• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直接卫生机构筹资对母婴健康服务提供的影响:来自坦桑尼亚潘加尼地区的一项比较性前后研究结果。

The impact of direct health facility financing on MNCH service provision: results from a comparative, before-after study in Pwani Region, Tanzania.

机构信息

Korea Foundation for International Healthcare (KOFIH) Tanzania Office, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

School of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 18;24(1):1424. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11917-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-024-11917-w
PMID:39558315
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11571650/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pwani Regional Secretariat in Tanzania implemented the Maternal, Neonatal, and Child Health Project (2016-2022) through Direct Health Facility Financing (DHFF), which allocates funds directly to health facilities. This study assessed the impact of the six-year DHFF project in Pwani region.

METHODS

The study utilised District Health Information Software 2 data from 18 intervention health facilities in Pwani region. Control groups comprised an equal number of facilities from Pwani and Dodoma regions where the project was not implemented. Key indicators assessed included 'ANC 4 + Rate (%)', 'Percentage of Mothers tested for Anaemia during ANC', 'Caesarean Section Delivery Rate (%)', 'Percentage of Mothers and Newborns receiving PNC services within 48 hours', 'Delivery Complication Rate (%)', and 'SBA Delivery Rate (%)' which are associated with the project interventions. The impact of the project was analysed using a paired sample t-test comparing baseline and endline data. We evaluated the significance of the dependent variables using one-way ANOVA with control groups, with the Tukey-Kramer test for post hoc analysis. Chi-square test assessed the significance of Caesarean Section Delivery Rate and the relationship between variables and health facility conditions. Pearson correlation test was used for significance between funding size and the change of MNCH variables. Statistical significance at 0.05 was calculated.

RESULTS

The project showed limited positive impacts, only in the 'Percentage of Mothers tested for Anaemia during ANC' (****p < 0.0001), 'Percentage of Newborns receiving PNC within 48 hours' (**p = 0.0095), and 'SBA Delivery Rate' (***p = 0.0043). The health facility assessment identified positively influencing factors on service delivery, such as facility type (*p = 0.0347), distance to the facility (****p < 0.0001), and internet connectivity (*p = 0.0186). We found that the project did not improve most MNCH indicators, including the CEmONC coverage (χ2 = 2.82, p = 0.2448, df = 2), which was known to be the leading outcome.

CONCLUSION

The project had limited impacts on MNCH outcomes due to various factors. While the health facility assessment highlighted positive influences on service delivery, significant areas for improvement remain, including referral systems and infrastructure. Operational research findings indicate that the effectiveness of the DHFF could be enhanced by refining its management and governance structures.

摘要

背景

坦桑尼亚的巴尼亚地区秘书处在 2016 年至 2022 年期间通过直接卫生机构供资(DHFF)实施了孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康项目,该项目将资金直接分配给卫生机构。本研究评估了该项目在巴尼亚地区六年的影响。

方法

该研究利用了来自巴尼亚地区 18 个干预卫生机构的地区卫生信息软件 2 数据。对照组由来自巴尼亚和多多马地区的同等数量的设施组成,这些地区没有实施该项目。评估的关键指标包括“ANC 4+率(%)”、“ANC 期间接受贫血检测的母亲比例(%)”、“剖宫产分娩率(%)”、“48 小时内接受 PNC 服务的母亲和新生儿比例(%)”、“分娩并发症率(%)”和“SBA 分娩率(%)”,这些指标与项目干预措施相关。使用配对样本 t 检验比较基线和终线数据来分析项目的影响。我们使用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)评估对照组中因变量的显著性,并使用 Tukey-Kramer 检验进行事后分析。卡方检验评估剖宫产分娩率的显著性以及变量之间的关系和卫生机构条件。Pearson 相关检验用于检验资金规模与 MNCH 变量变化之间的显著性。计算 0.05 水平的统计学显著性。

结果

该项目仅在“ANC 期间接受贫血检测的母亲比例(****p<0.0001)”、“48 小时内接受 PNC 服务的新生儿比例(**p=0.0095)”和“SBA 分娩率(***p=0.0043)”方面显示出有限的积极影响。卫生机构评估确定了对服务提供有积极影响的因素,例如设施类型(*p=0.0347)、距离设施的距离(****p<0.0001)和互联网连接(*p=0.0186)。我们发现该项目并没有改善大多数母婴健康指标,包括孕产妇基本急救能力(CEmONC)覆盖率(χ2=2.82,p=0.2448,df=2),这是主要的结果。

