• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人与腹腔镜治疗小儿卵巢良性肿瘤的比较。

Comparison of robotic vs. laparoscopic treatment in pediatric ovarian benign tumors.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, The Children's Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 3333 Binsheng Rd, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Department of Surgical Oncology, The Children's Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 3333 Binsheng Rd, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Nov 18;409(1):351. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03543-1.

DOI:10.1007/s00423-024-03543-1
PMID:39556231
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the differences in surgical outcomes of robot-assisted treatment and laparoscopy for benign ovarian tumors among pediatric patients.

METHODS

A total of 39 patients underwent robot-assisted surgery, and their outcomes were compared with 55 patients treated with laparoscopy during the same period by the same surgeons.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of age (7.5 ± 4.5 vs. 8.8 ± 3.8 years, p = 0.2496), weight (29.3 ± 17.7 vs. 31.7 ± 14.6 kg, p = 0.4383), or tumor size (5.0 ± 3.3 vs. 5.1 ± 3.8 cm, p = 0.8541). However, the operative time was significantly longer in the robotic surgery group (102.7 ± 33.5 vs. 89.3 ± 50.9 min, p = 0.0112). There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss. Fewer patients in the robotic surgery group opted for day surgery compared to the laparoscopy group (15.4% vs. 54.5%, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the length of hospital stay between the two groups of patients who chose inpatient surgery (5.6 ± 3.4 vs. 4.4 ± 2.9 d, p = 0.1213). There was no conversion to open surgery and no early postoperative complications in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Robot-assisted surgery and laparoscopy yield comparable outcomes for the treatment of benign ovarian tumors in children, although robotic surgery has a longer operative time.

摘要

目的

比较机器人辅助治疗和腹腔镜治疗小儿良性卵巢肿瘤的手术效果差异。

方法

共有 39 名患者接受了机器人手术,将他们的结果与同期由同一位外科医生进行腹腔镜治疗的 55 名患者进行比较。

结果

两组患者在年龄(7.5±4.5 岁与 8.8±3.8 岁,p=0.2496)、体重(29.3±17.7 千克与 31.7±14.6 千克,p=0.4383)或肿瘤大小(5.0±3.3 厘米与 5.1±3.8 厘米,p=0.8541)方面均无显著差异。然而,机器人手术组的手术时间明显更长(102.7±33.5 分钟与 89.3±50.9 分钟,p=0.0112)。术中出血量无显著差异。与腹腔镜组相比,机器人手术组选择日间手术的患者较少(15.4%比 54.5%,p<0.001)。选择住院手术的两组患者的住院时间无显著差异(5.6±3.4 天与 4.4±2.9 天,p=0.1213)。两组均无中转开腹,且无早期术后并发症。

