Suppr超能文献

在 VERITAS 队列中,没有既定吸烟史的电子烟使用者的呼吸症状。

Respiratory symptoms among e-cigarette users without an established smoking history in the VERITAS cohort.

机构信息

International Network of Nicotine Consumer Organisations (INNCO), Vejle, Denmark.

Asociación de Reducción de Daños del Tabaquismo (ARDT Iberoamérica), Bogota, Colombia.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 18;14(1):28549. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-80221-8.

Abstract

Prior research on e-cigarettes' health impacts is inconclusive due to confounding by previous tobacco smoking. Studies of e-cigarette use among people without an established smoking history are informative for this question. A cross-sectional survey was administered across six geopolitical world regions to adults aged 18+ without a history of established cigarette smoking or regular use of other nicotine/tobacco products. Two cohorts were defined based on e-cigarette use: "Vapers Cohort" (N = 491) who used e-cigarettes in the past 7 days and "Control Cohort" (N = 247) who never regularly used e-cigarettes. Frequency of respiratory symptoms (Respiratory Symptom Evaluation Score (RSES)) were compared between cohorts, adjusting for sociodemographics. Tobacco use history and patterns of e-cigarette use was also examined. Respiratory symptoms were rare among both the Vapers and Control Cohorts: 83.3% and 88.4%, respectively, reported "rarely" or "never" experiencing all five RSES items (p = 0.125). The Vapers (vs. Control) Cohort reported modestly more frequent respiratory symptoms (adjusted mean RSES 1.61 vs. 1.43, respectively, p < 0.001); however, this difference (0.18) did not reach the threshold of clinical relevance (0.57). The Vapers (vs. Control) Cohort more often reported former cigarette experimentation (30.8% vs. 12.1%) and former infrequent use of other nicotine/tobacco products (18.1% vs. 5.8%). The Vapers Cohort most often used disposable devices (63.7%) and multiple flavors (approximately 70-80% across primary device type). In this cohort of adults without a history of established combustible tobacco use, e-cigarette use was statistically linked to more frequent respiratory symptoms, though not in a clinically meaningful way. The cross-sectional design of this study cannot establish causality between e-cigarette use and respiratory symptoms.

摘要

先前关于电子烟健康影响的研究结果并不一致,这是由于受到先前吸烟情况的混杂影响。因此,研究没有吸烟史的电子烟使用情况对于回答这个问题很有帮助。本研究采用横断面调查的方式,在六个地缘政治区域调查了年龄在 18 岁及以上、没有吸烟史或没有定期使用其他尼古丁/烟草制品的成年人。根据电子烟使用情况,将参与者分为两个队列:“电子烟使用者队列”(N=491),即在过去 7 天内使用过电子烟;“对照组”(N=247),从不定期使用电子烟。在调整社会人口统计学因素后,比较了两个队列之间的呼吸道症状频率(呼吸道症状评估得分(RSES))。还检查了烟草使用史和电子烟使用模式。在电子烟使用者和对照组中,呼吸道症状都很少见:分别有 83.3%和 88.4%的人报告说,他们经历过所有五个 RSES 项目中的“很少”或“从不”(p=0.125)。与对照组相比,电子烟使用者报告的呼吸道症状更为频繁(调整后的平均 RSES 分别为 1.61 和 1.43,p<0.001);然而,这种差异(0.18)并没有达到临床相关的阈值(0.57)。与对照组相比,电子烟使用者更常报告曾经尝试过香烟(30.8%比 12.1%)和曾经不经常使用其他尼古丁/烟草制品(18.1%比 5.8%)。电子烟使用者最常使用一次性设备(63.7%)和多种口味(各种主要设备类型中约有 70-80%)。在这个没有使用过可燃烟草制品的成年人队列中,电子烟的使用与更为频繁的呼吸道症状相关,但并没有达到临床意义的程度。本研究的横断面设计不能确定电子烟使用与呼吸道症状之间的因果关系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fba/11574031/d28b18099045/41598_2024_80221_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验