文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Impact of Language Barriers and Age on English Hearing Test App Accuracy for Polish Users.

作者信息

Pastucha Małgorzata, Gos Elżbieta, Skarżyński Henryk, Jedrzejczak W Wiktor

机构信息

Department of Experimental Audiology Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, World Hearing Center Warsaw Poland.

Department of Otorhinolaryngo surgery Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, World Hearing Center Warsaw Poland.

出版信息

OTO Open. 2024 Nov 19;8(4):e70047. doi: 10.1002/oto2.70047. eCollection 2024 Oct-Dec.


DOI:10.1002/oto2.70047
PMID:39563995
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11574669/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The development of health applications (apps) includes those for testing hearing, although most of them are available only in English. This study investigates whether poor English language proficiency creates a barrier for Polish users in the accuracy of such an app in measuring self-determined hearing thresholds. STUDY DESIGN: The study compared hearing thresholds measured by an English-language app and a professionally conducted reference test, with attention to participants' English proficiency and age. SETTING: The English-language app "Hearing test, Audiogram," was used to determine hearing thresholds. A reference test was performed by an audiologist using specialized equipment. METHODS: Participants were 87 nonnative English language speakers aged 16 to 88. They were divided into 3 groups based on their proficiency in English: no knowledge (Group 1), basic (Group 2), and advanced (Group 3). The mean differences between hearing thresholds determined using the app and the reference tests were measured for each group. RESULTS: The accuracy of the results varied according to the level of English proficiency. A statistically significant difference was found between Group 1 (no knowledge) and Group 3 (advanced), with mean differences of 13.6, 9.3, and 6.7 dB for Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively, meaning that discrepancies were larger in the less proficient groups. However, when participant age was considered, language proficiency was less important and was no longer a significant factor. CONCLUSION: This study revealed that English language proficiency does affect the accuracy of mobile app-based hearing tests, but age of the user is also important.

摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb99/11574669/4beaa27d4365/OTO2-8-e70047-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb99/11574669/4beaa27d4365/OTO2-8-e70047-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb99/11574669/4beaa27d4365/OTO2-8-e70047-g001.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Impact of Language Barriers and Age on English Hearing Test App Accuracy for Polish Users.

OTO Open. 2024-11-19

[2]
Usability of a Mobile App for Improving Literacy in Children With Hearing Impairment: Focus Group Study.

JMIR Hum Factors. 2020-5-28

[3]
Effective German and English Language mHealth Apps for Self-management of Bronchial Asthma in Children and Adolescents: Comparison Study.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021-5-19

[4]
Worldwide Prevalence of Hearing Loss Among Smartphone Users: Cross-Sectional Study Using a Mobile-Based App.

J Med Internet Res. 2020-7-23

[5]
Smartphone-Facilitated In-Situ Hearing Aid Audiometry for Community-Based Hearing Testing.

Ear Hear.

[6]
The relationship between high-frequency pure-tone hearing loss, hearing in noise test (HINT) thresholds, and the articulation index.

J Am Acad Audiol. 2012

[7]
Native and Non-native Speech Perception by Hearing-Impaired Listeners in Noise- and Speech Maskers.

Trends Hear. 2015-4-24

[8]
Malay Version of the mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (M-MAUQ): Translation, Adaptation, and Validation Study.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021-2-4

[9]
Understanding ethnic inequalities in hearing health in the UK: a cross-sectional study of the link between language proficiency and performance on the Digit Triplet Test.

BMJ Open. 2020-12-8

[10]
Tools for telehealth: A correlational analysis of app-based hearing testing.

Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2024-5-9

本文引用的文献

[1]
Accuracy and Pitfalls in the Smartphone-Based Audiometry Examination.

Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2024-3

[2]
Mobile audiometry for hearing threshold assessment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Clin Otolaryngol. 2024-1

[3]
Usability, acceptability and clinical utility of a mobile app to screen for hearing loss in older adults in a geriatric rehabilitation hospital.

J Eval Clin Pract. 2023-3

[4]
Web- and app-based tools for remote hearing assessment: a scoping review.

Int J Audiol. 2023-8

[5]
Can We Use Commercial Mobile Apps Instead of Research Mobile Apps in Healthcare Research?

Front Public Health. 2021-7-23

[6]
Smartphone-Based Applications to Detect Hearing Loss: A Review of Current Technology.

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021-2

[7]
A Smartphone-Based Approach to Screening for Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Cross-Sectional Validity Study.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020-11-11

[8]
Accuracy and Reliability of Smartphone Self-Test Audiometry in Community Clinics in Low Income Settings: A Comparative Study.

Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2020-6

[9]
A Smartphone National Hearing Test: Performance and Characteristics of Users.

Am J Audiol. 2018-11-19

[10]
Validation of a portable hearing assessment tool: Agilis Health Mobile Audiogram.

Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2018-10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索