Şengül Halil, Aydın Sabahattin, Önder Emrah, Bulut Arzu
Department of Health Management, Istanbul Sabahattin Zaim University, Turkiye.
Department of Health Management, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkiye.
Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2024 Nov 1;27(6):695-705. doi: 10.4103/aian.aian_1084_23. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
It is possible to evaluate health services for stroke patients based on clinical benefits. However, in recent years, questions about responsiveness and outcomes have also emerged. Currently, there is no index that can assess health-care services for stroke patients along these three dimensions. This study introduces the first index designed to measure the value generated by health-care services for stroke patients.
The Case-Mix Variables Data Collection Reference Guide, developed through a review of national and international stroke guidelines, underwent content validation by 10 neurologists and 10 interventional radiologists. Questions with a content validity index exceeding 0.80, along with the World Health Organization responsiveness questionnaire and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global-10 short form, were subjected to pairwise comparison by two neurologists, two interventional radiologists, and two public health physicians using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method.
In the comprehensive ranking of questions formulated using the AHP method and assessed by experts for importance and global weights, new stroke follow-up emerged as the most crucial, garnering an index score of 0.09. Conversely, questioning patients about their alcohol use status was deemed the least significant by experts, registering an index score of 0.00021.
Our AHP analyses have furnished an index for gauging the factors that contribute to the value of health-care services rendered to stroke patients.
基于临床效益评估中风患者的医疗服务是可行的。然而,近年来,关于反应性和结果的问题也出现了。目前,尚无一个指标能够从这三个维度评估中风患者的医疗服务。本研究引入了首个旨在衡量中风患者医疗服务所产生价值的指标。
通过回顾国内外中风指南制定的病例组合变量数据收集参考指南,由10名神经科医生和10名介入放射科医生进行内容效度验证。内容效度指数超过0.80的问题,连同世界卫生组织反应性问卷和患者报告结局测量信息系统简表全球10项,由两名神经科医生、两名介入放射科医生和两名公共卫生医生使用层次分析法(AHP)进行两两比较。
在使用AHP方法制定并经专家评估重要性和全局权重的问题综合排名中,新的中风随访被认为是最关键的,指数得分为0.09。相反,询问患者饮酒状况被专家认为是最不重要的,指数得分为0.00021。
我们的AHP分析提供了一个指标,用于衡量对中风患者提供的医疗服务价值有贡献的因素。