a Finnish Institute of Occupational Health , Helsinki , Finland.
Ergonomics. 2013;56(11):1640-51. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2013.837514. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
We explored the relationship of job strain with working hours, shift-dependent perceived workload, sleepiness and recovery. Nurses/nursing assistants (n = 95) were recruited from wards that belonged to either the top (high-strain group, HJS) or the bottom (low-strain group, LJS) job strain quartiles of a Job Content Questionnaire survey of employees in five health care districts and four cities in Finland. Three-week field measurements during naturally occurring shift schedules and a subset of pre-selected shift arrangements consisted of the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale, perceived workload and recovery. The HJS group (n = 42) had more single days off and quick returns than the LJS group (n = 53, p < 0.01), and both mental workload and physical workload were rated as higher (p < 0.01). During naturally occurring shift arrangements, severe sleepiness was more common in the HJS group only in quick returns (p = 0.04) and the HJS group recovered on average more poorly from work after all shifts (p = 0.01) and morning shifts (p = 0.02). During pre-selected shift arrangements, the differences between the groups were only minor. In conclusion, job strain-related differences in sleepiness and recovery were mostly attributable to differences in shift arrangements.
我们探讨了工作压力与工作时间、轮班相关的感知工作量、困倦和恢复之间的关系。从芬兰五个医疗区和四个城市的员工工作内容问卷调查的前四个季度中,选择属于高工作压力组(HJS)和低工作压力组(LJS)的病房招募了护士/护理助理(n=95)。在自然轮班时间表和预先选择的轮班安排的三周现场测量中,使用了卡罗林斯卡困倦量表、感知工作量和恢复情况。HJS 组(n=42)比 LJS 组(n=53)有更多的单日休息和快速返回(p<0.01),并且心理工作量和体力工作量都被评为更高(p<0.01)。在自然轮班安排中,只有在快速返回时,HJS 组的严重困倦更为常见(p=0.04),并且 HJS 组在所有轮班(p=0.01)和早班(p=0.02)后平均恢复较差。在预先选择的轮班安排中,两组之间的差异仅较小。总之,与工作压力相关的困倦和恢复差异主要归因于轮班安排的差异。