• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

炎症为基础的营养工具(格拉斯哥预后评分)与血液肿瘤患者住院时间的相关性。

The association between an inflammation-based nutritional tool (Glasgow Prognostic Score) and length of hospital stay in patients with haematological cancer.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Nutrition, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.

Department of Haematology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2024 Nov 19;32(12):804. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-09021-0.

DOI:10.1007/s00520-024-09021-0
PMID:39557734
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This is a retrospective study to identify if Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) is associated with length of hospital stay (LOS) in haematological cancer.

METHODS

The participants were adult inpatients at a single centre in between 2018 and 2022. Serum levels of CRP and albumin were measured at admission. GPS was calculated as follows: point "0" as CRP < 10 mg/L and albumin ≥ 35 g/L; point "2" as CRP ≥ 10 mg/L and albumin < 35 g/L; point "1" as either CRP ≥ 10 mg/L or albumin < 35 g/L. Patients with point "0" were classified as low risk whilst point "2" as high risk. LOS was defined as the interval between the admission and discharge date.

RESULTS

As a result, the average age was 59.6 ± 12.6 years and the average LOS was 6.0 days (IQR = 2 days, 11 days). Of 1621 patients, 8.8% of them were high risk. GPS was associated with LOS (β = 2.7 days; 95% CI = 0.8 days, 4.6 days; p trend < 0.001) after full adjustment. Each point of GPS was associated with 1.9 days (95% CI = 1.4 days, 2.4 days) longer in LOS with full adjustment. The association was more prominent in younger patients (< 65 years), patients with leukaemia and myelodysplastic syndrome, and those with normal body weight status (18.5-24 kg/m), compared with their counterparts.

CONCLUSION

GPS was associated with LOS in Chinese patients with haematological cancer, indicating GPS could be a useful tool to predict outcome.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在确定格拉斯哥预后评分(GPS)是否与血液系统恶性肿瘤患者的住院时间(LOS)相关。

方法

研究对象为 2018 年至 2022 年间在某单中心住院的成年患者。入院时检测血清 CRP 和白蛋白水平。GPS 计算方法如下:CRP<10mg/L 且白蛋白≥35g/L 为 0 分;CRP≥10mg/L 且白蛋白<35g/L 为 2 分;CRP≥10mg/L 或白蛋白<35g/L 为 1 分。CRP<10mg/L 且白蛋白≥35g/L 患者归为低危组,CRP≥10mg/L 且白蛋白<35g/L 患者归为高危组。LOS 定义为入院日期至出院日期之间的时间间隔。

结果

本研究共纳入 1621 例患者,平均年龄为 59.6±12.6 岁,平均 LOS 为 6.0 天(IQR=2 天,11 天)。其中高危组患者占 8.8%。多因素调整后,GPS 与 LOS 相关(β=2.7 天;95%CI=0.8 天,4.6 天;p 趋势<0.001)。GPS 每增加 1 分,LOS 延长 1.9 天(95%CI=1.4 天,2.4 天)。在年龄<65 岁、白血病和骨髓增生异常综合征患者、体重正常(18.5-24kg/m2)患者中,GPS 与 LOS 的相关性更为显著。

