• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

如何减轻新冠疫情调查中的选择偏差:来自五个全国队列的证据。

How to mitigate selection bias in COVID-19 surveys: evidence from five national cohorts.

作者信息

Narayanan Martina K, Dodgeon Brian, Katsoulis Michail, Ploubidis George B, Silverwood Richard J

机构信息

Centre for Longitudinal Studies, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, London, UK.

MRC Unit for Lifelong Health & Ageing, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Epidemiol. 2024 Nov;39(11):1221-1227. doi: 10.1007/s10654-024-01164-y. Epub 2024 Nov 20.

DOI:10.1007/s10654-024-01164-y
PMID:39565535
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11646265/
Abstract

Non-response to surveys is a common problem; even more so during the COVID-19 pandemic with social distancing measures challenging data collection. As respondents often differ from non-respondents, this can introduce bias. The goal of the current study was to see if we can reduce bias and restore sample representativeness in a series of COVID-19 surveys embedded within five UK cohort studies by using the rich data available from previous waves of data collection. Three surveys were conducted during the pandemic across five UK cohorts: National Survey of Health and Development (NSHD, born 1946), 1958 National Child Development Study (NCDS), 1970 British Cohort Study (BCS70), Next Steps (born 1989-90) and Millennium Cohort Study (MCS, born 2000-02). Response rates in the COVID-19 surveys were lower compared to previous waves, especially in the younger cohorts. We identified bias due to systematic non-response in several variables, with more respondents in the most advantaged social class and among those with higher childhood cognitive ability. Making use of the rich data available pre-pandemic in these longitudinal studies, the application of non-response weights and multiple imputation was successful in reducing bias in parental social class and childhood cognitive ability, nearly eliminating it for the former. Surveys embedded within existing cohort studies offer a clear advantage over cross-sectional samples collected during the pandemic in terms of their ability to mitigate selection bias. This will enhance the quality and reliability of future research studying the medium and long-term effects of the pandemic.

摘要

调查无回应是一个常见问题;在新冠疫情期间更是如此,社交距离措施给数据收集带来了挑战。由于回应者往往与无回应者存在差异,这可能会引入偏差。本研究的目的是探讨能否通过利用此前几轮数据收集所获得的丰富数据,在英国五项队列研究中嵌入的一系列新冠疫情调查中减少偏差并恢复样本代表性。在疫情期间对英国五项队列进行了三项调查:全国健康与发展调查(NSHD,出生于1946年)、1958年全国儿童发展研究(NCDS)、1970年英国队列研究(BCS70)、下一步调查(出生于1989 - 90年)以及千禧队列研究(MCS,出生于2000 - 02年)。与之前几轮相比,新冠疫情调查的回应率较低,尤其是在较年轻的队列中。我们在几个变量中发现了因系统性无回应导致的偏差,最具优势社会阶层以及童年认知能力较高的人群中有更多回应者。利用这些纵向研究中疫情前可得的丰富数据,应用无回应权重和多重插补成功减少了父母社会阶层和童年认知能力方面的偏差,对于前者几乎消除了偏差。在减轻选择偏差的能力方面,嵌入现有队列研究中的调查比疫情期间收集的横断面样本具有明显优势。这将提高研究疫情中长期影响的未来研究的质量和可靠性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1554/11646265/70fb13a9c2fe/10654_2024_1164_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1554/11646265/92e4ddce9ab4/10654_2024_1164_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1554/11646265/70fb13a9c2fe/10654_2024_1164_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1554/11646265/92e4ddce9ab4/10654_2024_1164_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1554/11646265/70fb13a9c2fe/10654_2024_1164_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
How to mitigate selection bias in COVID-19 surveys: evidence from five national cohorts.如何减轻新冠疫情调查中的选择偏差:来自五个全国队列的证据。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2024 Nov;39(11):1221-1227. doi: 10.1007/s10654-024-01164-y. Epub 2024 Nov 20.
2
Long-term psychological distress trajectories and the COVID-19 pandemic in three British birth cohorts: A multi-cohort study.长期心理困扰轨迹与三个人群队列中的 COVID-19 大流行:一项多人群队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2023 Apr 4;20(4):e1004145. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004145. eCollection 2023 Apr.
3
Cohort profile: The UK COVID-19 Public Experiences (COPE) prospective longitudinal mixed-methods study of health and well-being during the SARSCoV2 coronavirus pandemic.队列简介:英国新冠疫情公众体验(COPE)研究,这是一项关于严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)大流行期间健康与福祉的前瞻性纵向混合方法研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 13;16(10):e0258484. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258484. eCollection 2021.
4
Using linked administrative data to aid the handling of non-response and restore sample representativeness in cohort studies: the 1958 national child development study and hospital episode statistics data.利用关联的行政数据来帮助处理无应答并恢复队列研究中样本的代表性:1958 年全国儿童发展研究和医院入院统计数据。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Nov 11;23(1):266. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-02099-w.
5
Associations between different measures of SARS-CoV-2 infection status and subsequent economic inactivity: A pooled analysis of five longitudinal surveys linked to healthcare records.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染状况的不同衡量指标与随后的经济不活动之间的关联:一项与医疗记录相关的五项纵向调查的汇总分析。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 9;20(4):e0321201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321201. eCollection 2025.
6
Socioeconomic inequalities in childhood and adolescent body-mass index, weight, and height from 1953 to 2015: an analysis of four longitudinal, observational, British birth cohort studies.1953 年至 2015 年期间儿童和青少年身体质量指数、体重和身高的社会经济不平等:四项英国纵向观察性出生队列研究的分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2018 Apr;3(4):e194-e203. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(18)30045-8. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
7
Intersecting factors of disadvantage and discrimination and their effect on daily life during the coronavirus pandemic: the CICADA-ME mixed-methods study.新冠疫情期间不利因素与歧视的交叉影响及其对日常生活的作用:CICADA-ME混合方法研究
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Feb;13(2):1-185. doi: 10.3310/KYTF4381.
8
Early perceptions and behavioural responses during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey of UK adults.新冠疫情期间的早期认知与行为反应:一项针对英国成年人的横断面调查
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 4;11(1):e043577. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043577.
9
Comparing Public Perceptions and Preventive Behaviors During the Early Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Hong Kong and the United Kingdom: Cross-sectional Survey Study.比较 COVID-19 大流行早期香港和英国的公众认知和预防行为:横断面调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 8;23(3):e23231. doi: 10.2196/23231.
10
SARS-CoV-2 infection in the first trimester and the risk of early miscarriage: a UK population-based prospective cohort study of 3041 pregnancies conceived during the pandemic.SARS-CoV-2 感染与早孕期流产风险:英国一项基于人群的前瞻性队列研究,纳入了 3041 例大流行期间妊娠的孕妇。
Hum Reprod. 2022 May 30;37(6):1126-1133. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac062.

本文引用的文献

1
A pilot dose-finding study of Terazosin in humans.特拉唑嗪在人体中的剂量探索性试验研究。
medRxiv. 2024 May 22:2024.05.22.24307622. doi: 10.1101/2024.05.22.24307622.
2
Missing at random assumption made more plausible: evidence from the 1958 British birth cohort.随机缺失假设更合理:来自 1958 年英国出生队列的证据。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Aug;136:44-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.019. Epub 2021 Feb 27.