Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.
Division of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Nurs Open. 2024 Nov;11(11):e70101. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70101.
To investigate concurrent changes in short shift intervals (< 11 h) and workload among hospital employees.
This cohort study of 1904 employees in one hospital district in Finland utilised data on employees' working hours for short shift intervals and workload based on the patient classifications aggregated to a 3-week period level across 2 years, 2018-2019. The data was analysed by group-based trajectory modelling and multinominal regression models.
The seven trajectories model had the best fit to the data-Group 1: very few short shift intervals that are decreasing and low workload (15.0%); Group 2: a low amount of short shift intervals that are decreasing and stable low workload (14.2%); Group 3: moderate amount of short shift intervals that are slightly increasing and low workload (25.1%); Group 4: a low amount of short shift intervals that are slightly decreasing and stable low workload that is slightly increasing (12.1%): Group 5: a moderate amount of both short shift intervals and workload (19.8%): Group 6: short shift intervals that are clearly decreasing, with higher than the average workload decreasing (5.6%); Group 7: moderate amount of short shift intervals and very high workload (8.3%).
Only a minority of hospital employees were found to have both high workloads and insufficient recovery possibilities, but the time-related increases in objective workload were not compensated by better recovery possibilities in working hours. For shift scheduling, it is noteworthy that older employees might seek to work at units in which the workload is lower, which could be considered to support workability.
Record.
No Patient or Public Contribution.
调查医院员工短班间隔(<11 小时)和工作量的同时变化。
这项对芬兰一个医院区的 1904 名员工进行的队列研究,利用了 2018-2019 年两年间基于患者分类汇总到 3 周期间水平的员工短班间隔和工作量的工作时间数据。数据采用基于群组的轨迹建模和多项回归模型进行分析。
七轨迹模型最符合数据——组 1:短班间隔非常少且呈下降趋势,工作量低(15.0%);组 2:短班间隔数量低,呈下降趋势,工作量稳定较低(14.2%);组 3:中等数量的短班间隔,呈略微增加趋势,工作量低(25.1%);组 4:短班间隔数量低,呈略微下降趋势,工作量稳定略增,略微增加(12.1%):组 5:中等数量的短班间隔和工作量(19.8%);组 6:短班间隔明显减少,工作量高于平均水平下降(5.6%);组 7:中等数量的短班间隔和极高的工作量(8.3%)。
只有少数医院员工既工作量大又缺乏足够的恢复可能性,但客观工作量的时间相关增加并没有通过更好的工作时间恢复可能性得到补偿。在轮班安排方面,值得注意的是,年长的员工可能会寻求在工作量较低的单位工作,这可以被认为是支持工作能力的。
记录。
无患者或公众贡献。