结论

在中国血液系统恶性肿瘤患者中,GPS 与 LOS 相关,提示 GPS 可能是预测预后的有用工具。

相似文献

1
The association between an inflammation-based nutritional tool (Glasgow Prognostic Score) and length of hospital stay in patients with haematological cancer.炎症为基础的营养工具(格拉斯哥预后评分)与血液肿瘤患者住院时间的相关性。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Nov 19;32(12):804. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-09021-0.
2
The relationship between Glasgow Prognostic Score and hospital duration in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases.炎症性肠病患者格拉斯哥预后评分与住院时间的关系。
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2024 Sep;33(3):362-369. doi: 10.6133/apjcn.202409_33(3).0006.
3
An inflammation-based prognostic score, the C-reactive protein/albumin ratio predicts the morbidity and mortality of patients on parenteral nutrition.基于炎症的预后评分,C 反应蛋白/白蛋白比值可预测肠外营养患者的发病率和死亡率。
Clin Nutr. 2018 Oct;37(5):1575-1583. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.08.013. Epub 2017 Aug 21.
4
Can the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) Be Used as a Nutrition Evaluation Tool for Subacute Inpatients over an Average Length of Stay?迷你营养评估(MNA)能否作为平均住院时间较长的亚急性住院患者的营养评估工具?
J Nutr Health Aging. 2015 Dec;19(10):1032-6. doi: 10.1007/s12603-015-0665-y.
5
Glasgow Prognostic Score Class 2 Predicts Prolonged Intensive Care Unit Stay in Patients Undergoing Pneumonectomy.格拉斯哥预后评分2级预测肺切除患者重症监护病房住院时间延长。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Dec;102(6):1898-1904. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.05.111. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
6
The Inflammation-Based Glasgow Prognostic Score as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Intensive Cardiovascular Care Unit.炎症为基础的格拉斯哥预后评分作为重症心血管病监护病房患者的预后因素。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2019 May 15;55(5):139. doi: 10.3390/medicina55050139.
7
Nutritional assessment associated with length of inpatients' hospital stay.与住院患者住院时长相关的营养评估
Nutr Hosp. 2012 Mar-Apr;27(2):542-7. doi: 10.1590/S0212-16112012000200029.
8
The Glasgow Prognostic Score. An useful tool to predict survival in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.格拉斯哥预后评分。预测晚期食管鳞状细胞癌患者生存率的有用工具。
Acta Cir Bras. 2015 Aug;30(8):580-5. doi: 10.1590/S0102-8650201500800000010.
9
Correlation between Prognostic Nutritional Index, Glasgow Prognostic Score, Systemic Inflammatory Response, and TNM Staging in Colorectal Cancer Patients.结直肠癌患者预后营养指数、格拉斯哥预后评分、全身炎症反应与 TNM 分期的相关性。
Nutr Cancer. 2020;72(7):1170-1177. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2019.1675725. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
10
The prognostic value of the preoperative c-reactive protein/albumin ratio in ovarian cancer.术前C反应蛋白/白蛋白比值在卵巢癌中的预后价值
BMC Cancer. 2017 Apr 21;17(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3220-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Hope as a bridge to post-traumatic growth.希望是通往创伤后成长的桥梁。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Dec 9;33(1):10. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-09063-4.

本文引用的文献

1
A comprehensive analysis of Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS)/the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) on immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy among patients with advanced cancer.全面分析格拉斯哥预后评分(GPS)/改良的格拉斯哥预后评分(mGPS)对晚期癌症患者免疫检查点抑制剂疗效的影响。
Cancer Med. 2023 Jan;12(1):38-48. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4940. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
2
High CRP-albumin ratio predicts poor prognosis in transplant ineligible elderly patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia.高 C 反应蛋白-白蛋白比值可预测新诊断的不适合移植的老年急性髓系白血病患者的预后不良。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 25;12(1):8885. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12813-1.
3
Prediction of clinical outcomes through assessment of sarcopenia and adipopenia using computed tomography in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia.
利用计算机断层扫描评估急性髓系白血病成年患者的肌肉减少症和脂肪减少症预测临床结局。
Int J Hematol. 2021 Jul;114(1):44-52. doi: 10.1007/s12185-021-03122-w. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
4
Impact of treatment-related weight changes from diagnosis to hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation on clinical outcome of acute myeloid leukemia.从诊断到造血干细胞移植治疗相关体重变化对急性髓系白血病临床结局的影响。
Int J Hematol. 2019 Jun;109(6):673-683. doi: 10.1007/s12185-019-02647-5. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
5
Prognostic impact of skeletal muscle assessed by computed tomography in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.计算机断层扫描评估急性髓系白血病患者骨骼肌的预后影响。
Ann Hematol. 2019 Feb;98(2):351-359. doi: 10.1007/s00277-018-3508-1. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
6
Serum albumin or body mass index: Which prognostic factor for survival in patients with acute myeloblastic leukaemia?血清白蛋白或体重指数:急性髓细胞性白血病患者生存的哪个预后因素?
Hematol Oncol. 2019 Feb;37(1):80-84. doi: 10.1002/hon.2543. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
7
Glasgow prognostic score is superior to other inflammation-based scores in predicting survival of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.格拉斯哥预后评分在预测弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤的生存率方面优于其他基于炎症的评分。
Oncotarget. 2017 Sep 11;8(44):76740-76748. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.20832. eCollection 2017 Sep 29.
8
C-reactive protein binds to integrin α2 and Fcγ receptor I, leading to breast cell adhesion and breast cancer progression.C-反应蛋白与整合素 α2 和 Fcγ 受体 I 结合,导致乳腺细胞黏附并促进乳腺癌进展。
Oncogene. 2018 Jan 4;37(1):28-38. doi: 10.1038/onc.2017.298. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
9
Prognostic factors and outcomes in metastatic uveal melanoma treated with programmed cell death-1 or combined PD-1/cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 inhibition.程序性细胞死亡蛋白1或联合程序性死亡蛋白1/细胞毒性T淋巴细胞相关抗原4抑制治疗转移性葡萄膜黑色素瘤的预后因素及结局
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Sep;82:56-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.05.038. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
10
Glasgow Prognostic Score Class 2 Predicts Prolonged Intensive Care Unit Stay in Patients Undergoing Pneumonectomy.格拉斯哥预后评分2级预测肺切除患者重症监护病房住院时间延长。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Dec;102(6):1898-1904. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.05.111. Epub 2016 Aug 20.