结论

机器人辅助手术和腹腔镜治疗小儿良性卵巢肿瘤的效果相当,尽管机器人手术的手术时间较长。

相似文献

1
Comparison of robotic vs. laparoscopic treatment in pediatric ovarian benign tumors.机器人与腹腔镜治疗小儿卵巢良性肿瘤的比较。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Nov 18;409(1):351. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03543-1.
2
Comparison of robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopy in the management of adnexal masses.机器人辅助腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜在附件肿物处理中的比较。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Nov-Dec;21(6):1071-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.05.007. Epub 2014 May 24.
3
Feasibility and surgical outcomes of conventional and robot-assisted laparoscopy for early-stage ovarian cancer: a retrospective, multicenter analysis.传统腹腔镜与机器人辅助腹腔镜用于早期卵巢癌的可行性及手术效果:一项回顾性多中心分析
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016 Sep;294(3):615-22. doi: 10.1007/s00404-016-4087-9. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
4
Comparison of pediatric choledochal cyst excisions with open procedures, laparoscopic procedures and robot-assisted procedures: a retrospective study.小儿胆总管囊肿切除手术的比较:开放手术、腹腔镜手术和机器人辅助手术的回顾性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jul;34(7):3223-3231. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07560-1. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
5
Robotic-assisted vs. Laparoscopic Heller's Myotomy for Achalasia in Children.机器人辅助与腹腔镜下 Heller 肌切开术治疗儿童贲门失弛缓症。
J Pediatr Surg. 2024 Jun;59(6):1072-1076. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2023.11.003. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
6
[Effects of robotic and laparoscopic-assisted surgery on lymph node dissection and short-term outcomes in patients with Siewert II adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction].[机器人手术与腹腔镜辅助手术对食管胃交界部Siewert II型腺癌患者淋巴结清扫及短期预后的影响]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Feb 25;22(2):156-163.
7
[Efficacy comparison of robotic and laparoscopic radical surgery in the treatment of middle-low rectal cancer].机器人手术与腹腔镜根治性手术治疗中低位直肠癌的疗效比较
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 May 25;20(5):540-544.
8
[Grading evaluation of operative complications and analysis of related risk factors in patients with stage Ⅰ endometrial cancer treated by robotic-assisted and traditional laparoscopic surgery].[机器人辅助手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗Ⅰ期子宫内膜癌患者手术并发症的分级评估及相关危险因素分析]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Feb 25;55(2):112-119. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2020.02.010.
9
[Application of robotic and laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy to gastric cancer patients with body mass index ≥24 kg/m].机器人辅助及腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术在体重指数≥24kg/m²的胃癌患者中的应用
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Mar 25;21(3):318-324.
10
Robot-assisted resection of renal tumor in children and comparison with laparoscopic surgery.机器人辅助儿童肾肿瘤切除术与腹腔镜手术的比较。
BMC Surg. 2024 Oct 22;24(1):325. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02625-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term outcomes of microsurgery and stereotactic radiosurgery as the first-line treatment for arteriovenous malformations: a propensity score-matched analysis using nationwide multicenter prospective registry data.作为一线治疗方案的显微手术和立体定向放射外科治疗动静脉畸形的长期疗效:基于全国多中心前瞻性注册登记数据的倾向评分匹配分析。
Int J Surg. 2023 Dec 1;109(12):3983-3992. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000751.
2
Pediatric Robotic Surgery.小儿机器人外科学。
Surg Clin North Am. 2020 Apr;100(2):431-443. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2019.12.004. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
3
Robotic-assisted resection of ovarian tumors in children: A case report and review of literature.
儿童卵巢肿瘤的机器人辅助切除术:一例报告及文献综述
World J Clin Cases. 2019 Sep 6;7(17):2542-2548. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i17.2542.
4
Evaluation of a new robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgical system for procedures in small cavities.新型机器人辅助腹腔镜手术系统在小腔镜手术中的评估。
J Robot Surg. 2020 Feb;14(1):191-197. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-00961-y. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
5
Robotic-assisted surgery in children: advantages and limitations.儿童机器人辅助手术:优势与局限
J Robot Surg. 2010 May;4(1):19-22. doi: 10.1007/s11701-010-0181-3. Epub 2010 Apr 10.
6
Robot-assisted surgery in children: current status.儿童机器人辅助手术:现状
J Robot Surg. 2008;1(4):243-6. doi: 10.1007/s11701-007-0054-6. Epub 2008 Jan 4.
7
A comparison of robotic surgery in children weighing above and below 15.0 kg: size does not affect surgery success.体重超过和低于15.0千克儿童的机器人手术比较:体重大小不影响手术成功率。
Surg Endosc. 2015 Sep;29(9):2643-50. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3982-z. Epub 2014 Dec 6.
8
The first decade of robotic surgery in children.机器人手术在儿童中的首个十年。
J Pediatr Surg. 2013 Apr;48(4):858-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.01.031.
9
Robotic assisted surgery in pediatric gynecology: promising innovation in mini invasive surgical procedures.小儿妇科中的机器人辅助手术:微创外科手术中有前景的创新。
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2013 Feb;26(1):e5-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2012.09.009. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
10
A comparative direct cost analysis of pediatric urologic robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery: could robot-assisted surgery be less expensive?小儿泌尿外科机器人辅助腹腔镜手术与开放手术的直接成本比较分析:机器人辅助手术是否更便宜?
J Endourol. 2012 Jul;26(7):871-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0584. Epub 2012 Mar 14.