• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

世界卫生组织欧洲区域的电子健康记录与数据交换:次区域成就、挑战及前景分析

Electronic health records and data exchange in the WHO European region: A subregional analysis of achievements, challenges, and prospects.

作者信息

Tornero Costa Roberto, Adib Keyrellous, Salama Nagui, Davia Stefania, Martínez Millana Antonio, Traver Vicente, Davtyan Karapet

机构信息

Instituto Universitario de Investigación de Aplicaciones de las Tecnologías de la Información y de las Comunicaciones Avanzadas, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain.

World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Int J Med Inform. 2025 Feb;194:105687. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105687. Epub 2024 Nov 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105687
PMID:39556969
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11635092/
Abstract

Electronic health record (EHR) systems are powerful tools that enhance healthcare quality. They improve efficiency, enable data exchange, and ensure authorized access to patient information. In 2022, the World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe (WHO EURO) conducted a survey to assess the digital health capabilities of the 53 Member States. This article provides a sub-regional analysis of the status of EHR systems and major barriers to their implementation, their readiness for information sharing, and the access and re-use of EHR data. Generally, EHR implementation and national data exchange are at an advanced stage in the region, though achievements and challenges vary across subregions. While more Member States in the Eastern, Western, and Southern Europe subregions reported having centralized national EHR systems, the situation is more diverse in Northern Europe and the Asian subregions, where both centralized and decentralized EHR systems are in use. Significant barriers to EHR implementation, including funding, technical capacity, competing priorities, and lack of interoperability standards are frequently cited, while others like demand, knowledge or acceptance challenges are not reported as significant. Significant barriers were reported the most by the Central Asia subregion, while barriers had least significance in Western Europe. Five out of the six subregions reported a wide adoption of national strategies and have dedicated agencies to ensure interoperability and secure data exchange. However, only 29 Member States have established legal requirements for healthcare providers to adopt EHR systems that conform to national standards for both clinical terminology and electronic messaging, with this being most notable in Western, Eastern, and Northern Europe, and the lowest percentage of Member States in Central Asia. All Member States of the six sub regions have passed privacy and data protection legislation. The use of EHR data is widely regulated, with only five remaining Member States of WHO Europe to develop EHR legislation distributed across subregions (Southern Europe, Western and Central Asia). Looking ahead, Member States are encouraged to define national legislation governing EHR systems and their use, while ensuring the interconnectivity of the local and regional EHR systems. Sustainable funding should be allocated to the development and maintenance of these systems. Efforts should also focus on creating comprehensive roadmaps for the full implementation of health data standards, addressing interoperability at local and regional levels, and developing quality management systems for testing and certification. Additionally, monitoring and evaluation should be conducted to assess whether EHRs are contributing to national health objectives. Finally, engaging patients and intersectoral partners will be key to developing a more patient-centered approach, ensuring that EHR systems meet patient needs and expectations.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5be5/11635092/bea22d9f5b8d/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5be5/11635092/09fa4d83c86e/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5be5/11635092/ddcece48b3d3/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5be5/11635092/bea22d9f5b8d/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5be5/11635092/09fa4d83c86e/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5be5/11635092/ddcece48b3d3/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5be5/11635092/bea22d9f5b8d/gr3.jpg
摘要

电子健康记录(EHR)系统是提升医疗质量的强大工具。它们提高了效率,实现了数据交换,并确保对患者信息的授权访问。2022年,世界卫生组织欧洲区域办事处(世卫组织欧洲办事处)进行了一项调查,以评估53个成员国的数字健康能力。本文对EHR系统的现状、实施的主要障碍、信息共享的准备情况以及EHR数据的访问和再利用进行了次区域分析。总体而言,该区域的EHR实施和国家数据交换处于 advanced stage,尽管各次区域的成就和挑战各不相同。东欧、西欧和南欧次区域有更多成员国报告称拥有集中式国家EHR系统,而北欧和亚洲次区域的情况则更为多样,集中式和分散式EHR系统都在使用。EHR实施存在重大障碍,包括资金、技术能力、相互竞争的优先事项以及缺乏互操作性标准等经常被提及,而需求、知识或接受度等挑战则未被报告为重大问题。中亚次区域报告的重大障碍最多,而西欧的障碍最小。六个次区域中有五个报告广泛采用了国家战略,并设有专门机构来确保互操作性和安全的数据交换。然而,只有29个成员国对医疗保健提供者采用符合临床术语和电子通信国家标准的EHR系统制定了法律要求,这在西欧、东欧和北欧最为明显,中亚成员国的比例最低。六个次区域的所有成员国都通过了隐私和数据保护立法。EHR数据的使用受到广泛监管,世卫组织欧洲办事处仅有五个成员国尚未制定EHR立法,分布在次区域(南欧、西亚和中亚)。展望未来,鼓励成员国制定管理EHR系统及其使用的国家立法,同时确保本地和区域EHR系统的互联互通。应为这些系统的开发和维护分配可持续资金。工作还应侧重于制定全面的路线图,以全面实施健康数据标准,解决本地和区域层面的互操作性问题,并开发用于测试和认证的质量管理系统。此外,应进行监测和评估,以评估EHR是否有助于实现国家卫生目标。最后,让患者和跨部门合作伙伴参与进来将是制定更以患者为中心的方法的关键,确保EHR系统满足患者的需求和期望。

