• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提供全面的紧急产科和新生儿护理的准备情况:坦桑尼亚30个医疗机构的横断面研究。

Readiness to provide comprehensive emergency obstetric and neonatal care: a cross-sectional study in 30 health facilities in Tanzania.

作者信息

Juma Damas, Stordal Ketil, Kamala Benjamin, Bishanga Dunstan R, Kalolo Albino, Moshiro Robert, Kvaløy Jan Terje, Manongi Rachel

机构信息

Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, Kilimanjaro, Tanzania.

Manyara Regional Secretariat, Manyara, Tanzania.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jul 31;24(1):870. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11317-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-024-11317-0
PMID:39085821
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11290101/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the global progress in bringing health services closer to the population, mothers and their newborns still receive substandard care leading to morbidity and mortality. Health facilities' capacity to deliver the service is a prerequisite for quality health care. This study aimed to assess health facilities' readiness to provide comprehensive emergency obstetric and newborn care (CEmONC), comprising of blood transfusion, caesarean section and basic services, and hence to inform improvement in the quality of care interventions in Tanzania.

METHODS

A cross-sectional assessment of 30 CEmONC health facilities implementing the Safer Births Bundle of Care package in five regions of Tanzania was carried out between December 2020 and January 2021. We adapted the World Health Organization's Service Availability and Readiness Assessment tool to assess amenities, equipment, trained staff, guidelines, medicines, and diagnostic facilities. Composite readiness scores were calculated for each category and results were compared at the health facility level. For categorical variables, we tested for differences by Fisher's exact test; for readiness scores, differences were tested by a linear mixed model analysis, taking into account dependencies within the regions. We used p < 0.05 as our level of significance.

RESULTS

The overall readiness to provide CEmONC was 69.0% and significantly higher for regional hospitals followed by district hospitals. Average readiness was 78.9% for basic amenities, 76.7% for medical equipment, 76.0% for diagnosis and treatment commodities, 63.6% for staffing and 50.0% for guidelines. There was a variation in the availability of items at the individual health facility level and across levels of facilities. We found a significant difference in the availability of basic amenities, equipment, staffing, and guidelines between regional, and district hospitals and health centres (p = 0.05). Regional hospitals had significantly higher scores of medical equipment than district hospitals and health centers (p = 0.02). There was no significant difference in the availability of commodities for diagnosis and treatment between different facility levels.

CONCLUSION

Facilities' readiness was inadequate and varied across different levels of the facility. There is room to improve the facilities' readiness to deliver quality maternal and newborn care. The responsible authorities should take immediate actions to address the observed deficiencies while carefully choosing the most effective and feasible interventions and monitoring progress in readiness.

摘要

背景

尽管在全球范围内,使卫生服务更贴近民众方面取得了进展,但母亲及其新生儿仍接受不合格的护理,导致发病和死亡。卫生设施提供服务的能力是优质医疗保健的先决条件。本研究旨在评估卫生设施提供包括输血、剖宫产和基本服务在内的全面紧急产科和新生儿护理(CEmONC)的准备情况,从而为坦桑尼亚护理干预质量的改善提供依据。

方法

2020年12月至2021年1月期间,对坦桑尼亚五个地区实施“安全分娩护理包”的30家CEmONC卫生设施进行了横断面评估。我们采用了世界卫生组织的服务可用性和准备情况评估工具,以评估设施、设备、训练有素的工作人员、指南、药品和诊断设施。计算每个类别的综合准备得分,并在卫生设施层面比较结果。对于分类变量,我们通过Fisher精确检验来检验差异;对于准备得分,差异通过线性混合模型分析进行检验,同时考虑各地区内部的相关性。我们将p < 0.05作为显著性水平。

结果

提供CEmONC的总体准备情况为69.0%,地区医院的准备情况显著高于区医院,其次是区医院。基本设施的平均准备情况为78.9%,医疗设备为76.7%,诊断和治疗用品为76.0%,人员配备为63.6%,指南为50.0%。在各个卫生设施层面以及不同级别的设施之间,物品的可用性存在差异。我们发现地区医院、区医院和卫生中心在基本设施、设备、人员配备和指南的可用性方面存在显著差异(p = 0.05)。地区医院的医疗设备得分显著高于区医院和卫生中心(p = 0.02)。不同级别设施之间诊断和治疗用品的可用性没有显著差异。

