• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于衡量数字环境中遗产学习的校准量表。一种网络分析方法。

A calibrated scale to measure heritage learning in digital environments. A network analysis approach.

作者信息

Fontal Olaia, Ibañez-Etxeberria Alex, Arias Víctor B, Arias Benito

机构信息

Didactics of Musical, Plastic and Corporal Expression, University of Valladolid, Campus Miguel Delibes, Valladolid, 47011, Spain.

Didactics of Mathematics, Experimental and Social Sciences, University of the Basque Country UPV-EHU, Plaza Oñati, 3, San Sebastián, 20018, Spain.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Oct 19;10(21):e39466. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39466. eCollection 2024 Nov 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39466
PMID:39559234
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11570299/
Abstract

To date, there have been scarcely any published studies dedicated to developing instruments with sufficient guarantees of accuracy, validity, and reliability for the assessment of heritage learning in digital contexts. Furthermore, very few such studies on this subject have employed the network analysis methodology. The present study seeks to address these research gaps by applying network analysis methodology to the responses of 1323 participants concerning 49 items grouped into seven dimensions constituting the Heritage Learning Sequence (knowing, understanding, respecting, valuing, caring, enjoying, and transmitting). Network estimation was conducted using the Gaussian Graphical Model with regularization, ensuring both the accuracy of the network and the stability of centrality indices. The results indicate that satisfactory values have been achieved in both the network structure and in terms of predictability, replicability, and sensitivity. Finally, the invariance of the network structure among groups (male/female and random subsamples) has been demonstrated. These findings offer promising avenues for further research on heritage learning assessment using the network analysis methodology.

摘要

迄今为止,几乎没有已发表的研究致力于开发在数字环境中评估遗产学习时具有足够准确性、有效性和可靠性保证的工具。此外,关于这个主题的此类研究很少采用网络分析方法。本研究旨在通过将网络分析方法应用于1323名参与者对49个项目的回答来填补这些研究空白,这些项目分为构成遗产学习序列的七个维度(知晓、理解、尊重、重视、关心、欣赏和传承)。使用带有正则化的高斯图形模型进行网络估计,确保网络的准确性和中心性指标的稳定性。结果表明,在网络结构以及可预测性、可重复性和敏感性方面都取得了令人满意的值。最后,证明了各组(男性/女性和随机子样本)之间网络结构的不变性。这些发现为使用网络分析方法进一步研究遗产学习评估提供了有希望的途径。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b954/11570299/c00a3d792c1b/gr11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b954/11570299/4fd9d7217477/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b954/11570299/714ad8c25de0/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b954/11570299/e5ca9e9fcdae/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b954/11570299/f52cdb90c8e4/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b954/11570299/1ee4f47a770c/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b954/11570299/e0c854502d6d/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b954/11570299/091377f6acb6/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b954/11570299/f3515a0dd393/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b954/11570299/355e03f27ade/gr9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b954/11570299/20d5fe7b2fa9/gr10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b954/11570299/c00a3d792c1b/gr11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b954/11570299/4fd9d7217477/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b954/11570299/714ad8c25de0/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b954/11570299/e5ca9e9fcdae/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b954/11570299/f52cdb90c8e4/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b954/11570299/1ee4f47a770c/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b954/11570299/e0c854502d6d/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b954/11570299/091377f6acb6/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b954/11570299/f3515a0dd393/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b954/11570299/355e03f27ade/gr9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b954/11570299/20d5fe7b2fa9/gr10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b954/11570299/c00a3d792c1b/gr11.jpg

