Suppr超能文献

肱骨近端骨折微创外固定是否提供足够的稳定性?一项体外生物力学研究。

Does minimally invasive external fixation of proximal humerus fractures provide adequate stability? A biomechanical in vitro study.

机构信息

Institute for Biomechanics, BG Unfallklinik Murnau Professor Küntscher Str. 8, 82418, Murnau, Germany.

Department of Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery, BG Unfallklinik Murnau, Murnau, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Oct 29;25(1):859. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07977-y.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Proximal humerus fractures are usually treated with rigid angle-stable plates or nails. As an alternative, semi-rigid, minimally invasive systems have been developed for supportive fixation. A new system uses this principle with 2.5 mm partially threaded pins and external fixation.

AIM

This study aimed to compare the fracture stability of the fixator with an angular stable plate about whether the mechanical stability is sufficient for early postoperative mobilisation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Human proximal humeri (paired, female, age ≥ 60, n = 8) were cut to a 3-part fracture and treated with an external fixator (Galaxy Shoulder, Orthofix) or an angular stable plate (Philos, DePuy Synthes). A physiological load was simulated in vitro based on a 45° abduction motion. The load level was continuously increased from 10 to 320 N within 10,000 cycles simulating the loads during rehabilitation. This was followed by another 10,000 cycles at 320 N for fatigue testing. Fracture motion was recorded with a 3D camera. Fracture stability was evaluated at a partial load of 160 N and 240 N (simulating loads during early mobilisation).

RESULTS

The fracture motion at the lateral aspect was significantly (p < 0.034) larger for the fixator compared to the plate both for axial and for shear movements, while at the medial aspects fracture motions were similar. Both fixation systems adequately stabilized the lateral tubercle fragment with no significant differences between fixation techniques. The migration of the fixator pins (1.1 ± 1.0 mm) and valgus rotation of the head fragment were minimal (3.1 ± 2.0°). The maximum load level of 320 N was reached by all plate constructs and 3 fixator constructs.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that the external fixator system allows early but gentle postoperative mobilisation. More aggressive rehabilitation measures should be postponed after the healing of the fracture.

摘要

简介

肱骨近端骨折通常采用刚性角度稳定板或钉进行治疗。作为替代方案,已经开发出了半刚性、微创系统来进行支撑固定。一种新系统使用带有 2.5 毫米部分螺纹钉和外部固定的原理。

目的

本研究旨在比较固定器和角度稳定板的骨折稳定性,以确定机械稳定性是否足以进行早期术后活动。

材料和方法

将人类肱骨近端(配对,女性,年龄≥60 岁,n=8)切割成 3 部分骨折,并分别使用外固定器(Galaxy Shoulder,Orthofix)或角度稳定板(Philos,DePuy Synthes)进行治疗。体外基于 45°外展运动模拟生理负荷。在 10,000 次循环内,将负荷水平从 10 增加到 320 N,模拟康复期间的负荷。然后在 320 N 下进行另外 10,000 次循环疲劳测试。使用 3D 相机记录骨折运动。在部分负荷 160 N 和 240 N 下评估骨折稳定性(模拟早期活动期间的负荷)。

结果

在轴向和剪切运动方面,与钢板相比,固定器的外侧骨折运动明显更大(p<0.034),而内侧骨折运动相似。两种固定系统均能充分稳定外侧结节碎片,固定技术之间无显著差异。固定器钉的迁移(1.1±1.0 毫米)和头片段的外翻旋转很小(3.1±2.0°)。所有钢板结构和 3 个固定器结构均达到最大负荷水平 320 N。

结论

我们的结果表明,外固定器系统允许早期但温和的术后活动。应在骨折愈合后推迟更积极的康复措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/428e/11577648/1b6e87ae3567/12891_2024_7977_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验