Suppr超能文献

印度北部产业工人中的噪声性听力损失:多种影响因素的故事

Noise Induced Hearing Loss among Industrial Workers in North India: A Tale of Various Influencing Factors.

作者信息

Singh Rao Varinder, Bhagat Sanjeev, Sahni Dimple, Aggarwal Sangeeta, Kaur Tanveer

机构信息

Department of ENT, GMC & RH, Patiala, India.

ENT department, AAS Medicare, Patiala, India.

出版信息

Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Dec;76(6):5369-5378. doi: 10.1007/s12070-024-04980-6. Epub 2024 Aug 12.

Abstract

To study the prevalence and determinants of Noise Induced Hearing Loss (NIHL) among industrial workers. To access the benefit of Distortion Product Oto Acoustic Emissions (DPOAEs) in its early detection as compared to Pure Tone Audiometry (PTA). Detailed in-person questionnaires were filled followed by general and otological examination viz. local and otoscopic examination. NIHL was assessed by tuning fork test, PTA and DPOAEs. 360 participants aged 20-55 years from 6 industries 4 at noise level of 81-90 dBA and 2 at 91-100 dBA. Prevalence of NIHL at 81-90 dBA and 91-100 dBA was 48% and 59% on PTA. Overall Prevalence from 81 to 100 dBA was 49.45% on PTA and 67% on DPOAEs. NIHL was more prevalent at higher noise level, age group higher than 40 years, duration of service greater than 16 years of exposure and continuous noise type. Noise Induced Permanent Threshold Shift (NIPTS) was found to gradually increase at higher noise level and with increase in duration of service. Noise exposure monitoring at work place, engineering controls to reduce noise levels, provision of hearing protection devices, periodic audiometric evaluation of employees and employee's education regarding NIHL are some of the significant aspects to be considered to prevent NIHL.

摘要

研究产业工人中噪声性听力损失(NIHL)的患病率及其决定因素。评估畸变产物耳声发射(DPOAE)相较于纯音听力测试(PTA)在早期检测中的优势。先填写详细的个人问卷,随后进行全身和耳科检查,即局部检查和耳镜检查。通过音叉试验、PTA和DPOAE评估NIHL。360名年龄在20至55岁之间的参与者来自6个行业,其中4个行业的噪声水平为81 - 90分贝,2个行业的噪声水平为91 - 100分贝。在PTA检查中,81 - 90分贝和91 - 100分贝噪声水平下NIHL的患病率分别为48%和59%。81至100分贝噪声水平下PTA的总体患病率为49.45%,DPOAE的总体患病率为67%。NIHL在较高噪声水平、年龄大于40岁、服务年限大于16年的暴露人群以及持续性噪声类型中更为普遍。发现噪声性永久性阈移(NIPTS)在较高噪声水平和随着服务年限增加时逐渐增加。工作场所的噪声暴露监测、降低噪声水平的工程控制措施、提供听力保护装置、对员工进行定期听力测试评估以及对员工进行关于NIHL的教育是预防NIHL需要考虑的一些重要方面。

相似文献

2
Interventions to prevent occupational noise-induced hearing loss.预防职业性噪声性听力损失的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 7;7(7):CD006396. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006396.pub4.
3
Interventions to prevent occupational noise-induced hearing loss.预防职业性噪声性听力损失的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10:CD006396. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006396.pub3.
9
Interventions to promote the wearing of hearing protection.促进佩戴听力保护装置的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19(2):CD005234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005234.pub2.
10
Interventions to prevent occupational noise induced hearing loss.预防职业性噪声性听力损失的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8(3):CD006396. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006396.pub2.

本文引用的文献

5
Noise-induced hearing loss: a modern epidemic?噪声性听力损失:一种现代流行病?
Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2017 May 2;78(5):286-290. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2017.78.5.286.
7
Occupational noise exposure and hearing: a systematic review.职业性噪声暴露与听力:一项系统综述。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2016 Apr;89(3):351-72. doi: 10.1007/s00420-015-1083-5. Epub 2015 Aug 7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验