相似文献

1
A calibrated scale to measure heritage learning in digital environments. A network analysis approach.一种用于衡量数字环境中遗产学习的校准量表。一种网络分析方法。
Heliyon. 2024 Oct 19;10(21):e39466. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39466. eCollection 2024 Nov 15.
2
Q-Herilearn: Assessing heritage learning in digital environments. A mixed approach with factor and IRT models.Q-Herilearn:数字环境中的遗产学习评估。一种结合因素和IRT 模型的混合方法。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 29;19(3):e0299733. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299733. eCollection 2024.
3
Bayesian Estimation for Gaussian Graphical Models: Structure Learning, Predictability, and Network Comparisons.贝叶斯估计在高斯图模型中的应用:结构学习、可预测性以及网络比较。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2021 Mar-Apr;56(2):336-352. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2021.1894412. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
4
[Psychometric characteristics of questionnaires designed to assess the knowledge, perceptions and practices of health care professionals with regards to alcoholic patients].[旨在评估医护人员对酒精依赖患者的知识、认知及实践情况的调查问卷的心理测量学特征]
Encephale. 2004 Sep-Oct;30(5):437-46. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95458-9.
5
[French validation of the Verona Service Satisfaction Scale-VSSS-54F].[《维罗纳服务满意度量表 - VSSS - 54F》的法语验证]
Encephale. 2003 Mar-Apr;29(2):110-8.
6
A Network Analysis Study on the Structure and Gender Invariance of the Satisfaction with Life Scale among Spanish University Students.西班牙大学生生活满意度量表结构及性别不变性的网络分析研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jan 18;12(2):237. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12020237.
7
A learning ecology-based approach for enhancing Digital Holocaust Memory in European cultural heritage education.一种基于学习生态的方法,用于在欧洲文化遗产教育中强化数字大屠杀记忆。
Heliyon. 2023 Aug 22;9(9):e19286. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19286. eCollection 2023 Sep.
8
[Validation of the QFS measuring the frequency and satisfaction in social behaviours in psychiatric adult population].[用于评估成年精神病患者社交行为频率与满意度的QFS量表的验证]
Encephale. 2006 Jan-Feb;32(1 Pt 1):45-59. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(06)76136-x.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
Digital Twinning for 20th Century Concrete Heritage: HBIM Cognitive Model for Torino Esposizioni Halls.数字孪生 20 世纪混凝土遗产:都灵展览厅的 HBIM 认知模型。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 May 16;23(10):4791. doi: 10.3390/s23104791.

本文引用的文献

1
Q-Herilearn: Assessing heritage learning in digital environments. A mixed approach with factor and IRT models.Q-Herilearn:数字环境中的遗产学习评估。一种结合因素和IRT 模型的混合方法。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 29;19(3):e0299733. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299733. eCollection 2024.
2
Reporting standards for psychological network analyses in cross-sectional data.横断面数据中心理网络分析的报告标准。
Psychol Methods. 2023 Aug;28(4):806-824. doi: 10.1037/met0000471. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
3
Which estimation method to choose in network psychometrics? Deriving guidelines for applied researchers.
在网络心理测量学中应选择哪种估计方法?为应用研究人员制定指导方针。
Psychol Methods. 2023 Aug;28(4):925-946. doi: 10.1037/met0000439. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
4
A little garbage in, lots of garbage out: Assessing the impact of careless responding in personality survey data.一入调查深似海,数据垃圾全都来:评估人格调查数据中草率作答的影响。
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Dec;52(6):2489-2505. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01401-8.
5
Using network analysis to examine links between individual depressive symptoms, inflammatory markers, and covariates.利用网络分析研究个体抑郁症状、炎症标志物和协变量之间的联系。
Psychol Med. 2020 Dec;50(16):2682-2690. doi: 10.1017/S0033291719002770. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
6
What do centrality measures measure in psychological networks?中心度测度在心理网络中衡量什么?
J Abnorm Psychol. 2019 Nov;128(8):892-903. doi: 10.1037/abn0000446. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
7
A tutorial on regularized partial correlation networks.正则化偏相关网络教程。
Psychol Methods. 2018 Dec;23(4):617-634. doi: 10.1037/met0000167. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
8
How well do network models predict observations? On the importance of predictability in network models.网络模型的预测效果如何?关于网络模型中可预测性的重要性。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Apr;50(2):853-861. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0910-x.
9
How predictable are symptoms in psychopathological networks? A reanalysis of 18 published datasets.精神病理网络中的症状可预测性如何?对 18 个已发表数据集的再分析。
Psychol Med. 2017 Dec;47(16):2767-2776. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717001258. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
10
Exploratory graph analysis: A new approach for estimating the number of dimensions in psychological research.探索性图形分析:一种估计心理学研究维度数量的新方法。
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 8;12(6):e0174035. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174035. eCollection 2017.