Crawshaw Paul, Gray Joanne, Haighton Catherine, Lloyd Scott
Public Policy, Teesside University, UK.
Health Economics, Northumbria University, UK.
Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2024 Oct 24;8:100555. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100555. eCollection 2024 Dec.
Tackling health inequalities demands whole systems strategies with reach beyond the traditional sphere of influence of health care systems. Practitioners and researchers have long recognised that wider social determinants, where people are born, the communities they live in, their built environment, access to education and resources and, most significantly for this discussion, their relationship to the labour market, profoundly shape health experiences and expectations over the lifecourse. At macro-level, economic structures and systems play a fundamental role in the distribution of good health and incidence of inequalities. Regionally, the health of local labour markets, a phenomenon shaped by macro, national and global economic forces, is a powerful determinant of opportunities to access and remain in work. Simultaneously, health status impacts significantly on ability to participate in paid employment. Absence from the labour market is both a and of health inequalities. Economic inactivity, where people are both not participating in the labour market, or actively seeking or available for work, is strongly correlated with poor health. In the UK, over one third of the economically inactive experience long-term health problems. The implications for health inequalities, as both cause and symptom are clear. Participation in paid work, where appropriate, can be beneficial both economically and for health and wellbeing. Continued absence from the labour market is directly correlated with ill health. The determinants of health-related economic inactivity are complex and can only be understood using ecological models of public health. This presents significant challenges for politicians and policymakers alike concerned with reducing economic inactivity, delivering economic growth and redressing regional disparities.
解决健康不平等问题需要采取超越医疗保健系统传统影响范围的全系统战略。从业者和研究人员早就认识到,更广泛的社会决定因素,如人们的出生地、居住的社区、所处的建筑环境、获得教育和资源的机会,以及在本讨论中最重要的,他们与劳动力市场的关系,在很大程度上塑造了人们一生中的健康体验和期望。在宏观层面,经济结构和体系在良好健康的分配和不平等的发生率方面发挥着根本性作用。在区域层面,当地劳动力市场的健康状况,这一由宏观、国家和全球经济力量塑造的现象,是获得和维持工作机会的有力决定因素。同时,健康状况对参与有偿就业的能力有重大影响。脱离劳动力市场既是健康不平等的一个因素,也是其一种表现。经济不活跃,即人们既不参与劳动力市场,也不积极寻找工作或可供工作,与健康状况不佳密切相关。在英国,超过三分之一的经济不活跃者经历长期健康问题。健康不平等的成因和症状的影响显而易见。在适当情况下参与有偿工作在经济上以及对健康和福祉都可能有益。持续脱离劳动力市场与健康不佳直接相关。与健康相关的经济不活跃的决定因素很复杂,只有使用公共卫生的生态模型才能理解。这给关心减少经济不活跃、实现经济增长和纠正地区差距的政治家和政策制定者都带来了重大挑战。