Olatunya Oladele, Ogundare Olatunde, Olaleye Abiola, Agaja Oyinkansola, Omoniyi Evelyn, Adeyefa Babajide, Oluwadiya Kehinde, Oyelami Oyeku
Department of Paediatrics, Ekiti State University/ Teaching Hospital, Ekiti State, Nigeria.
Achieving Health Nigeria Initiative, Abuja, Nigeria.
Ethiop J Health Sci. 2016 May;26(3):251-8. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v26i3.8.
Prompt and accurate diagnosis is needed to prevent the untoward effects of anaemia on children. Although haematology analyzers are the gold standard for accurate measurement of haemoglobin or haematocrit for anaemia diagnosis, they are often out of the reach of most health facilities in resource-poor settings thus creating a care gap. We conducted this study to examine the agreement between a point-of-care device and haematology analyzer in determining the haematocrit levels in children and to determine its usefulness in diagnosing anaemia in resource-poor settings.
EDTA blood samples collected from participants were processed to estimate their haematocrits using the two devices (Mindray BC-3600 haematology analyzer and Portable Mission Hb/Haemotocrit testing system). A pairwise t-test was used to compare the haematocrit (PCV) results from the automated haematology analyzer and the portable haematocrit meter. The agreement between the two sets of measurements was assessed using the Bland and Altman method where the mean, standard deviation and limit of agreement of paired results were calculated.
The intraclass and concordance correlation coefficients were 0.966 and 0.936. Sensitivity and specificity were 97.85% and 94.51% respectively while the positive predictive and negative predictive values were 94.79% and 97.73%. The Bland and Altman`s limit of agreement was -5.5-5.1 with the mean difference being -0.20 and a non-ignificant variability between the two measurements (p = 0.506).
Haematocrit determined by the portable testing system is comparable to that determined by the haematology analyzer. We therefore recommend its use as a point-of-care device for determining haematocrit in resource-poor settings where haematology analyzers are not available.
为预防贫血对儿童产生不良影响,需要及时准确的诊断。尽管血液学分析仪是准确测量血红蛋白或血细胞比容以诊断贫血的金标准,但在资源匮乏地区,大多数医疗机构往往无法配备,从而造成了医疗差距。我们开展这项研究,旨在检验一种即时检测设备与血液学分析仪在测定儿童血细胞比容水平方面的一致性,并确定其在资源匮乏地区诊断贫血的效用。
收集参与者的乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)血样,使用两种设备(迈瑞BC-3600血液学分析仪和便携式Mission血红蛋白/血细胞比容检测系统)对其进行处理,以估算血细胞比容。采用配对t检验比较自动血液学分析仪和便携式血细胞比容仪的血细胞比容(PCV)结果。使用布兰德-奥特曼方法评估两组测量结果之间的一致性,计算配对结果的均值、标准差和一致性界限。
组内相关系数和一致性相关系数分别为0.966和0.936。灵敏度和特异度分别为97.85%和94.51%,阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为94.79%和97.73%。布兰德-奥特曼一致性界限为-5.5至5.1,平均差值为-0.20,两次测量之间的变异性无统计学意义(p = 0.506)。
便携式检测系统测定的血细胞比容与血液学分析仪测定的结果相当。因此,我们建议在没有血液学分析仪的资源匮乏地区,将其用作即时检测设备来测定血细胞比容。