Suppr超能文献

肯尼亚对移动医疗和面对面治疗抑郁症和创伤后应激障碍的偏好:人口统计学和临床特征。

Preference of mHealth versus in-person treatment for depression and post-traumatic stress disorder in Kenya: demographic and clinical characteristics.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA

Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 18;14(11):e083094. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083094.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We conducted an implementation science mental health treatment study in western Kenya, testing strategies for scale up of evidence-based mental health services for common adult disorders using a non-specialist workforce, integrated with existing primary care (Sequential Multiple, Assignment Randomized Trial of non-specialist-delivered psychotherapy (Interpersonal Psychotherapy) and/or medication (fluoxetine) for major depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (SMART DAPPER)). Because study launch coincided with the COVID-19 pandemic, participants were allowed to attend treatment visits via mHealth (audio-only mobile phone) or in-person. We conducted a secondary data analysis of the parent study to evaluate preference for mHealth or in-person treatment among our study participants, including rationale for choosing in-person or mHealth treatment modality, and comparison of baseline demographic and clinical characteristics.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS: Participants were public sector primary care patients at Kisumu County Hospital in western Kenya with major depression and/or PTSD and were individually randomised to non-specialist delivery of evidence-based psychotherapy or medication (n=2162).

OUTCOMES

Treatment modality preference and rationale were ascertained before randomised assignment to treatment arm (psychotherapy or medication). The parent SMART DAPPER study baseline assessment included core demographic (age, gender, relationship status, income, clinic transport time and cost) and clinical data (eg, depression and PTSD symptoms, trauma exposures, medical comorbidities and history of mental healthcare). Given that this evaluation of mHealth treatment preference sought to identify the demographic and clinical characteristics of participants who chose in-person or mHealth treatment modality, we included most SMART DAPPER core measurement domains (not all subcategories).

RESULTS

649 (30.3%) SMART DAPPER participants preferred treatment via mHealth, rather than in person. The most cited rationales for choosing mHealth were affordability (18.5%) (eg, no transportation cost) and convenience (12.9%). On multivariate analysis, compared with those who preferred in-person treatment, participants who chose mHealth were younger and had higher constraints on receiving in-person treatment, including transport time 1.004 (1.00, 1.007) and finances 0.757 (0.612, 0.936). Higher PTSD symptoms 0.527 (0.395, 0.702) and higher disability 0.741 (0.559, 0.982) were associated with preference for in-person treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first study of public sector mental healthcare delivered by non-specialists via mHealth for major depression and/or PTSD in Sub-Saharan Africa. Our finding that mHealth treatment is preferred by approximately one-third of participants, particularly younger individuals with barriers to in-person care, may inform future mHealth research to (1) address knowledge gaps in mental health service implementation and (2) improve mental healthcare access to evidence-based treatment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03466346.

摘要

目的

我们在肯尼亚西部进行了一项实施科学心理健康治疗研究,测试使用非专业人员的劳动力扩大常见成人疾病的循证心理健康服务的策略,与现有初级保健相结合(非专业人员提供的心理治疗(人际心理治疗)和/或药物(氟西汀)治疗抑郁症和创伤后应激障碍( PTSD)的顺序多项,分配随机试验)(SMART DAPPER))。由于研究启动恰逢 COVID-19 大流行,参与者可以通过移动健康(仅音频移动电话)或亲自接受治疗访问。我们对母研究进行了二次数据分析,以评估我们的研究参与者对移动健康或面对面治疗的偏好,包括选择面对面或移动健康治疗模式的理由,以及比较基线人口统计学和临床特征。

设计、地点、参与者和干预措施:参与者是肯尼亚西部基苏木县医院的公共部门初级保健患者,患有抑郁症和/或 PTSD,并被单独随机分配接受非专业人员提供的循证心理治疗或药物治疗(n=2162)。

结果

在随机分配到治疗臂(心理治疗或药物治疗)之前,确定了治疗模式偏好和理由。SMART DAPPER 研究的基线评估包括核心人口统计学(年龄、性别、关系状况、收入、诊所交通时间和费用)和临床数据(例如,抑郁和 PTSD 症状、创伤暴露、合并症和精神保健史)。鉴于对移动健康治疗偏好的这种评估旨在确定选择面对面或移动健康治疗模式的参与者的人口统计学和临床特征,我们包括了 SMART DAPPER 的大多数核心测量领域(并非所有子类别)。

结论

据我们所知,这是第一项在撒哈拉以南非洲地区由非专业人员通过移动健康提供的针对抑郁症和/或 PTSD 的公共部门心理健康护理研究。我们发现,大约三分之一的参与者更喜欢移动健康治疗,特别是那些面对面护理有障碍的年轻个体,这可能为未来的移动健康研究提供信息,(1)解决心理健康服务实施方面的知识差距,(2)改善获得循证治疗的精神保健机会。

试验注册

NCT03466346。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验