Phoophiboon Vorakamol, Rodrigues Antenor, Vieira Fernando, Ko Matthew, Madotto Fabiana, Schreiber Annia, Sun Nannan, Sousa Mayson L A, Docci Mattia, Brault Clement, Menga Luca S, Telias Irene, Piraino Thomas, Goligher Ewan C, Brochard Laurent
Unity Health Toronto, Keenan Centre for Biomedical Research, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, 209 Victoria Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 1T8, Canada.
Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Crit Care. 2025 Jan 7;29(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05243-0.
Predicting complete liberation from mechanical ventilation (MV) is still challenging. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) offers a non-invasive measure of regional ventilation distribution and could bring additional information.
Whether the display of regional ventilation distribution during a Spontaneous Breathing Trial (SBT) could help at predicting early and successful liberation from MV.
Patients were monitored with EIT during the SBT. The tidal image was divided into ventral and dorsal regions and displayed simultaneously. We explored the ventral-to-dorsal ventilation difference in percentage, and its association with clinical outcomes. Liberation success was defined pragmatically as passing SBT followed by extubation within 24 h without reintubation for 7 days. Failure included use of rescue therapy, reintubation within 7 days, tracheostomy, and not being extubated within 24 h after succesful SBT. A training cohort was used for discovery, followed by a validation cohort.
Among a total of 98 patients analyzed, 85 passed SBT (87%), but rapid liberation success occurred only in 40; 13.5% of extubated patients required reintubation. From the first minutes to the entire SBT duration, the absolute ventral-to-dorsal difference was consistently smaller in liberation success compared to all subgroups of failure (p < 0.0001). An absolute difference at 5 min of SBT > 20% was associated with failure of liberation, with sensitivity and specificity of 71% and 78% and positive predictive value 81% in a validation cohort.
During SBT, a large ventral-to-dorsal difference in ventilation indicated by EIT may help to rapidly identify patients at risk of liberation failure.
预测机械通气(MV)的完全撤机仍具有挑战性。电阻抗断层成像(EIT)可提供区域通气分布的非侵入性测量,并可能带来额外信息。
自主呼吸试验(SBT)期间区域通气分布的显示是否有助于预测MV的早期成功撤机。
在SBT期间用EIT监测患者。将潮气图像分为腹侧和背侧区域并同时显示。我们探讨了腹侧与背侧通气差异的百分比及其与临床结局的关联。撤机成功被实际定义为通过SBT,随后在24小时内拔管且7天内无需再次插管。失败包括使用抢救治疗、7天内再次插管、气管切开以及在成功的SBT后24小时内未拔管。一个训练队列用于探索,随后是一个验证队列。
在总共分析的98例患者中,85例通过了SBT(87%),但仅40例快速成功撤机;13.5%的拔管患者需要再次插管。从最初几分钟到整个SBT持续时间,与所有失败亚组相比,成功撤机时腹侧与背侧的绝对差异始终较小(p<0.0001)。SBT 5分钟时绝对差异>20%与撤机失败相关,在验证队列中的敏感性和特异性分别为71%和78%,阳性预测值为81%。
在SBT期间,EIT显示的腹侧与背侧通气差异较大可能有助于快速识别有撤机失败风险的患者。