• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用序列特征嵌入和正则化多核支持向量机对阿尔茨海默病前驱阶段进行多类分类。

Multiclass classification of Alzheimer's disease prodromal stages using sequential feature embeddings and regularized multikernel support vector machine.

作者信息

Olatunde Oyekanmi O, Oyetunde Kehinde S, Han Jihun, Khasawneh Mohammad T, Yoon Hyunsoo

机构信息

Department of Systems Science and Industrial Engineering, Binghamton University, NY 13902, USA.

Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, PR China.

出版信息

Neuroimage. 2024 Dec 15;304:120929. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120929. Epub 2024 Nov 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120929
PMID:39571644
Abstract

The detection of patients in the cognitive normal (CN), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and Alzheimer's disease (AD) stages of neurodegeneration is crucial for early treatment interventions. However, the heterogeneity of MCI data samples poses a challenge for CN vs. MCI vs. AD multiclass classification, as some samples are closer to AD while others are closer to CN in the feature space. Previous attempts to address this challenge produced inaccurate results, leading most frameworks to break the assessment into binary classification tasks such as AD vs. CN, AD vs. MCI, and CN vs. MCI. Other methods proposed sequential binary classifications such as CN vs. others and dividing others into AD vs. MCI. While those approaches may have yielded encouraging results, the sequential binary classification method makes interpretation and comparison with other frameworks challenging and subjective. Those frameworks exhibited varying accuracy scores for different binary tasks, making it unclear how to compare the model performance with other direct multiclass methods. Therefore, we introduce a classification framework comprising unsupervised ensemble manifold regularized sparse low-rank approximation and regularized multikernel support vector machine (SVM). This framework first extracts a joint feature embedding from MRI and PET neuroimaging features, which were then combined with the Apoe4, Adas11, MPACC digits, and Intracranial volume features using a regularized multikernel SVM. Using that framework, we achieved a state-of-the-art (SOTA) result in a CN vs. MCI vs. AD multiclass classification (mean accuracy: 84.87±6.09, F1 score: 84.83±6.12 vs 67.69). The methods generalize well to binary classification tasks, achieving SOTA results in all but the CN vs. MCI category, which was slightly lower than the best score by just 0.2%.

摘要

在神经退行性变的认知正常(CN)、轻度认知障碍(MCI)和阿尔茨海默病(AD)阶段检测患者对于早期治疗干预至关重要。然而,MCI数据样本的异质性给CN与MCI与AD的多类分类带来了挑战,因为在特征空间中一些样本更接近AD,而另一些则更接近CN。以往应对这一挑战的尝试结果不准确,导致大多数框架将评估分解为二元分类任务,如AD与CN、AD与MCI以及CN与MCI。其他方法提出了顺序二元分类,如CN与其他类别,以及将其他类别分为AD与MCI。虽然这些方法可能取得了令人鼓舞的结果,但顺序二元分类方法使得与其他框架的解释和比较具有挑战性且主观。这些框架在不同的二元任务中表现出不同的准确率得分,这使得不清楚如何将模型性能与其他直接的多类方法进行比较。因此,我们引入了一个分类框架,该框架包括无监督集成流形正则化稀疏低秩逼近和正则化多核支持向量机(SVM)。该框架首先从MRI和PET神经影像特征中提取联合特征嵌入,然后使用正则化多核SVM将其与Apoe4、Adas11、MPACC数字和颅内体积特征相结合。使用该框架,我们在CN与MCI与AD的多类分类中取得了领先水平(SOTA)的结果(平均准确率:84.87±6.09,F1分数:84.83±6.12对67.69)。这些方法在二元分类任务中具有良好的泛化能力,除了CN与MCI类别外,在所有类别中都取得了SOTA结果,该类别略低于最佳分数仅0.2%。

相似文献

1
Multiclass classification of Alzheimer's disease prodromal stages using sequential feature embeddings and regularized multikernel support vector machine.使用序列特征嵌入和正则化多核支持向量机对阿尔茨海默病前驱阶段进行多类分类。
Neuroimage. 2024 Dec 15;304:120929. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120929. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
2
Ensemble of random forests One vs. Rest classifiers for MCI and AD prediction using ANOVA cortical and subcortical feature selection and partial least squares.基于 ANOVA 皮质和皮质下特征选择和偏最小二乘法的随机森林与 One vs. Rest 分类器集成用于 MCI 和 AD 预测。
J Neurosci Methods. 2018 May 15;302:47-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2017.12.005. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
3
Label-aligned multi-task feature learning for multimodal classification of Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment.用于阿尔茨海默病和轻度认知障碍多模态分类的标签对齐多任务特征学习
Brain Imaging Behav. 2016 Dec;10(4):1148-1159. doi: 10.1007/s11682-015-9480-7.
4
Discriminative Sparse Features for Alzheimer's Disease Diagnosis Using Multimodal Image Data.使用多模态图像数据的阿尔茨海默病诊断的判别性稀疏特征
Curr Alzheimer Res. 2018;15(1):67-79. doi: 10.2174/1567205014666170922101135.
5
Gaussian Discriminant Analysis for Optimal Delineation of Mild Cognitive Impairment in Alzheimer's Disease.基于高斯判别分析的阿尔茨海默病轻度认知障碍最优划分
Int J Neural Syst. 2018 Oct;28(8):1850017. doi: 10.1142/S012906571850017X. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
6
Effects of imaging modalities, brain atlases and feature selection on prediction of Alzheimer's disease.成像模态、脑图谱和特征选择对阿尔茨海默病预测的影响。
J Neurosci Methods. 2015 Dec 30;256:168-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.08.020. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
7
An ensemble learning system for a 4-way classification of Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment.用于阿尔茨海默病和轻度认知障碍 4 分类的集成学习系统。
J Neurosci Methods. 2018 May 15;302:75-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2018.03.008. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
8
Gaussian discriminative component analysis for early detection of Alzheimer's disease: A supervised dimensionality reduction algorithm.高斯判别成分分析在阿尔茨海默病早期检测中的应用:一种有监督的降维算法。
J Neurosci Methods. 2020 Oct 1;344:108856. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2020.108856. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
9
Latent diffusion model-based MRI superresolution enhances mild cognitive impairment prognostication and Alzheimer's disease classification.基于潜在扩散模型的 MRI 超分辨率可增强轻度认知障碍的预后预测和阿尔茨海默病的分类。
Neuroimage. 2024 Aug 1;296:120663. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120663. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
10
Multi-Modality Sparse Representation for Alzheimer's Disease Classification.多模态稀疏表示在阿尔茨海默病分类中的应用。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;65(3):807-817. doi: 10.3233/JAD-170338.