• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估塞内加尔的 COVID-19 监测系统,以实现早期发现和应对:2020 年 3 月 3 日至 2022 年 5 月 31 日在凯雷马萨区的经验教训。

Evaluating Senegal's COVID-19 surveillance system for early detection and response: lessons from the Keur Massar district, March 03, 2020 to May 31, 2022.

机构信息

Ministry of Health, Dakar, Senegal.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Georgia, United States.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2024 Nov 22;24(1):3246. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20692-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-024-20692-6
PMID:39574057
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11583634/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic highlights the importance of strong surveillance systems in detecting and responding to public health threats. We sought to evaluate attributes of Keur Massar district's existing COVID-19 surveillance system.

METHOD

A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted in June 2022; desk review covered data collected from March 03, 2020 to May 31, 2022 in 18 health posts. Data were collected using a standardized questionnaire completed during a face-to-face interview and a desk review of surveillance data gathered from different notification platforms (Excel, ODK, DHIS2 aggregated, and tracker). Study was conducted in Keur Massar department, in the Dakar region. We conducted face-to-face interviews with 18 nurses in June 2022. We utilized a standardized, semi-structured questionnaire adapted from CDC guidelines for surveillance evaluation.

RESULTS

All 18 head nurses targeted, responded to the questionnaire, with an average age of 41.5 years and 63% aged between 30 and 44. The sex ratio (M/F) was 0.6, and respondents had an average of 15.1 years of experience. All nurses were involved in COVID-19 surveillance and had notified at least one suspected case. While 39% conducted COVID-19 data analysis, 55.6% received feedback from the national level. The usefulness score for the surveillance system was 77.7, with the lowest score (72.9) related to describing the pandemic's magnitude. Simplicity scored 63.3, with low scores for the availability of guidelines (0) but high scores for training and equipment (94.4). Acceptability scored 76.6, with strong support for COVID-19 surveillance but weak community involvement (48.6). While no cases were reported through the DHIS2 aggregated platform, 1327 PCR-positive SARS-CoV-2 cases were reported through the national Excel sheet and 278 PCR-positive cases were reported through the COVID-19 DHIS2 tracker during the same period. Timeliness varied, averaging 3 days using ODK and 7 days with the national Excel sheet, with a combined average of 5 days across both systems.

CONCLUSION

The study highlights challenges in COVID-19 surveillance due to limited human resources, multiple data systems, and delays in notification. While most nurses were trained and equipped, gaps in data quality, timeliness, and community support emphasize the need for streamlined processes and increased workforce capacity.

摘要

背景

COVID-19 大流行凸显了强大监测系统在发现和应对公共卫生威胁方面的重要性。我们试图评估基尔马萨区现有 COVID-19 监测系统的属性。

方法

2022 年 6 月进行了一项描述性、横断面研究;文献回顾涵盖了 2020 年 3 月 3 日至 2022 年 5 月 31 日期间从 18 个卫生站收集的数据。数据通过标准化问卷收集,由 18 名护士在 2022 年 6 月进行面对面访谈和对从不同通知平台(Excel、ODK、DHIS2 汇总和跟踪器)收集的监测数据进行文献回顾。研究在达喀尔地区的基尔马萨区进行。我们对 18 名护士长进行了面对面访谈,使用了从疾病预防控制中心监测评估指南改编的标准化半结构式问卷。

结果

所有 18 名目标护士长均对问卷做出回应,平均年龄为 41.5 岁,63%的年龄在 30 至 44 岁之间。性别比(M/F)为 0.6,受访者平均有 15.1 年的经验。所有护士均参与 COVID-19 监测,并至少报告过一例疑似病例。虽然 39%的护士进行了 COVID-19 数据分析,但只有 55.6%的护士收到了来自国家层面的反馈。监测系统的有用性评分为 77.7,描述大流行规模的得分最低(72.9)。简单性得分为 63.3,指南的可用性得分较低(0),但培训和设备得分较高(94.4)。可接受性评分为 76.6,对 COVID-19 监测的支持强烈,但社区参与度低(48.6)。虽然通过 DHIS2 汇总平台没有报告病例,但在同一时期,通过国家 Excel 表报告了 1327 例 SARS-CoV-2 阳性 PCR 病例,通过 COVID-19 DHIS2 跟踪器报告了 278 例阳性病例。及时性各不相同,使用 ODK 平均需要 3 天,使用国家 Excel 表需要 7 天,两个系统的平均时间为 5 天。