结论

由于各种因素,该项目对母婴健康结果的影响有限。虽然卫生机构评估突出了对服务提供的积极影响,但仍有重大的改进领域,包括转诊系统和基础设施。运营研究结果表明,通过改进直接卫生机构供资的管理和治理结构,可以提高其效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23c0/11571650/9ba90541466d/12913_2024_11917_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23c0/11571650/f71b28869eed/12913_2024_11917_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23c0/11571650/f7e76c03335c/12913_2024_11917_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23c0/11571650/9ba90541466d/12913_2024_11917_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23c0/11571650/f71b28869eed/12913_2024_11917_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23c0/11571650/f7e76c03335c/12913_2024_11917_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23c0/11571650/9ba90541466d/12913_2024_11917_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The impact of direct health facility financing on MNCH service provision: results from a comparative, before-after study in Pwani Region, Tanzania.直接卫生机构筹资对母婴健康服务提供的影响:来自坦桑尼亚潘加尼地区的一项比较性前后研究结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 18;24(1):1424. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11917-w.
2
Understanding the implementation of Direct Health Facility Financing and its effect on health system performance in Tanzania: a non-controlled before and after mixed method study protocol.了解坦桑尼亚直接卫生机构融资的实施情况及其对卫生系统绩效的影响:一项非对照前后混合方法研究方案。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Jan 30;17(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0400-3.
3
Assessment of strategic healthcare purchasing and financial autonomy in Tanzania: the case of results-based financing and health basket fund.坦桑尼亚战略性医疗采购和财务自主权评估:以基于成果的融资和医疗篮子基金为例。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 12;11:1260236. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1260236. eCollection 2023.
4
Evaluation of the Direct Health Facility Financing Program in Improving Maternal Health Services in Pangani District, Tanzania.坦桑尼亚潘加尼区直接卫生机构融资计划对改善孕产妇保健服务的评估。
Int J Womens Health. 2021 Dec 9;13:1227-1242. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S333900. eCollection 2021.
5
Implementation of direct health facility financing in the rural District of Kigoma in Western Tanzania.坦桑尼亚西部基戈马地区农村直接卫生机构筹资的实施。
Pan Afr Med J. 2023 Sep 14;46:19. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2023.46.19.41052. eCollection 2023.
6
Evaluation of a comprehensive maternal newborn health intervention in rural Tanzania: single-arm pre-post coverage survey results.坦桑尼亚农村地区一项综合性孕产妇新生儿健康干预措施的评估:单组前后覆盖情况调查结果
Glob Health Action. 2022 Dec 31;15(1):2137281. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2022.2137281.
7
The impact of training on self-reported performance in reproductive, maternal, and newborn health service delivery among healthcare workers in Tanzania: a baseline- and endline-survey.培训对坦桑尼亚医疗工作者在生殖、孕产妇和新生儿健康服务提供方面自我报告绩效的影响:基线和终线调查。
Reprod Health. 2022 Jun 20;19(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01452-4.
8
Quality of routine health facility data for monitoring maternal, newborn and child health indicators: A desk review of DHIS2 data in Lumbini Province, Nepal.常规卫生机构数据质量监测孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康指标:尼泊尔蓝毗尼省 DHIS2 数据的桌面审查。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 1;19(4):e0298101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298101. eCollection 2024.
9
Readiness to provide comprehensive emergency obstetric and neonatal care: a cross-sectional study in 30 health facilities in Tanzania.提供全面的紧急产科和新生儿护理的准备情况:坦桑尼亚30个医疗机构的横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jul 31;24(1):870. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11317-0.
10
The effects of MCH insurance cards on improving equity in access and use of maternal and child health care services in Tanzania: a mixed methods analysis.妇幼保健保险卡在改善坦桑尼亚妇幼保健服务获取和利用公平性方面的作用:一项混合方法分析
J Health Popul Nutr. 2016 Nov 18;35(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s41043-016-0075-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementation of direct health facility financing in the rural District of Kigoma in Western Tanzania.坦桑尼亚西部基戈马地区农村直接卫生机构筹资的实施。
Pan Afr Med J. 2023 Sep 14;46:19. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2023.46.19.41052. eCollection 2023.
2
Understanding the implication of direct health facility financing on health commodities availability in Tanzania.了解坦桑尼亚直接的医疗机构融资对卫生用品供应情况的影响。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 May 8;3(5):e0001867. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001867. eCollection 2023.
3
Scale up and strengthening of comprehensive emergency obstetric and newborn care in Tanzania.
坦桑尼亚扩大和加强综合产科和新生儿急救护理。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 8;17(7):e0271282. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271282. eCollection 2022.
4
A Comprehensive Approach to Improving Emergency Obstetric and Newborn Care in Kigoma, Tanzania.改善坦桑尼亚基戈马地区产科急症和新生儿护理的综合方法
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2022 Apr 29;10(2). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00485. Print 2022 Apr 28.
5
Acceptability of the Direct Health Facility Financing (DHFF) initiative in Tanzania: A mixed methods process evaluation of the moderating factors.坦桑尼亚直接卫生机构融资(DHFF)倡议的可接受性:对调节因素的混合方法过程评估
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2022 May;37(3):1381-1401. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3402. Epub 2021 Dec 24.
6
Evaluation of the Direct Health Facility Financing Program in Improving Maternal Health Services in Pangani District, Tanzania.坦桑尼亚潘加尼区直接卫生机构融资计划对改善孕产妇保健服务的评估。
Int J Womens Health. 2021 Dec 9;13:1227-1242. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S333900. eCollection 2021.
7
A Theory of Change for Guiding the Integration of Human-Centered Design Into Global Health Programming.一种用于指导以人为本的设计融入全球卫生规划的变革理论。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2021 Nov 29;9(Suppl 2):S209-S216. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00334.
8
The influence of community factors in the implementation of community-based interventions to improve antenatal care: a qualitative study based on the IMCHA programme in Tanzania.社区因素对实施以社区为基础的干预措施以改善产前保健的影响:基于坦桑尼亚 IMCHA 项目的定性研究。
Reprod Health. 2021 Sep 22;18(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01225-5.
9
The influence of contextual factors on healthcare quality improvement initiatives: a realist review.语境因素对医疗质量改进措施的影响:一个现实主义的综述。
Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 26;9(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01344-3.
10
Development and upgrading of public primary healthcare facilities with essential surgical services infrastructure: a strategy towards achieving universal health coverage in Tanzania.发展和升级提供基本外科服务的公立初级保健设施:坦桑尼亚实现全民健康覆盖的战略。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Mar 17;20(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-5057-2.