De La Chica Anabella, Birkett Jason, Akwei Cynthia, Lamont David, Dawnay Nick
School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Byrom Street, Liverpool L3 3AF, UK.
School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Byrom Street, Liverpool L3 3AF, UK; Forensic Research Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, Byrom Street, Liverpool, UK.
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2025 Jan;74:103171. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2024.103171. Epub 2024 Nov 8.
Forensic services worldwide often encounter considerable challenges relating to funding and infrastructure. Smaller jurisdictions or areas where forensic resources are scarce are faced with complicated choices in how they approach criminal casework, with a number of options available. Often these involve trade-offs between cost, time and data quality. Faced with such decisions it becomes important for the field to acknowledge the realities facing such jurisdictions, discuss the pros and cons of each approach, and identify a framework for making such decisions. This novel paper, reviews the available literature and identifies three main solutions for consideration: 1) the use of satellite laboratories for sample triage, 2) the use of a main regional laboratory for full forensic analysis and 3) the use of rapid DNA by police for reducing backlogs. Alongside these strategies, the impacts of cost and quality in regard to each of the stated options are considered. While the literature supports the assertion that some methods can reduce downstream costs via the reduction in turnaround times, there is limited data highlighting the business case used to support decision making when considering these options including the use of cost:benefit analyses or case studies, emphasizing the novelty of this paper. This is likely due to the commercialized nature of the forensic sector preventing the publication of a private laboratory's business approach. The lack of emphasis on the 'business case' in forensic literature has the potential to mislead R&D scientists who may consequently fail to consider such factors when performing their own research.
全球范围内的法医服务机构在资金和基础设施方面常常面临巨大挑战。规模较小的司法管辖区或法医资源稀缺的地区,在处理刑事案件时面临着复杂的选择,有多种方案可供选择。这些选择往往涉及成本、时间和数据质量之间的权衡。面对这些决策,该领域认识到这些司法管辖区所面临的现实情况、讨论每种方法的利弊并确定做出此类决策的框架变得至关重要。这篇新颖的论文回顾了现有文献,并确定了三种主要的解决方案以供考虑:1)使用卫星实验室进行样本分流,2)使用主要的区域实验室进行全面的法医分析,3)警方使用快速DNA技术来减少积压案件。除了这些策略外,还考虑了每种所述选项在成本和质量方面的影响。虽然文献支持这样的观点,即一些方法可以通过缩短周转时间来降低下游成本,但在考虑这些选项(包括使用成本效益分析或案例研究)时,用于支持决策的商业案例的数据有限,这凸显了本文的新颖性。这可能是由于法医部门的商业化性质阻碍了私人实验室商业方法的公布。法医文献中对“商业案例”缺乏强调,有可能误导研发科学家,他们在进行自己的研究时可能因此未能考虑这些因素。