Marina Ritchie, MS, UC Irvine Institute for Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders (UCI MIND), 3230 Biological Sciences III, University of California, Irvine, Email:
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2024;11(6):1563-1571. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2024.157.
Many cognitively unimpaired older adults are interested in learning their Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarker status, but little is known about motivations to undergo biomarker testing and result disclosure in the setting of preclinical AD trials.
Examine whether motivations to undergo AD biomarker testing and disclosure differ for individuals who have elevated amyloid compared to those with not elevated amyloid, and whether disclosure of amyloid results impacts participants' motivations.
DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: We conducted post-hoc analyses using data from the EARLY study, a preclinical AD trial of the beta-secretase inhibitor atabecestat. As part of the screening process of the trial, participants underwent biomarker testing and disclosure. We analyzed data from n=2241 participants.
We analyzed data from the Views and Perceptions of Amyloid Imaging (VPAI), a 9-item questionnaire assessing how strongly participants agreed with motivating factors for undergoing amyloid testing. The VPAI was administered at the first screening visit and again after amyloid disclosure.
Prior to amyloid disclosure, a greater proportion of participants in the elevated amyloid group responded at the two highest levels of endorsement for the items, "to confirm the feeling that I might already be developing symptoms of AD dementia" (p<0.001) and "to prepare my family for my possible illness in the future" (p=0.008), compared to participants in the not elevated amyloid group. Following disclosure, the not elevated amyloid group had higher odds of positive change in categorical VPAI item level scores for the items "to put mind at ease" (OR: 0.54; p<0.001), "to confirm the feeling that I might already be developing symptoms of AD dementia" (OR: 0.79; p=0.049), and "to prepare my family for my possible illness in the future" (OR: 0.67; p=<0.001), while the elevated amyloid group had higher odds of positive change for the item "curiosity" (OR:1.32; p=0.014).
Investigators might consider adjusting recruitment strategies for future trials to align with the motivations to undergo biomarker testing and disclosure most strongly endorsed by participants with elevated amyloid.
许多认知正常的老年人有兴趣了解自己的阿尔茨海默病(AD)生物标志物状况,但在临床前 AD 试验中,人们对接受 AD 生物标志物检测和结果披露的动机知之甚少。
检查与未升高淀粉样蛋白的个体相比,淀粉样蛋白升高的个体接受 AD 生物标志物检测和披露的动机是否不同,以及淀粉样蛋白结果的披露是否会影响参与者的动机。
设计、地点、参与者:我们使用来自早期研究的事后分析数据,这是一种针对β-分泌酶抑制剂 atabecestat 的临床前 AD 试验。作为试验筛选过程的一部分,参与者接受了生物标志物检测和披露。我们分析了 n=2241 名参与者的数据。
我们分析了来自观点和看法淀粉样蛋白成像(VPAI)的数据,这是一个 9 项的问卷,评估参与者对接受淀粉样蛋白检测的动机因素的强烈程度。VPAI 在第一次筛选访问时进行,并在淀粉样蛋白披露后再次进行。
在淀粉样蛋白披露之前,与淀粉样蛋白未升高的组相比,更多的淀粉样蛋白升高组的参与者对以下项目的两个最高水平的认可做出了回应:“确认我可能已经出现 AD 痴呆症状的感觉”(p<0.001)和“为我未来可能的疾病做好家人的准备”(p=0.008)。在披露之后,淀粉样蛋白未升高的组在“使心情放松”(OR:0.54;p<0.001)、“确认我可能已经出现 AD 痴呆症状的感觉”(OR:0.79;p=0.049)和“为我未来可能的疾病做好家人的准备”(OR:0.67;p<0.001)等项目的 VPAI 项目水平评分的正向变化方面,具有更高的可能性,而淀粉样蛋白升高的组在“好奇心”(OR:1.32;p=0.014)方面具有更高的正向变化可能性。
研究人员可能会考虑调整未来试验的招募策略,以与淀粉样蛋白升高的参与者最强烈支持的接受生物标志物检测和披露的动机保持一致。