Suppr超能文献

简易体能状况量表(SARC-F)及其修订版和肌少症生活质量问卷对养老院居民肌少症筛查的诊断准确性分析

Diagnostic accuracy analysis of SARC-F, its modified versions and the Quality of Life in Sarcopenia questionnaire in screening for sarcopenia in nursing home residents.

作者信息

Şimşek Hilal, Uçar Aslı

机构信息

Graduate School of Health Sciences, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Ankara University, Ankara, Türkiye.

Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University, Niğde, Türkiye.

出版信息

Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2024 Dec;24(12):1335-1342. doi: 10.1111/ggi.15020. Epub 2024 Nov 18.

Abstract

AIM

Sarcopenia, which is among the most important geriatric syndromes, is also a public health challenge. This study evaluated the performance of the SARC-F, its modified versions and the Quality of Life in Sarcopenia (SarQoL) in screening for sarcopenia.

METHODS

In the diagnostic accuracy study carried out with a total of 195 nursing home residents, sarcopenia was evaluated according to the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older Persons 2 algorithm. For SARC-CalFs, the calf circumference standard and its population-specific reference (31 cm, 32/33 cm, respectively) were used, whereas for SARC + elderly and body mass index information, age (>75 years) and body mass index (<21 kg/m) were used. Screening test performance was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic analysis, and the optimal cut-off points were determined according to the Youden index.

RESULTS

The prevalence of sarcopenia was 33.8%. Although SarQoL and SARC-CalF scores were lower in individuals with sarcopenia, standard SARC-F and SARC-F + elderly and body mass index information scores were not different. SARC-F had the poorest screening performance, whereas the SarQoL scale had the best screening performance (area under the curve 0.502 vs 0.787). SARC-CalF (32/33 cm) had the best performance among the modified versions of SARC-F. The optimal cut-off point for SarQoL was <64.56, and its sensitivity in sarcopenia screening was 74.24% (95% CI 62.0-84.2) and its specificity was 79.07% (95% CI 71.0-85.7). All the modified versions of SARC-CalF had higher sensitivity and area under the curve compared with SARC-F.

CONCLUSIONS

SarQoL screening performance might be conducive to providing clinical discrimination in a nursing home sample. Further research is needed for the use of SarQoL as a potential sarcopenia screening strategy. Additionally, SARC-CalFs, especially the population-specific SARC-CalF (32/33 cm), might improve screening performance compared with standard SARC-F. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; 24: 1335-1342.

摘要

目的

肌肉减少症是最重要的老年综合征之一,也是一项公共卫生挑战。本研究评估了SARC-F、其改良版本以及肌肉减少症生活质量量表(SarQoL)在筛查肌肉减少症方面的表现。

方法

在对总共195名养老院居民进行的诊断准确性研究中,根据欧洲老年人肌肉减少症工作组2算法评估肌肉减少症。对于SARC-CalFs,使用小腿围标准及其特定人群参考值(分别为31厘米、32/33厘米),而对于SARC+老年人和体重指数信息,使用年龄(>75岁)和体重指数(<21千克/米)。通过受试者工作特征分析评估筛查测试的表现,并根据约登指数确定最佳截断点。

结果

肌肉减少症的患病率为33.8%。虽然肌肉减少症患者的SarQoL和SARC-CalF评分较低,但标准SARC-F、SARC-F+老年人和体重指数信息评分并无差异。SARC-F的筛查表现最差,而SarQoL量表的筛查表现最佳(曲线下面积分别为0.502和0.787)。在SARC-F的改良版本中,SARC-CalF(32/33厘米)表现最佳。SarQoL的最佳截断点为<64.56,其在肌肉减少症筛查中的敏感性为74.24%(95%置信区间62.0-84.2),特异性为79.07%(95%置信区间71.0-85.7)。与SARC-F相比,所有SARC-CalF的改良版本均具有更高的敏感性和曲线下面积。

结论

SarQoL筛查表现可能有助于在养老院样本中进行临床鉴别。将SarQoL用作潜在的肌肉减少症筛查策略还需要进一步研究。此外,与标准SARC-F相比,SARC-CalFs,尤其是特定人群的SARC-CalF(32/33厘米),可能会提高筛查表现。《老年医学与老年病学国际杂志》2024年;24:1335-1342

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efd0/11995832/2f5ea0349256/GGI-24-1335-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验