Kinshasa School of Public Health, Université de Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, School of Population and Public Health, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Glob Health Res Policy. 2024 Nov 19;9(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s41256-024-00387-6.
An Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) outbreak occurred in North Kivu between 2018 and 2020. This eastern province of the Democratic Republic of Congo was also grappling with insecurity caused by several armed groups. This study aimed to explore the barriers and facilitators to utilizing Healthcare Facilities (HCFs) by non-Ebola patients during the crisis.
A qualitative case study was conducted in Beni and Butembo with 24 relatives of 15 deceased non-EVD patients, 47 key informants from healthcare workers (HCWs), as well as community leaders. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore three key areas: (i) the participants' illness history, care pathway, care, and social support; (ii) their perceptions of how EVD affected the care outcome; and (iii) their opinions on the preparedness, supply, use, and quality of healthcare before and during the outbreak. All interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analysed using Atlas-ti 8.0.
Nine of the 15 deaths were female and their ages ranged from 7 to 79 years. The causes of death were non-communicable (13) or infectious (2) diseases. Conspiracy theories, failure to establish security, and the concept of the ''Ebola business'' were associated with misinformation and lower levels of trust in government and HCFs. The negative perceptions, fear of being identified as an Ebola case, apprehension about the triage unit, and inadequacy of personal protective equipment resulted in a preference for private or informal HCFs. For half of the deceased's relatives, the Ebola outbreak hastened their death. Conversely, community involvement, employing familiar, neutral, and credible HCWs, and implementing a free care policy increased the number of visits. These results were observable despite a lack of funds, overstretched HCWs, and long waiting time.
Our findings can inform policies before and during future outbreaks to enhance the resilience of routine HCFs by maintaining dialogue between HCWs and patients, and rebuilding confidence in HCFs. Quantitative studies including context analysis are essential to identify the determinants of care-seeking during such a crisis.
2018 年至 2020 年期间,埃博拉病毒病(EVD)在北基伍省爆发。刚果民主共和国的这个东部省份还受到几个武装团体造成的不安全局势的困扰。本研究旨在探讨在危机期间非埃博拉患者利用医疗保健设施(HCFs)的障碍和促进因素。
在贝尼和布滕博进行了一项定性案例研究,共有 15 名非埃博拉死亡患者的 24 名亲属、47 名来自医护人员(HCWs)的关键信息提供者以及社区领袖参与。进行半结构化访谈,以探讨三个关键领域:(i)参与者的病史、护理途径、护理和社会支持;(ii)他们对埃博拉如何影响护理结果的看法;以及(iii)他们对爆发前和爆发期间医疗保健的准备情况、供应、使用和质量的看法。所有访谈均进行了录音、逐字记录,并使用 Atlas-ti 8.0 进行了主题分析。
15 例死亡中有 9 例为女性,年龄在 7 至 79 岁之间。死亡原因是非传染性(13 例)或传染性(2 例)疾病。阴谋论、未能建立安全环境以及“埃博拉生意”的概念与错误信息和对政府和 HCFs 的信任度降低有关。负面看法、害怕被认定为埃博拉病例、对分诊单位的担忧以及个人防护设备不足,导致人们更倾向于选择私人或非正式的 HCFs。对于死者的一半亲属来说,埃博拉疫情加速了他们的死亡。相反,社区参与、雇用熟悉、中立和可信的 HCWs 以及实施免费护理政策增加了就诊次数。尽管资金短缺、医护人员不堪重负以及等待时间长,但这些结果仍然可见。
我们的研究结果可以为未来疫情爆发前和爆发期间的政策提供信息,通过维持 HCWs 与患者之间的对话以及重建对 HCFs 的信心,增强常规 HCFs 的弹性。在这种危机期间,需要进行包括背景分析在内的定量研究,以确定寻求护理的决定因素。