结论

该研究强调了 COVID-19 监测方面的挑战,原因是人力资源有限、多个数据系统以及通知延迟。虽然大多数护士都接受了培训并配备了设备,但数据质量、及时性和社区支持方面的差距强调了需要简化流程和增加劳动力能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f08d/11583634/5c21408d771d/12889_2024_20692_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f08d/11583634/315c158fb6c5/12889_2024_20692_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f08d/11583634/5c21408d771d/12889_2024_20692_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f08d/11583634/315c158fb6c5/12889_2024_20692_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f08d/11583634/5c21408d771d/12889_2024_20692_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating Senegal's COVID-19 surveillance system for early detection and response: lessons from the Keur Massar district, March 03, 2020 to May 31, 2022.评估塞内加尔的 COVID-19 监测系统,以实现早期发现和应对:2020 年 3 月 3 日至 2022 年 5 月 31 日在凯雷马萨区的经验教训。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Nov 22;24(1):3246. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20692-6.
2
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.在普通人群中进行 SARS-CoV-2 监测的四种不同策略的有效性和成本效益(CoV-Surv 研究):一项关于集群随机、双因素对照试验的研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 8;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04982-z.
3
Evaluation of the maternal mortality surveillance system in Mutare district, Zimbabwe, 2014-2015: a cross sectional study.2014 - 2015年津巴布韦穆塔雷区孕产妇死亡监测系统评估:一项横断面研究
Pan Afr Med J. 2017 Jul 18;27:204. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2017.27.204.7210. eCollection 2017.
4
A prospective, randomized, single-blinded, crossover trial to investigate the effect of a wearable device in addition to a daily symptom diary for the Remote Early Detection of SARS-CoV-2 infections (COVID-RED): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一项前瞻性、随机、单盲、交叉试验,旨在研究可穿戴设备对 SARS-CoV-2 感染(COVID-RED)的远程早期检测的影响:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Oct 11;22(1):694. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05643-5.
5
Evaluation of the malaria case surveillance system in KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa, 2022: a focus on DHIS2.南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省 2022 年疟疾病例监测系统评估:重点关注 DHIS2。
Malar J. 2024 Feb 14;23(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12936-024-04873-7.
6
An evaluation of enhanced surveillance of hospitalised COVID-19 patients to inform the public health response in Victoria.对维多利亚州住院 COVID-19 患者进行强化监测以提供公共卫生应对措施信息的评估。
Commun Dis Intell (2018). 2020 Nov 24;44. doi: 10.33321/cdi.2020.44.98.
7
SARS-CoV-2 case detection using community event-based surveillance system-February-September 2020: lessons learned from Senegal.利用社区事件监测系统检测 SARS-CoV-2 病例-2020 年 2 月至 9 月:塞内加尔的经验教训。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Jun;8(6). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012300.
8
A prospective, randomized, single-blinded, crossover trial to investigate the effect of a wearable device in addition to a daily symptom diary for the remote early detection of SARS-CoV-2 infections (COVID-RED): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一项前瞻性、随机、单盲、交叉试验,旨在研究可穿戴设备对远程早期检测 SARS-CoV-2 感染(COVID-RED)的影响:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jun 22;22(1):412. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05241-5.
9
Anosmia, ageusia, and other COVID-19-like symptoms in association with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test, across six national digital surveillance platforms: an observational study.在六个国家数字监测平台上,与 SARS-CoV-2 检测呈阳性相关的嗅觉丧失、味觉丧失和其他类似 COVID-19 的症状:一项观察性研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2021 Sep;3(9):e577-e586. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00115-1. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
10
Wastewater Surveillance for SARS-CoV-2 at Long-Term Care Facilities: Mixed Methods Evaluation.长期护理机构中 SARS-CoV-2 的污水监测:混合方法评估。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Aug 29;9:e44657. doi: 10.2196/44657.

本文引用的文献

1
COVID-19 surveillance in Democratic Republic of Congo, Nigeria, Senegal and Uganda: strengths, weaknesses and key Lessons.刚果民主共和国、尼日利亚、塞内加尔和乌干达的 COVID-19 监测:优势、劣势和关键经验教训。
BMC Public Health. 2023 May 8;23(1):835. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15708-6.
2
Evaluation of integrated disease surveillance and response (IDSR) and early warning and response network (EWARN) in South Sudan 2021.2021 年南苏丹综合疾病监测和应对(IDSR)及早期预警和应对网络(EWARN)评估。
Pan Afr Med J. 2022 Jun 9;42(Suppl 1):6. doi: 10.11604/pamj.supp.2022.42.1.33780. eCollection 2022.
3
Seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Senegal: a national population-based cross-sectional survey, between October and November 2020.
2020年10月至11月塞内加尔抗SARS-CoV-2抗体的血清流行率:一项基于全国人口的横断面调查
IJID Reg. 2022 Jun;3:117-125. doi: 10.1016/j.ijregi.2022.02.007. Epub 2022 Mar 5.
4
Performance of COVID-19 case-based surveillance system in FCT, Nigeria, March 2020 -January 2021.2020年3月至2021年1月尼日利亚联邦首都地区基于新型冠状病毒肺炎病例的监测系统的运行情况
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 14;17(4):e0264839. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264839. eCollection 2022.
5
Evaluation of public health surveillance systems in refugee settlements in Uganda, 2016-2019: lessons learned.2016 - 2019年乌干达难民安置点公共卫生监测系统评估:经验教训
Confl Health. 2022 Apr 8;16(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13031-022-00449-x.
6
An evaluation of COVID-19 surveillance system in New Juaben South Municipality of Ghana: a cross-sectional study.加纳新朱本南地区 COVID-19 监测系统评估:一项横断面研究。
Pan Afr Med J. 2021 Dec 6;40:206. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2021.40.206.30715. eCollection 2021.
7
COVID-19 surveillance systems in African countries.非洲国家的新冠病毒监测系统。
Health Promot Perspect. 2021 Dec 19;11(4):382-392. doi: 10.34172/hpp.2021.49. eCollection 2021.
8
COVID-19 surveillance data quality issues: a national consecutive case series.COVID-19 监测数据质量问题:一项全国连续病例系列研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 6;11(12):e047623. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047623.
9
Impact of poor disease surveillance system on COVID-19 response in africa: Time to rethink and rebuilt.疾病监测系统不完善对非洲新冠疫情应对的影响:是时候重新思考与重建了。
Clin Epidemiol Glob Health. 2021 Oct-Dec;12:100841. doi: 10.1016/j.cegh.2021.100841. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
10
The effectiveness of active surveillance measures for COVID-19 cases in Pudong New Area Shanghai, China, 2020.2020 年中国上海浦东新区针对 COVID-19 病例的主动监测措施的效果。
J Med Virol. 2021 May;93(5):2918-2924. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26805. Epub 2021 Feb 16.