相似文献

1
Electronic health records and data exchange in the WHO European region: A subregional analysis of achievements, challenges, and prospects.世界卫生组织欧洲区域的电子健康记录与数据交换:次区域成就、挑战及前景分析
Int J Med Inform. 2025 Feb;194:105687. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105687. Epub 2024 Nov 10.
2
Patient and caregiver perceptions of electronic health records interoperability in the NHS and its impact on care quality: a focus group study.患者及护理人员对英国国民医疗服务体系中电子健康记录互操作性的看法及其对护理质量的影响:一项焦点小组研究
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Dec 3;24(1):370. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02789-5.
3
Policy brief on the current status of certification of electronic Health Records in the US and Europe.关于美国和欧洲电子健康记录认证现状的政策简报。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;170:83-106.
4
Perceptions of chief clinical information officers on the state of electronic health records systems interoperability in NHS England: a qualitative interview study.英国国家医疗服务体系中首席临床信息官对电子健康记录系统互操作性现状的看法:一项定性访谈研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Aug 12;23(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02255-8.
5
The Evolution of Health Information Technology for Enhanced Patient-Centric Care in the United States: Data-Driven Descriptive Study.美国医疗信息技术的演进:以数据为驱动的描述性研究,以增强以患者为中心的护理。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 28;26:e59791. doi: 10.2196/59791.
6
A Unified Approach to Health Data Exchange: A Report From the US DHHS.一种统一的健康数据交换方法:来自美国卫生与公众服务部的报告。
JAMA. 2025 Mar 25;333(12):1074-1079. doi: 10.1001/jama.2025.0068.
7
Lessons Learned From European Health Data Projects With Cancer Use Cases: Implementation of Health Standards and Internet of Things Semantic Interoperability.从欧洲癌症用例健康数据项目中吸取的经验教训:健康标准的实施与物联网语义互操作性
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 24;27:e66273. doi: 10.2196/66273.
8
Interoperability Framework of the European Health Data Space for the Secondary Use of Data: Interactive European Interoperability Framework-Based Standards Compliance Toolkit for AI-Driven Projects.用于数据二次利用的欧洲健康数据空间互操作性框架:基于交互式欧洲互操作性框架的人工智能驱动项目标准合规工具包。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 23;27:e69813. doi: 10.2196/69813.
9
ACTION-EHR: Patient-Centric Blockchain-Based Electronic Health Record Data Management for Cancer Care.ACTION-EHR:基于区块链的以患者为中心的电子健康记录数据管理系统在癌症护理中的应用。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 21;22(8):e13598. doi: 10.2196/13598.
10
Interoperability Progress and Remaining Data Quality Barriers of Certified Health Information Technologies.认证健康信息技术的互操作性进展及剩余的数据质量障碍
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018 Dec 5;2018:358-367. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
A randomized study comparing patient portal and email communications for trial recruitment.一项比较患者门户网站和电子邮件沟通用于试验招募的随机研究。
Clin Trials. 2025 Aug 21:17407745251358259. doi: 10.1177/17407745251358259.

本文引用的文献

1
Technological progress in electronic health record system optimization: Systematic review of systematic literature reviews.电子健康记录系统优化中的技术进步:系统文献综述的系统评价
Int J Med Inform. 2021 Aug;152:104507. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104507. Epub 2021 May 21.
2
The Digitization of Patient Care: A Review of the Effects of Electronic Health Records on Health Care Quality and Utilization.患者护理的数字化:电子健康记录对医疗质量和利用的影响综述。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2019 Apr 1;40:487-500. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040218-044206. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
3
Implementation of a nationwide electronic health record (EHR).
全国电子健康记录(EHR)的实施。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2018 Mar 12;31(2):116-130. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-09-2016-0136.
4
Electronic health records: privacy, confidentiality, and security.电子健康记录:隐私、保密与安全。
Virtual Mentor. 2012 Sep 1;14(9):712-9. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2012.14.9.stas1-1209.
5
[Shared electronic health record in Catalonia, Spain].[西班牙加泰罗尼亚的共享电子健康记录]
Med Clin (Barc). 2010 Feb;134 Suppl 1:45-8. doi: 10.1016/S0025-7753(10)70009-9.