• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparison of basic lymphocyte phenotype results between a diagnostic and a research laboratory.诊断实验室与研究实验室之间基础淋巴细胞表型结果的比较。
Lab Med. 2025 May 9;56(3):271-278. doi: 10.1093/labmed/lmae091.
2
Antiretroviral therapy (ART) for treating HIV infection in ART-eligible pregnant women.用于治疗符合抗逆转录病毒治疗条件的孕妇艾滋病毒感染的抗逆转录病毒疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Mar 17(3):CD008440. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008440.
3
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
4
Optimal monitoring strategies for guiding when to switch first-line antiretroviral therapy regimens for treatment failure in adults and adolescents living with HIV in low-resource settings.在资源匮乏地区,针对感染艾滋病毒的成人和青少年治疗失败时何时更换一线抗逆转录病毒治疗方案的最佳监测策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Apr 14(4):CD008494. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008494.
5
Antidepressants for depression in adults with HIV infection.用于感染HIV的成年抑郁症患者的抗抑郁药。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 22;1(1):CD008525. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008525.pub3.
6
Effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected children under 2 years of age.抗逆转录病毒疗法对2岁以下感染艾滋病毒儿童的疗效。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jul 11(7):CD004772. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004772.pub3.
7
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
8
Population-based interventions for reducing sexually transmitted infections, including HIV infection.基于人群的减少性传播感染(包括艾滋病毒感染)的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(2):CD001220. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001220.pub2.
9
Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断的快速、即时抗原检测。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 22;7(7):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub3.
10
Aerobic exercise interventions for adults living with HIV/AIDS.针对感染艾滋病毒/艾滋病的成年人的有氧运动干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18(2):CD001796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001796.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Why using a paired t test to assess agreement is problematic?
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021 Nov;160(5):767-768. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.07.001.
2
A Brief Chronicle of CD4 as a Biomarker for HIV/AIDS: A Tribute to the Memory of John L. Fahey.CD4作为HIV/AIDS生物标志物的简史:纪念约翰·L·费伊
For Immunopathol Dis Therap. 2015;6(1-2):55-64. doi: 10.1615/ForumImmunDisTher.2016014169.
3
Understanding Bland Altman analysis.理解布兰德-奥特曼分析。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2015 Jun 5;25(2):141-51. doi: 10.11613/BM.2015.015. eCollection 2015.
4
The multicenter AIDS Cohort Study, 1983 to ….多中心艾滋病队列研究,1983 年至……
Public Health. 2012 Mar;126(3):196-198. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2011.11.013. Epub 2011 Dec 27.
5
Limitations of the paired t-test for evaluation of method comparison data.
Clin Chem. 1999 Feb;45(2):314-5.
6
Plasma viral load and CD4+ lymphocytes as prognostic markers of HIV-1 infection.血浆病毒载量和CD4 +淋巴细胞作为HIV-1感染的预后标志物。
Ann Intern Med. 1997 Jun 15;126(12):946-54. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-126-12-199706150-00003.
7
Evaluation of method-comparison data.方法比较数据的评估。
Clin Chem. 1981 Jul;27(7):1311-2.
8
Simple and rapid measurement of human T lymphocytes and their subclasses in peripheral blood.外周血中人类T淋巴细胞及其亚群的简单快速检测
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Aug;77(8):4914-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.8.4914.
9
Enumeration of human lymphocyte subpopulations by immunofluorescence: a comparative study using automated flow microfluorometry and fluorescence microscopy.通过免疫荧光法对人类淋巴细胞亚群进行计数:一项使用自动流式微量荧光测定法和荧光显微镜的比较研究。
J Immunol Methods. 1983 Mar 25;58(3):337-47. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(83)90361-7.
10
Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.评估两种临床测量方法之间一致性的统计方法。
Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10.

诊断实验室与研究实验室之间基础淋巴细胞表型结果的比较。

Comparison of basic lymphocyte phenotype results between a diagnostic and a research laboratory.

作者信息

Aziz Najib, LaBelle Erik, Jamieson Beth D, Mimiaga Matthew J, Detels Roger

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, US.

Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, US.

出版信息

Lab Med. 2025 May 9;56(3):271-278. doi: 10.1093/labmed/lmae091.

DOI:10.1093/labmed/lmae091
PMID:39569985
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12064559/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Lymphocyte phenotyping is a valuable tool for monitoring the effects of antiretroviral therapy on individuals living with HIV-1. A switch study was conducted to compare T-cell subset quantification performed by a research laboratory and a diagnostic, laboratory to understand the impact on the retrospective and prospective results of a long-term study.

METHODS

Using FACSCanto II Flow Cytometers, EDTA anticoagulated peripheral blood from 73 males enrolled in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study/Women Interagency HIV Combined Cohort Study was analyzed by both a research (laboratory 1) and a diagnostics laboratory (laboratory 2) for quantification of cluster of differentiation (CD)3, CD4, and CD8 T-cells. There were 47 males living with and 26 living without HIV-1.

RESULTS

Bland-Altman (B-A) analysis was applied to assess the agreement between laboratory 1 and laboratory 2 results. There were 69 out of 73 CD3, 71 out of 73CD4, and 72 out of 73 CD8 T-cell results that fell within acceptable B-A limits of agreement. The mean differences between the 2 laboratories were -1.000, -0.945, and +0.685(%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The strong agreement between results from laboratory 1 and laboratory 2 for CD3, CD4, and CD8 T-cell percentage suggests that the difference between laboratories using the same instrumentation and methodology will have a minimal effect on long-term study results.

摘要

目的

淋巴细胞表型分析是监测抗逆转录病毒疗法对HIV-1感染者疗效的一项重要工具。开展了一项转换研究,以比较一个研究实验室和一个诊断实验室进行的T细胞亚群定量分析,从而了解其对一项长期研究的回顾性和前瞻性结果的影响。

方法

使用FACSCanto II流式细胞仪,由一个研究实验室(实验室1)和一个诊断实验室(实验室2)对参与多中心艾滋病队列研究/女性机构间HIV联合队列研究的73名男性的乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)抗凝外周血进行分析,以定量分化簇(CD)3、CD4和CD8 T细胞。其中47名男性感染了HIV-1,26名未感染。

结果

采用布兰德-奥特曼(B-A)分析评估实验室1和实验室2结果之间的一致性。73个CD3结果中有69个、73个CD4结果中有71个、73个CD8 T细胞结果中有72个落在可接受的B-A一致性界限内。两个实验室之间的平均差异分别为-1.000%、-0.945%和+0.685%。

结论

实验室1和实验室2在CD3、CD4和CD8 T细胞百分比结果上的高度一致性表明,使用相同仪器和方法的不同实验室之间的差异对长期研究结果的影响极小。