Department of Animal Behaviour, Bielefeld University, Konsequenz 45, Bielefeld, 33615, Germany.
Joint Institute for Individualisation in a Changing Environment (JICE), Bielefeld University and University of Münster, Konsequenz 45, Bielefeld, 33615, Germany.
BMC Ecol Evol. 2024 Nov 21;24(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12862-024-02329-9.
Evolutionary divergence and genetic variation are often linked to differences in microbial community structure and diversity. While environmental factors and diet heavily influence gut microbial communities, host species contributions are harder to quantify. Closely related species living in sympatry provide a unique opportunity to investigate species differences without the confounding effects of habitat and dietary variation. We therefore compared and contrasted the gut microbiota of three sympatric plover species: the widespread Kittlitz's and white-fronted plovers (Anarhynchus pecuarius and A. marginatus) and the endemic and vulnerable Madagascar plover (A. thoracicus).
We found no significant differences in the beta diversity (composition) of the gut microbiota of the three species. However, A. thoracicus exhibited higher intraspecific compositional similarity (i.e. lower pairwise distances) than the other two species; this pattern was especially pronounced among juveniles. By contrast, microbial alpha diversity varied significantly among the species, being highest in A. pecuarius, intermediate in A. marginatus and lowest in A. thoracicus. This pattern was again stronger among juveniles. Geographical distance did not significantly affect the composition of the gut microbiota, but genetic relatedness did.
While patterns of microbial diversity varied across species, the lack of compositional differences suggests that habitat and diet likely exert a strong influence on the gut microbiota of plovers. This may be enhanced by their precocial, ground-dwelling nature, which could facilitate the horizontal transmission of microbes from the environment. We hypothesise that gut microbiota diversity in plovers primarily reflects the ecological pool of microbiota, which is subsequently modified by host-specific factors including genetics. The reduced microbial and genetic diversity of the endemic A. thoracicus may hinder its ability to adapt to environmental changes, highlighting the need for increased conservation efforts for this vulnerable species.
进化分歧和遗传变异通常与微生物群落结构和多样性的差异有关。虽然环境因素和饮食对肠道微生物群落有很大影响,但宿主物种的贡献更难量化。生活在同域的密切相关的物种为研究物种差异提供了一个独特的机会,而无需考虑栖息地和饮食变化的混杂影响。因此,我们比较和对比了三种同域滨鸟物种的肠道微生物群:广泛分布的丘鹬和白额鹬(Anarhynchus pecuarius 和 A. marginatus)和特有且脆弱的马达加斯加滨鹬(A. thoracicus)。
我们没有发现这三个物种的肠道微生物群β多样性(组成)有显著差异。然而,A. thoracicus 表现出更高的种内组成相似性(即较低的成对距离),比其他两个物种更为明显;这种模式在幼鸟中尤为明显。相比之下,物种之间的微生物α多样性差异显著,A. pecuarius 最高,A. marginatus 居中,A. thoracicus 最低。这种模式在幼鸟中更为明显。地理距离对肠道微生物群的组成没有显著影响,但遗传相关性有影响。
虽然微生物多样性模式在物种间有所不同,但组成上没有差异表明,栖息地和饮食可能对滨鸟的肠道微生物群有很强的影响。这可能会因它们早熟、地面栖息的特性而增强,这可能促进微生物从环境中的水平传播。我们假设滨鸟的肠道微生物多样性主要反映了微生物的生态库,随后会受到宿主特异性因素(包括遗传因素)的影响。特有物种 A. thoracicus 的微生物和遗传多样性减少可能会阻碍其适应环境变化的能力,这突显了对这一脆弱物种增加保护努力的必要性。