CI:86-91%)/88%(95%CI:74-95%)。

结论

即时诊断检测贫血具有可接受的敏感性和特异性,可用于筛查儿童贫血。HemoCue 和 WHO 血红蛋白色标之间的性能无显著差异。

前瞻性注册号

CRD42023386952

已知内容

  • 贫血是世界上许多国家儿童的主要健康问题。

  • 社区筛查贫血对于及时进行治疗干预很重要。

  • 即时检测(POCT)设备可用于儿童贫血的快速 Hb 评估,在护理点提供即时结果。

  • 目前有非侵入性和微侵入性 POCT 设备可用于贫血。

新内容

  • 即时诊断检测贫血具有可接受的敏感性和特异性,可用于筛查儿童贫血。

  • HemoCue 和 WHO 血红蛋白色标之间的性能无显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验