Barthelemy Benjamin, Ravé Guillaume, Govindasamy Karuppasamy, Ali Ajmol, Coso Juan Del, Demeaux Julien, Bideau Benoit, Zouha Hassanel
Movement, Sport, Health and Sciences laboratory (M2S), UFR-STAPS, University of Rennes 2-ENS Cachan, Rennes Cedex, France.
Toulouse Football Club, Toulouse, France.
J Hum Kinet. 2024 Jul 17;94:203-214. doi: 10.5114/jhk/185933. eCollection 2024 Oct.
Match outcomes and championship rankings are the consequence of the team's technical, tactical, and physical variables. This study aimed to compare physical and modern technical-tactical performance variables between matches with different outcomes for a professional soccer team. Total distance covered, distance covered between 20.0 and 25.0 km/h and at > 25.0 km/h, distance covered at ≥ 3 m/s and at ≤ -3 m·s along with several modern technical-tactical variables (expected goals in favor (xG) and against (xGA), expected goals chain in favor (xGC) and against (xGCA) and passes per defensive action (PPDA)) were collected for 71 soccer matches during the 2020/2021 and 2021/2022 seasons from a team competing in the French Ligue 2. These technical-tactical and running performance variables were obtained by a validated video tracking system (OPTA) and their values per match were compared depending on the match outcome which was categorized as "loss" (L), "draw" (D) or "win" (W). No significant differences were observed for the different running metrics depending on the match outcome. However, significant differences were observed for xGA (0.70 ± 0.39 vs. 1.24 ± 0.59; p= 0.004) and xGCA (5.38 ± 2.78 vs. 10.92 ± 6.18; p = 0.002) between wins and losses, respectively. Additionally, there was a weak, but significant correlation between xGCA and distance covered in acceleration (r = 0.255; p = 0.032) and deceleration (r = 0.237; p = 0.047). In conclusion, while our study found associations between technical-tactical variables and match outcomes, causality cannot be inferred. Improved technical-tactical performance may positively impact the match result, especially by the reduction of the opposing team's goal expectancy. On the contrary, running performance variables showed no associations with the match outcome.
比赛结果和锦标赛排名是球队技术、战术和身体变量的结果。本研究旨在比较一支职业足球队在不同比赛结果的比赛中身体和现代技术战术表现变量。记录了2020/2021和2021/2022赛季法国乙级联赛一支球队71场足球比赛的总跑动距离、20.0至25.0公里/小时以及大于25.0公里/小时的跑动距离、≥3米/秒和≤ -3米/秒的跑动距离,以及几个现代技术战术变量(预期进球数(xG)、预期失球数(xGA)、预期进球链(xGC)、预期失球链(xGCA)和每防守动作传球数(PPDA))。这些技术战术和跑动表现变量通过经过验证的视频跟踪系统(OPTA)获得,并根据比赛结果(分为“输”(L)、“平”(D)或“赢”(W))比较每场比赛的值。根据比赛结果,不同的跑动指标没有观察到显著差异。然而,分别在赢球和输球之间,xGA(0.70±0.39对1.24±0.59;p = 0.004)和xGCA(5.38±2.78对10.92±6.18;p = 0.002)观察到显著差异。此外,xGCA与加速跑动距离(r = 0.255;p = 0.032)和减速跑动距离(r = 0.237;p = 0.047)之间存在微弱但显著的相关性。总之,虽然我们的研究发现了技术战术变量与比赛结果之间的关联,但不能推断出因果关系。提高技术战术表现可能会对比赛结果产生积极影响,特别是通过降低对手的进球预期。相反,跑动表现变量与比赛结果没有关联。