Suppr超能文献

通过一项实用的、双臂、随机对照有效性试验评估送餐对居家老年人体能的影响,使他们能够继续留在社区中:Deliver-EE 试验研究方案。

Evaluating effects of meal delivery on the ability of homebound older adults to remain in the community via a pragmatic, two-arm, randomized comparative effectiveness trial: study protocol for the Deliver-EE trial.

机构信息

Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, 525 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.

Center for Gerontology & Healthcare Research, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.

出版信息

Trials. 2024 Nov 22;25(1):787. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08635-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

As food insecurity and healthcare costs are linked, healthcare entities (i.e., providers, healthcare systems, insurers) are increasingly interested in identifying and providing solutions to address food insecurity among their patients. Home-delivered meals are one long-standing solution to address food insecurity among homebound older adults. However, there is limited evidence about what mode of delivery is most effective in promoting community independence, reducing healthcare utilization, and improving quality of life as well as how these outcomes may vary as a function of people's preferences for how meals are delivered to them.

METHODS

With extensive stakeholder input, we designed and implemented a pragmatic randomized comparative effectiveness study in which we will enroll 2300 older adults on waiting lists at home-delivered meals programs across the country and randomize them to receive for 6 months, either (1) weekday lunchtime meals delivered by a local volunteer or driver who also provides socialization and wellness checks or (2) biweekly delivery of 10 frozen meals to participants' homes. Participant data will be combined with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) data to calculate post-randomization institutional vs. community days. Baseline and 3-month surveys will evaluate secondary outcomes (e.g., food insecurity, loneliness, quality of life) and exploratory outcomes (e.g., nutritional risk). To examine heterogeneity of treatment effects, we will test for interactions between the two types of meal delivery and participants' preferred mode of meal delivery as well as participants' living arrangements.

DISCUSSION

This research will be the first to prospectively evaluate the comparative effectiveness of the two predominant meal delivery options. The knowledge generated from this research will be of value to healthcare providers, health systems, payers, community-based organizations, older adults, and their families, because it will identify the mode of meal delivery that best meets homebound older adults' needs and promotes community independence. In addition, the experience of working closely with stakeholders in designing and conducting this trial will be useful to researchers seeking to engage with stakeholders in the development and evaluation of complex social service interventions while balancing regulatory, resource, and human subjects research considerations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov.  NCT05357261 . Registered on May 02, 2022.

摘要

背景

由于食品不安全和医疗保健成本之间存在关联,医疗保健实体(即提供者、医疗保健系统、保险公司)越来越有兴趣确定并提供解决方案,以解决其患者的食品不安全问题。送餐服务是解决居家老年人食品不安全问题的一种长期解决方案。然而,关于哪种交付模式最能有效促进社区独立性、减少医疗保健利用以及提高生活质量,以及这些结果如何根据人们对送餐方式的偏好而有所不同,证据有限。

方法

在广泛的利益相关者投入的基础上,我们设计并实施了一项实用的随机对照有效性研究,我们将在全国的送餐服务计划中招募 2300 名等待名单上的老年人,并将他们随机分为两组,每组接受 6 个月的治疗:(1)由当地志愿者或司机提供的工作日午餐送餐服务,志愿者或司机还提供社交和健康检查;(2)每周两次向参与者家中配送 10 份冷冻餐。将参与者数据与医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)数据相结合,以计算随机分组后的机构与社区天数。基线和 3 个月的调查将评估次要结果(例如,食品不安全、孤独感、生活质量)和探索性结果(例如,营养风险)。为了检验治疗效果的异质性,我们将检验两种送餐方式与参与者首选的送餐方式以及参与者的居住安排之间的相互作用。

讨论

这项研究将首次前瞻性评估两种主要送餐方式的相对有效性。从这项研究中获得的知识将对医疗保健提供者、医疗保健系统、支付方、社区组织、老年人及其家属具有价值,因为它将确定最能满足居家老年人需求并促进社区独立性的送餐方式。此外,在设计和开展这项试验中与利益相关者密切合作的经验,对于那些希望在平衡监管、资源和人体研究考虑的情况下,与利益相关者一起参与复杂社会服务干预措施的开发和评估的研究人员来说将是有用的。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov。NCT05357261。注册于 2022 年 5 月 2 日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6621/11583665/f3758b7773cb/13063_2024_8635_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验