• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

标准化的颈动脉内膜切除术护理路径与较低的重症监护病房(ICU)入住率及显著降低的住院费用相关。

A standardized carotid endarterectomy care pathway is associated with lower ICU admission rates and a significant reduction in hospital charges.

作者信息

Grunebach Holly, Madeira Timothy, Bose Sanuja, Holscher Courtenay, Aru Roberto G, Abularrage Christopher J, Black James H, Lum Ying Wei, Perler Bruce A, Hicks Caitlin W

机构信息

The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.

The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 2025 Jan;239:116056. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116056. Epub 2024 Nov 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116056
PMID:39572277
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11702289/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the outcomes before and after initiation of a postoperative care pathway for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) patients.

METHODS

A CEA pathway was developed with stakeholders. We compared in-hospital outcomes and charges (USD) for patients undergoing CEA 18 months before (11/2019-04/2021) vs. after (05/2021-11/2022) implementation.

RESULTS

149 patients (mean age 70.2 ​± ​10.9 years, 60.4 ​% male, 75.7 ​% white) underwent CEA (83 pre-initiative, 66 post-initiative). There was significant reduction in intensive care unit (ICU) care (90.4 ​% vs.46.2 ​%; P ​< ​0.001) but no changes in stroke (3.6 ​% vs. 0 ​%), death (0 ​% vs. 0 ​%), or median length-of stay (1.0 vs. 1.0 days) following implementation (all, P ​> ​0.12). After risk adjustment, the pathway was associated with charge reductions of $1631/patient/day (95%CI -$3,008, -$254).

CONCLUSIONS

Initiation of a CEA pathway was associated with lower ICU rates and reduction in hospital charges without compromising patient outcomes.

摘要

背景

本研究调查了颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)患者术后护理路径启动前后的结果。

方法

与利益相关者共同制定了CEA路径。我们比较了实施CEA之前(2019年11月至2021年4月)和之后(2021年5月至2022年11月)患者的住院结果和费用(美元)。

结果

149例患者(平均年龄70.2±10.9岁,60.4%为男性,75.7%为白人)接受了CEA手术(83例在路径启动前,66例在路径启动后)。实施后,重症监护病房(ICU)护理显著减少(90.4%对46.2%;P<0.001),但中风(3.6%对0%)、死亡(0%对0%)或中位住院时间(1.0天对1.0天)没有变化(所有P>0.12)。经过风险调整后,该路径与每位患者每天减少1631美元的费用相关(95%CI -3008美元,-254美元)。

结论

启动CEA路径与较低的ICU使用率和医院费用降低相关,且不影响患者预后。

相似文献

1
A standardized carotid endarterectomy care pathway is associated with lower ICU admission rates and a significant reduction in hospital charges.标准化的颈动脉内膜切除术护理路径与较低的重症监护病房(ICU)入住率及显著降低的住院费用相关。
Am J Surg. 2025 Jan;239:116056. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116056. Epub 2024 Nov 10.
2
Short-stay carotid endarterectomy is safe and cost-effective.
Am J Surg. 1995 May;169(5):512-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)80207-4.
3
Improving the cost-effectiveness of carotid endarterectomy.提高颈动脉内膜切除术的成本效益。
J Vasc Surg. 1997 Sep;26(3):456-62; discussion 463-4. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(97)70038-7.
4
The changing face of carotid endarterectomy.
J Vasc Surg. 1996 Apr;23(4):622-7. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(96)80042-5.
5
A cost comparison of balloon angioplasty and stenting versus endarterectomy for the treatment of carotid artery stenosis.
J Vasc Surg. 1998 Jan;27(1):16-22; discussion 22-4. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(98)70287-3.
6
Intensive care is cost-effective in carotid endarterectomy.
Cardiovasc Surg. 2000 Jan;8(1):41-6. doi: 10.1016/s0967-2109(99)00081-2.
7
Modifiable Factors Leading to Increased Length of Stay after Carotid Endarterectomy.导致颈动脉内膜切除术后住院时间延长的可改变因素。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2017 Feb;39:195-203. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.05.126. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
8
Carotid artery stenting has increased rates of postprocedure stroke, death, and resource utilization than does carotid endarterectomy in the United States, 2005.在美国2005年,与颈动脉内膜切除术相比,颈动脉支架置入术增加了术后中风、死亡及资源利用的发生率。
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Dec;48(6):1442-50, 1450.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.07.017. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
9
Propensity score-matched analysis of 1-year outcomes of transcarotid revascularization with dynamic flow reversal, carotid endarterectomy, and transfemoral carotid artery stenting.经颈动脉血管重建术(动态血流逆转)、颈动脉内膜切除术和经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术1年结局的倾向评分匹配分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Jan;75(1):213-222.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.07.242. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
10
Weekend Effect in Carotid Endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术的周末效应。
Stroke. 2018 Dec;49(12):2945-2952. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.022305.

本文引用的文献

1
Vascular surgery patients in intensive care: a bi-national cohort study over 15 years.血管外科重症监护患者:15 年以上的两国队列研究。
ANZ J Surg. 2023 Jun;93(6):1517-1524. doi: 10.1111/ans.18080. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
2
Rethinking Routine Intensive Care After Cytoreductive Surgery With Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: The Fiscal Argument.细胞减灭术联合腹腔热化疗后重新思考常规重症监护:财政角度。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Oct;29(11):6606-6614. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-11967-6. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
3
Improving Quality of Carotid Interventions: Identifying Hospital-Level Structural Factors that can Improve Outcomes.
提高颈动脉介入治疗质量:确定能够改善治疗效果的医院层面结构因素。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Apr;72:589-600. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.09.066. Epub 2020 Nov 21.
4
Variability in hospital costs for carotid artery revascularization.颈动脉血运重建术的医院成本变异性。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Feb;69(2):563-569. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.05.228. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
5
Carotid endarterectomy: What difference does a clinical protocol make?颈动脉内膜切除术:临床方案能带来什么不同?
J Vasc Nurs. 2016 Sep;34(3):100-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvn.2016.05.003.
6
Utility of the intensive care unit in patients undergoing microvascular decompression: a multiinstitution comparative analysis.重症监护病房在微血管减压术中患者中的应用:多机构比较分析。
J Neurosurg. 2017 Jun;126(6):1967-1973. doi: 10.3171/2016.5.JNS152118. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
7
The need for treatment of hemodynamic instability following carotid endarterectomy is associated with increased perioperative and 1-year morbidity and mortality.颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后出现血流动力学不稳定的治疗需求与围手术期和 1 年的发病率和死亡率增加有关。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Jan;59(1):16-24.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.07.025. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
8
Carotid artery endarterectomy: a multidisciplinary approach to improving resource utilization and quality assurance.
J Vasc Nurs. 2013 Jun;31(2):84-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jvn.2012.08.004.
9
Comparison of short-term clinical postoperative outcomes in patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy: intensive care unit versus the ward high-dependency unit.接受颈动脉内膜切除术患者术后短期临床结局的比较:重症监护病房与病房高依赖单元。
J Vasc Nurs. 2004 Sep;22(3):85-90; quiz 91-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvn.2004.05.001.
10
Timing of postcarotid complications: a guide to safe discharge planning.颈动脉术后并发症的发生时间:安全出院计划指南
J Vasc Surg. 2001 Jul;34(1):13-6. doi: 10.1067/mva.2001.116106.