结论

设施的准备情况不足,且在不同级别的设施中存在差异。在提高设施提供优质孕产妇和新生儿护理的准备情况方面仍有改进空间。相关当局应立即采取行动,解决观察到的不足之处,同时谨慎选择最有效和可行的干预措施,并监测准备情况的进展。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a30c/11290101/beff5b8b5994/12913_2024_11317_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a30c/11290101/beff5b8b5994/12913_2024_11317_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a30c/11290101/beff5b8b5994/12913_2024_11317_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Readiness to provide comprehensive emergency obstetric and neonatal care: a cross-sectional study in 30 health facilities in Tanzania.提供全面的紧急产科和新生儿护理的准备情况:坦桑尼亚30个医疗机构的横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jul 31;24(1):870. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11317-0.
2
Health facility service availability and readiness to provide basic emergency obstetric and newborn care in a low-resource setting: evidence from a Tanzania National Survey.在资源匮乏的环境下,卫生机构提供基本产科和新生儿急救服务的可得性和准备情况:来自坦桑尼亚全国调查的证据。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 19;9(2):e020608. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020608.
3
Assessment of health facility capacity to provide newborn care in Bangladesh, Haiti, Malawi, Senegal, and Tanzania.孟加拉国、海地、马拉维、塞内加尔和坦桑尼亚卫生设施提供新生儿护理能力的评估。
J Glob Health. 2017 Dec;7(2):020509. doi: 10.7189/jogh.07.020509.
4
Assessment of facility readiness for implementing the WHO/UNICEF standards for improving quality of maternal and newborn care in health facilities - experiences from UNICEF's implementation in three countries of South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa.评估医疗机构落实世界卫生组织/联合国儿童基金会关于提高医疗机构孕产妇和新生儿护理质量标准的准备情况——联合国儿童基金会在南亚和撒哈拉以南非洲三个国家的实施经验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 9;18(1):531. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3334-0.
5
Health facility readiness to care for high risk newborn babies for early childhood development in eastern Uganda.乌干达东部医疗卫生机构对高危新生儿进行幼儿期发展护理的准备情况。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Mar 5;22(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07693-0.
6
Readiness of health facilities to provide safe childbirth in Liberia: a cross-sectional analysis of population surveys, facility censuses and facility birth records.利比里亚卫生机构提供安全分娩服务的准备情况:基于人口调查、机构普查和机构分娩记录的横断面分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Dec 20;22(1):952. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05301-x.
7
Emergency obstetric and neonatal care availability, use, and quality: a cross-sectional study in the city of Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of the Congo, 2011.2011年刚果民主共和国卢本巴希市紧急产科和新生儿护理的可及性、使用情况及质量:一项横断面研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jan 19;17(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1224-9.
8
Basic emergency obstetric and newborn care service availability and readiness in Nepal: Analysis of the 2015 Nepal Health Facility Survey.尼泊尔基本产科和新生儿急救护理服务的提供情况和准备情况:2015 年尼泊尔卫生机构调查分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 21;16(7):e0254561. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254561. eCollection 2021.
9
Changes in health facility readiness for obstetric and neonatal care services in Nepal: an analysis of cross-sectional health facility survey data in 2015 and 2021.尼泊尔产科和新生儿保健服务机构准备情况的变化:2015 年和 2021 年横断面卫生机构调查数据的分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Jan 24;24(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-06138-8.
10
Health facilities preparedness to deliver maternal and newborn health care in Kilifi and Kisii Counties, Kenya.肯尼亚基利菲县和基西县卫生设施提供孕产妇和新生儿保健服务的准备情况。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Aug 16;23(1):868. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09884-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving access to emergency obstetric care in underserved rural Tanzania: a prospective cohort study.改善坦桑尼亚农村贫困地区获得紧急产科护理的机会:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Aug 17;22(1):649. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04951-1.
2
A Comprehensive Approach to Improving Emergency Obstetric and Newborn Care in Kigoma, Tanzania.改善坦桑尼亚基戈马地区产科急症和新生儿护理的综合方法
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2022 Apr 29;10(2). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00485. Print 2022 Apr 28.
3
Health facility readiness to care for high risk newborn babies for early childhood development in eastern Uganda.
乌干达东部医疗卫生机构对高危新生儿进行幼儿期发展护理的准备情况。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Mar 5;22(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07693-0.
4
Readiness of health facilities to provide emergency obstetric care in Papua New Guinea: evidence from a cross-sectional survey.巴布亚新几内亚卫生机构提供紧急产科护理的准备情况:来自横断面调查的证据。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 17;12(2):e050150. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050150.
5
Job performance in healthcare: a systematic review.医疗保健中的工作绩效:系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb 4;22(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07357-5.
6
Strategies for the implementation of clinical practice guidelines in public health: an overview of systematic reviews.公共卫生中临床实践指南实施策略的系统评价概述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Jan 24;20(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00815-4.
7
SaferBirths bundle of care protocol: a stepped-wedge cluster implementation project in 30 public health-facilities in five regions, Tanzania.更安全分娩护理包方案:坦桑尼亚五个地区 30 家公立卫生机构实施的一项阶梯式楔形集群项目。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct 18;21(1):1117. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07145-1.
8
Understanding barriers to implementing referral procedures in the rural and semi-urban district hospitals in Tanzania: Experiences of healthcare providers working in maternity units.了解坦桑尼亚农村和半城市地区医院实施转诊程序的障碍:在妇产科工作的医疗保健提供者的经验。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 26;16(8):e0255475. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255475. eCollection 2021.
9
Cesarean delivery rates, hospital readiness and quality of clinical management in Ethiopia: national results from two cross-sectional emergency obstetric and newborn care assessments.埃塞俄比亚的剖宫产率、医院准备情况及临床管理质量:两项横断面急诊产科和新生儿护理评估的全国结果
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Aug 19;21(1):571. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04008-9.
10
Quality of maternal and newborn hospital care in Brazil: a quality improvement cycle using the WHO assessment and quality tool.巴西的母婴医院护理质量:使用世卫组织评估和质量工具的质量改进周期。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Mar 3;33(1). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab028.