Miller Andrew G, Burr Katlyn L, Emberger John S, Hinkson Carl R, Hoerr Cheryl A, Juby Jerin, Roberts Karsten J, Smith Brian J, Strickland Shawna L, Rehder Kyle J
Mr. Miller is affiliated with Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; and Respiratory Care Services, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Ms. Burr is affiliated with Respiratory Care, Nemours Children's Health, Wilmington, Delaware.
Respir Care. 2025 Mar;70(3):287-297. doi: 10.4187/respcare.12144. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
Respiratory care departments are experiencing an increased need to demonstrate value in the care they deliver. Value efficiency is a concept that incorporates the value of individual treatments into the normal operations of a department. The purpose of this study was to describe respiratory care leaders' attitudes about the value of services provided by respiratory care departments. An electronic survey was distributed via social media, professional networks, and a manager work group. The survey was targeted to directors, managers, and supervisors of respiratory care departments. We asked questions related to value, services, and barriers to implementation of value efficiency. Data analysis was descriptive. We received 116 responses; 86% were from managers or directors. The 5 most valuable services delivered were invasive mechanical ventilation (82%), noninvasive ventilation or CPAP (71%), protocol-driven care (47%), code team (44%), and rapid response team (41%). The 5 least valuable services delivered by respiratory care departments were electrocardiograms (63%), stress testing (44%), lung expansion therapies (41%), sleep studies staffed by the respiratory care department (36%), and smoking cessation education (36%). The primary barrier to value efficiency was physician prescribing practices (68%). There was general agreement that physicians support respiratory therapy protocols (71%), value should be considered when evaluating respiratory care services (95%), and directing resources to more valuable services if possible (73%). Respondents did not agree that hospital administrators understand respiratory therapy workflow and full-time equivalent needs (35%) nor that hospital administrators would be supportive if we reduced services (18%). In a small sample of respiratory therapy leaders, there was limited consensus on what respiratory care services are the most and least valuable. Lack of consensus on high- and low-value services and physician prescribing practice were the primary barriers to value efficiency. Nearly all respondents felt value should be considered when evaluating respiratory care services.
呼吸护理部门越来越需要证明其提供的护理的价值。价值效率是一个将个体治疗的价值纳入部门日常运营的概念。本研究的目的是描述呼吸护理领导者对呼吸护理部门提供的服务价值的态度。通过社交媒体、专业网络和一个经理工作小组分发了一份电子调查问卷。该调查针对呼吸护理部门的主任、经理和主管。我们询问了与价值、服务以及价值效率实施障碍相关的问题。数据分析采用描述性方法。我们收到了116份回复;86%来自经理或主任。提供的5项最有价值的服务是有创机械通气(82%)、无创通气或持续气道正压通气(71%)、方案驱动护理(47%)、代码团队(44%)和快速反应团队(41%)。呼吸护理部门提供的5项最没有价值的服务是心电图检查(63%)、压力测试(44%)、肺扩张治疗(41%)、由呼吸护理部门配备人员的睡眠研究(36%)和戒烟教育(36%)。价值效率的主要障碍是医生的处方习惯(68%)。普遍认为医生支持呼吸治疗方案(71%)、在评估呼吸护理服务时应考虑价值(95%)以及尽可能将资源导向更有价值的服务(73%)。受访者不同意医院管理人员了解呼吸治疗工作流程和全职等效需求(35%),也不同意如果我们减少服务医院管理人员会给予支持(18%)。在一小部分呼吸治疗领导者样本中,对于哪些呼吸护理服务最有价值和最没有价值的共识有限。对高价值和低价值服务缺乏共识以及医生的处方习惯是价值效率的主要障碍。几乎所有受访者都认为在评估呼吸护理服务时应考虑价值。